Article

Trial of a CAD/CAM system for fabricating complete dentures.

Complete Denture Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan.
Dental Materials Journal (Impact Factor: 0.81). 01/2011; 30(1):93-6.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fabrication of a complete denture using a CAD/CAM system. Cone beam CT was used to measure the complete denture and the artificial teeth. After a 3D complete denture image was structured using 3D CAD software, we factored out the artificial teeth and obtained a 3D denture base image. A machining center cut an acrylic resin block, and fabricated an acrylic complete denture base. The artificial teeth were bonded to the cut denture base using resin cement. A 3D digitizer digitized the fabricated acrylic denture. We measured the deviations between the master 3D complete denture image and the 3D data of the fabricated acrylic denture. The average deviations from the master 3D image were 0.50 mm for the occlusal surface. This present study indicates that it is possible to fabricate a complete denture using a CAD/CAM system.

1 Bookmark
 · 
446 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In prosthodontics, conventional methods of fabrication of oral and facial prostheses have been considered the gold standard for many years. The development of computer-aided manufacturing and the medical application of this industrial technology have provided an alternative way of fabricating oral and facial prostheses. This narrative review aims to evaluate the different streams of computer-aided manufacturing in prosthodontics. To date, there are two streams: the subtractive and the additive approaches. The differences reside in the processing protocols, materials used, and their respective accuracy. In general, there is a tendency for the subtractive method to provide more homogeneous objects with acceptable accuracy that may be more suitable for the production of intraoral prostheses where high occlusal forces are anticipated. Additive manufacturing methods have the ability to produce large workpieces with significant surface variation and competitive accuracy. Such advantages make them ideal for the fabrication of facial prostheses.
    International Journal of Dentistry 01/2014; 2014:783948.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Conventional complete denture prosthetics require several appointments to register the maxillomandibular relationship and evaluate the esthetics. The fabrication of milled complete dental prostheses with digital scanning technology may decrease the number of appointments. The step-by-step method necessary to obtain impressions, maxillomandibular relation records, and anterior tooth position with an anatomic measuring device is described. The technique allows the generation of a virtual denture, which is milled to exact specifications without the use of conventional stone casts, flasking, or processing techniques.
    The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 01/2014; · 1.22 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background. Despite the accuracy of intraoral scanners (IOSs) in producing single-unit scans and the possibility of generating complete dentures digitally, little is known about their feasibility and accuracy in digitizing edentulous jaws. The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaw models with IOSs. Methods. The authors used an industrial laser scanner (reference scanner) and four IOSs to digitize two representative edentulous jaw models. They loaded the data sets obtained into three-dimensional evaluation software, superimposed the data sets and compared them for accuracy. The authors used a one-way analysis of variance to compute differences within groups (precision), as well as to compare values with those of the reference scanner (trueness) (statistical significance, P < .05). Results. Mean trueness values ranged from 44.1 to 591.8 micrometers. Data analysis yielded statistically significant differences in trueness between all scanners (P < .05). Mean precision values ranged from 21.6 to 698.0 μm. The study results showed statistically significant differences in precision between all scanners (P < .05), except for the CEREC AC Bluecam (Sirona, Bensheim, Germany) and the Zfx IntraScan (manufactured by MHT Italy, Negrar, Italy/ MHT Optic Research, Niederhasli, Switzerland; distributed by Zfx, Dachau, Germany) (P > .05). Conclusions. Digitizing edentulous jaw models with the use of IOSs appears to be feasible, although the accuracy of the scanners differs significantly. The results of this study showed that only one scanner was sufficiently accurate to warrant further intraoral investigations. Further enhancements are necessary to recommend these IOSs for this particular indication. Practical Implications. On the basis of the results of this study, the authors cannot recommend these four IOSs for digitization of edentulous jaws in vivo. Key Words. Intraoral scanner; digital impression; edentulous jaws; accuracy; precision; trueness.
    Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) 08/2013; 144(8):914-920. · 1.82 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
37 Downloads
Available from
Jun 1, 2014