Colorectal cancer screening with odour material by canine scent detection

Department of Surgery and Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Gut (Impact Factor: 14.66). 05/2011; 60(6):814-9. DOI: 10.1136/gut.2010.218305
Source: PubMed


Early detection and early treatment are of vital importance to the successful treatment of various cancers. The development of a novel screening method that is as economical and non-invasive as the faecal occult blood test (FOBT) for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) is needed. A study was undertaken using canine scent detection to determine whether odour material can become an effective tool in CRC screening.
Exhaled breath and watery stool samples were obtained from patients with CRC and from healthy controls prior to colonoscopy. Each test group consisted of one sample from a patient with CRC and four control samples from volunteers without cancer. These five samples were randomly and separately placed into five boxes. A Labrador retriever specially trained in scent detection of cancer and a handler cooperated in the tests. The dog first smelled a standard breath sample from a patient with CRC, then smelled each sample station and sat down in front of the station in which a cancer scent was detected.
33 and 37 groups of breath and watery stool samples, respectively, were tested. Among patients with CRC and controls, the sensitivity of canine scent detection of breath samples compared with conventional diagnosis by colonoscopy was 0.91 and the specificity was 0.99. The sensitivity of canine scent detection of stool samples was 0.97 and the specificity was 0.99. The accuracy of canine scent detection was high even for early cancer. Canine scent detection was not confounded by current smoking, benign colorectal disease or inflammatory disease.
This study shows that a specific cancer scent does indeed exist and that cancer-specific chemical compounds may be circulating throughout the body. These odour materials may become effective tools in CRC screening. In the future, studies designed to identify cancer-specific volatile organic compounds will be important for the development of new methods for early detection of CRC.

Download full-text


Available from: Tetsuro Yamazato,
  • Source
    • "Colorectal cancer Sonoda et al. (2011) "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Numerous studies have attempted to demonstrate the olfactory ability of canines to detect several common cancer types from human bodily fluids, breath and tissue. Canines have been reported to detect bladder cancer (sensitivity of 0.63-0.73 and specificity of 0.64-0.92) and prostate cancer (sensitivity of 0.91-0.99 and specificity of 0.91-0.97) from urine; breast cancer (sensitivity of 0.88 and specificity of 0.98) and lung cancer (sensitivity 0.56-0.99 and specificity of 8.30-0.99) on breath and colorectal cancer from stools (sensitivity of 0.91-0.97 and specificity of 0.97-0.99). The quoted figures of sensitivity and specificity across differing studies demonstrate that in many cases results are variable from study to study; this raises questions about the reproducibility of methodology and study design which we have identified herein. Furthermore in some studies the controls used have resulted in differentiation of samples which are of limited use for clinical diagnosis. These studies provide some evidence that cancer gives rise to different volatile organic compounds (VOCs) compared to healthy samples. Whilst canine detection may be unsuitable for clinical implementation they can, at least, provide inspiration for more traditional laboratory investigations.
    • "Therefore, there is a clear demand for a more economical, noninvasive and efficient detection method. Sonoda et al. (2011) used one Labrador retriever that had previously been trained for water rescue, and was retrained as a cancer detection dog using a reward based approach (7). Using both breath and watery stool samples of colorectal cancer patients and healthy controls, they found 91% sensitivity and 99% specificity for breath samples, and 97% sensitivity and 99% specificity for watery stool samples. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Olfactory cancer detection shows promise as an affordable, precise, and noninvasive way to screen for cancer. This review focuses on two methods of olfactory cancer detection: first, the ability of canines to differentiate between cancerous and healthy individuals through the use of biological samples and second, electronic nose technology that uses chemical sensors to detect known biomarkers in exhaled breath. This review summarizes and critiques past research and outlines future directions to improve understanding of both canine olfaction and electronic nose technology.
    Cancer Investigation 06/2015; 33(9). DOI:10.3109/07357907.2015.1047510 · 2.22 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "2 Giant Schnauzer Double blind Blood and tissue In the study the authors calculated a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 95% for tissue sample tests, and a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 98% for blood sample tests Greater number of samples Inclusion of other inflammatory processes besides cancer and other confounders (i.e., smoking) in the control group [20] Colorectal cancer 1 Labrador Retriever Double blind Breath and watery stool samples The authors calculated a sensitivity for canine scent detection of 91% and 97% for breath tests and watery stool tests, respectively; a specificity of 99% for, both, breathe tests and watery stool tests Greater number of samples Inclusion of more inflammatory processes and a greater number of confounders in the control group Inclusion of a greater number of dogs in the study [21] Prostate cancer 1 Belgian Malinois Shepherd Double blind Urine The calculated sensitivity and specificity was 91% Greater number of samples Inclusion of a greater number of dogs in the study [22] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In order to find better tools in the diagnosis of cancer in an earlier and more precise manner, researchers have explored the use of volatile organic compound (VOCs) as a way to detect this disease. Interestingly, the canine olfactory apparatus was observed to detect cancer in two anecdotal reports. After the description of these events, researchers began to study this phenomenon in a structured way in order to assess the ability of canines in detecting cancer-related VOCs. Due to the fact that some of these studies have shown that the canine olfactory apparatus is highly proficient in the detection of cancer-related VOCs, in this article we assess the possibility of constructing a bioelectronic-nose, based on canine olfactory receptors (ORs), for the purpose of diagnosing cancer in a more sensitive, specific, and cost effective manner than what is available nowadays. Furthermore, in order to prove the feasibility and the need of the proposed apparatus, we searched for the following type of articles: all of the studies that have examined, to our knowledge, the ability of dogs in detecting cancer; articles that assess the dog olfactory receptor (OR) gene repertoire, since a central part of the proposed bioelectronic nose is being able to recognize the odorant that emanates from the cancerous lesion, and for that purpose is necessary to express the canine ORs in heterologous cells; examples of articles that depict different devices that have been built for the purpose of detecting cancer-related VOCs, so as to assess if the construction of the proposed apparatus is needed; and articles that describe examples of already constructed bioelectronic noses, in order to demonstrate the existence of a technical precedent and thus the plausibility of the proposed device. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Medical Hypotheses 04/2015; 85(2). DOI:10.1016/j.mehy.2015.04.024 · 1.07 Impact Factor
Show more