Article

An evaluation of access to health care services along the rural-urban continuum in Canada.

Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto ON M4N3M5, Canada.
BMC Health Services Research (Impact Factor: 1.66). 01/2011; 11:20. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-20
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Studies comparing the access to health care of rural and urban populations have been contradictory and inconclusive. These studies are complicated by the influence of other factor which have been shown to be related to access and utilization. This study assesses the equity of access to health care services across the rural-urban continuum in Canada before and after taking other determinants of access into account.
This is a cross-sectional study of the population of the 10 provinces of Canada using data from the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS 2.1). Five different measures of access and utilization are compared across the continuum of rural-urban. Known determinants of utilization are taken into account according to Andersen's Health Behaviour Model (HBM); location of residence at the levels of province, health region, and community is also controlled for.
This study found that residents of small cities not adjacent to major centres, had the highest reported utilisation rates of influenza vaccines and family physician services, were most likely to have a regular medical doctor, and were most likely to report unmet need. Among the rural categories there was a gradient with the most rural being least likely to have had a flu shot, use specialist physicians services, or have a regular medical doctor. Residents of the most urban centres were more likely to report using specialist physician services. Many of these differences are diminished or eliminated once other factors are accounted for. After adjusting for other factors those living in the most urban areas were more likely to have seen a specialist physician. Those in rural communities had a lower odds of receiving a flu shot and having a regular medical doctor. People residing in the most urban and most rural communities were less likely to have a regular medical doctor. Those in any of the rural categories were less likely to report unmet need.
Inequities in access to care along the rural-urban continuum exist and can be masked when evaluation is done at a very large scale with gross indicators of rural-urban. Understanding the relationship between rural-urban and other determinants will help policy makers to target interventions appropriately: to specific demographic, provincial, community, or rural categories.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
377 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method continues to be a popular measure of spatial accessibility, especially in relation to primary-level health care. Despite its popularity, most applications of the 2SFCA method are limited by the utilisation of only a single catchment size within a small geographic area. This limitation is significant to health policies which are mostly applied at the state or national scale. In this paper, a five-level dynamic catchment size was trialled within the 2SFCA method to all of Australia, with a population's remoteness used to delineate increasing catchment sizes. Initial trial results highlighted two perverse outcomes which were caused by sudden changes in catchment sizes between each level. Further refinement led to trialling an additional three-level catchment sub-type to the 2SFCA method, which created a smoother transition between remoteness levels. This study has demonstrated an effective approach to dynamically apply variable and more appropriate catchment sizes into different types of rural areas, which for the first time enables the 2SFCA method to be suitable for national-level access modelling and its potential application to health policy.
    Applied Geography 10/2014; 54:182–188. · 3.08 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Studies suggest that individuals of low education and/or income, new Canadians (immigrated <10 years ago), and individuals of Aboriginal identity may have fewer food allergies than the general population. However, given the difficulty in recruiting such populations (hereafter referred to as vulnerable populations), by using conventional survey methodologies, the prevalence of food allergy among these populations in Canada has not been estimated. Objectives To estimate the prevalence of food allergy among vulnerable populations in Canada, to compare with the nonvulnerable populations and to identify demographic characteristics predictive of food allergy. Methods By using 2006 Canadian Census data, postal codes with high proportions of vulnerable populations were identified and households were randomly selected to participate in a telephone survey. Information on food allergies and demographics was collected. Prevalence estimates were weighted by using Census data to account for the targeted sampling. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of food allergy. Results Of 12,762 eligible households contacted, 5734 households completed the questionnaire (45% response rate). Food allergy was less common among adults without postsecondary education versus those with postsecondary education (6.4% [95% CI, 5.5%-7.3%] vs 8.9% [95% CI, 7.7%-10%]) and new Canadians versus those born in Canada (3.2% [95% CI, 2.2%-4.3%] vs 8.2% [95% CI, 7.4%-9.1%]). There was no difference in prevalence between those of low and of high income or those with and without Aboriginal identity. Conclusion Analysis of our data suggests that individuals of low education and new Canadians self-report fewer allergies, which may be due to genetics, environment, lack of appropriate health care, or lack of awareness of allergies, which reduces self-report.
    The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. 08/2014;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: lack of access to health services has been mentioned as one of the main causes of health inequity in the health system. The aim of this study was to measure horizontal inequity in access to outpatient services in Shiraz. Methods: This household survey was conducted among 1608 participants above 18 years in Shiraz in 2012. Four-stage sampling was used. According to the high amount of zero-valued of outpatient services utilization, zero inflated regression model was established. We computed concentration index (CI) for determining actual (CI M) and indirect standardized utilization (CI IS) of outpatient services in order to compute a horizontal inequity index (HII). The results were analyzed using Stata software, version 8. Results: The CI M was not statistically significant (-0.016, 95% CI: -0.097, 0.066). But the CI IS was statistically significant and favored the rich (0.06, 95% CI: 0.010 to 0.001). The horizontal inequity index was -0.076. Conclusions: There was no inequality in actual amount of outpatient utilization, maybe High subsidization to health care by government in public sector, high insurance coverage, low prices of health services in the public sector, quality of services and opportunity cost of high income groups were the reasons for our results.
    Journal of Research in Health Sciences 01/2015;

Preview

Download
1 Download
Available from