Article

Variation in the gross tumor volume and clinical target volume for preoperative radiotherapy of primary large high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity among RTOG sarcoma radiation oncologists.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53045, USA.
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics (Impact Factor: 4.59). 12/2011; 81(5):e775-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.033
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate variability in the definition of preoperative radiotherapy gross tumor volume (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV) delineated by sarcoma radiation oncologists.
Extremity sarcoma planning CT images along with the corresponding diagnostic MRI from two patients were distributed to 10 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group sarcoma radiation oncologists with instructions to define GTV and CTV using standardized guidelines. The CT data with contours were then returned for central analysis. Contours representing statistically corrected 95% (V95) and 100% (V100) agreement were computed for each structure.
For the GTV, the minimum, maximum, mean (SD) volumes (mL) were 674, 798, 752±35 for the lower extremity case and 383, 543, 447±46 for the upper extremity case. The volume (cc) of the union, V95 and V100 were 882, 761, and 752 for the lower, and 587, 461, and 455 for the upper extremity, respectively. The overall GTV agreement was judged to be almost perfect in both lower and upper extremity cases (kappa=0.9 [p<0.0001] and kappa=0.86 [p<0.0001]). For the CTV, the minimum, maximum, mean (SD) volumes (mL) were 1145, 1911, 1605±211 for the lower extremity case and 637, 1246, 1006±180 for the upper extremity case. The volume (cc) of the union, V95, and V100 were 2094, 1609, and 1593 for the lower, and 1533, 1020, and 965 for the upper extremity cases, respectively. The overall CTV agreement was judged to be almost perfect in the lower extremity case (kappa=0.85 [p<0.0001]) but only substantial in the upper extremity case (kappa=0.77 [p<0.0001]).
Almost perfect agreement existed in the GTV of these two representative cases. There was no significant disagreement in the CTV of the lower extremity, but variation in the CTV of upper extremity was seen, perhaps related to the positional differences between the planning CT and the diagnostic MRI.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
101 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: Peritumoral edema may harbor sarcoma cells. The extent of suspicious edema (SE) included in the treatment volume is subject to clinical judgment, balancing the risk of missing tumor cells with excess toxicity. Our goal was to determine variability in SE delineation by sarcoma radiation oncologists (RO). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twelve expert ROs were provided with T1 gadolinium and T2-weighted MR images of 10 patients with high-grade extremity soft-tissue sarcoma. Gross tumor volume, clinical target volume (CTV)3cm (3 cm longitudinal and 1.5 cm radial margin), and CTV2cm (2 cm longitudinal and 1 cm radial margin) were contoured by a single observer. Suspicious peritumoral edema, defined as abnormal signal on T2 images, was independently delineated by all 12 ROs. Contouring agreement was analyzed using the simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) algorithm and kappa statistics. RESULTS: The mean volumes of GTV, CTV2cm, and CTV3cm were, respectively, 130 cm3 (7-413 cm3), 280 cm3 and 360 cm3. The mean consensus volume computed using the STAPLE algorithm at 95% confidence interval was 188 cm3 (24-565 cm3) with a substantial overall agreement corrected for chance (mean kappa = 0.71; range: 0.32-0.87). The minimum, maximum, and mean volume of SE (excluding the GTV) were 4, 182, and 58 cm3 (representing a median of 29% of the GTV volume). The median volume of SE not included in the CTV2cm and in the CTV3cm was 5 and 0.3 cm3, respectively. There were 3 large tumors with >30 cm3 of SE not included in the CTV3cm volume. CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that SE would empirically seem to be a more subjective volume, a substantial or near-perfect interobserver agreement was observed in SE delineation in most cases with high-grade soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremity. A median of 97% of the consensus SE is within the CTV2cm (99.8% within the CTV3cm). In a minority of cases, however, significant expansion of the CTVs is required to cover SE.
    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 03/2013; · 4.59 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aims To evaluate tumour volume changes after preoperative radiotherapy (PRT) for borderline operable soft tissue sarcomas (STS) Materials and Methods A retrospective review was performed of 68 patients who received PRT between December 2004 and July 2011. Endpoints were radiological response, surgical margins, local control and survival. Results Median tumour size was 12.5 cm. Tumour location was extremity (87%), trunk (12%), and neck (1%). Commonest histological subtypes were myxoid liposarcoma (32%) and myxofibrosarcoma (16%). The majority of patients (88%) received 50Gy in 25 fractions. Post-radiotherapy imaging was available in 55 cases. By RECIST there was stable disease in 89%, partial response in 7% and progressive disease in 4%. Tumour volumes reduced in 80%. Median change in maximal tumour dimension was -13.6%; median change in volume was greater, at -33.3%. Tumour volumes increased in 11 cases (20%). However, surgical margins were clear in all 11 cases, with no local recurrences in this group. For the entire group, surgical margins were clear in 93%, and microscopically positive in 7%. Eight patients (12%) had local relapse at 2 - 24.8 months after surgery. Two year local relapse free survival was 87.5%; 2 year overall survival was 74.7%. Conclusion The majority of tumours showed reduction in volume. A small number of tumours increased in volume, but there was no definite relationship between volume increase and poor surgical outcomes or lower local control rates. Local control was equivalent to published series’ of PRT. PRT is a reasonable approach in patients with borderline resectable tumours.
    European journal of surgical oncology: the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology 04/2014; · 2.56 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Radiation therapy (RT) is an integral component of the treatment of many sarcomas and relies on accurate targeting of tumor tissue. Despite conventional treatment planning and RT, local failure rates of 10% to 28% at 5 years have been reported for locally advanced, unresectable sarcomas, due in part to limitations in the cumulative RT dose that may be safely delivered. We describe studies of the potential usefulness of gold nanoparticles modified for durable systemic circulation (through polyethylene glycosylation; hereinafter "P-GNPs") as adjuvants for RT of sarcomas. In studies of two human sarcoma-derived cell lines, P-GNP in conjunction with RT caused increased unrepaired DNA damage, reflected by approximately 1.61-fold increase in γ-H2AX (histone phosphorylated on Ser(139)) foci density compared with RT alone. The combined RT and P-GNP also led to significantly reduced clonogenic survival of tumor cells, compared to RT alone, with dose-enhancement ratios of 1.08 to 1.16. In mice engrafted with human sarcoma tumor cells, the P-GNP selectively accumulated in the tumor and enabled durable imaging, potentially aiding radiosensitization as well as treatment planning. Mice pretreated with P-GNP before targeted RT of their tumors exhibited significantly improved tumor regression and overall survival, with long-term survival in one third of mice in this treatment group compared to none with RT only. Interestingly, prior RT of sarcoma tumors increased subsequent extravasation and in-tumor deposition of P-GNP. These results together suggest P-GNP may be integrated into the RT of sarcomas, potentially improving target imaging and radiosensitization of tumor while minimizing dose to normal tissues.
    Translational oncology 12/2013; 6(6):722-31. · 3.40 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
85 Downloads
Available from
Jun 5, 2014