Molecular imaging of c-Met tyrosine kinase activity

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Analytical Biochemistry (Impact Factor: 2.31). 05/2011; 412(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2011.01.028
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The receptor tyrosine kinase c-Met and its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF), modulate signaling cascades implicated in cellular proliferation, survival, migration, invasion, and angiogenesis. Therefore, dysregulation of HGF/c-Met signaling can compromise the cellular capacity to moderate these activities and can lead to tumorigenesis, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance in various human malignancies. To facilitate studies investigating HGF/c-Met receptor coupling or c-Met signaling events in real time and in living cells and animals, here we describe a genetically engineered reporter where bioluminescence can be used as a surrogate for c-Met tyrosine kinase activity. c-Met kinase activity in cultured cells and tumor xenografts was monitored quantitatively and dynamically in response to the activation or inhibition of the HGF/c-Met signaling pathway. Treatment of tumor-bearing animals with a c-Met inhibitor and the HGF neutralizing antibody stimulated the reporter's bioluminescence activity in a dose-dependent manner and led to a regression of U-87 MG tumor xenografts. Results obtained from these studies provide unique insights into the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of agents that modulate c-Met activity and validate c-Met as a target for human glioblastoma therapy.

Download full-text


Available from: Shama Virani, Jun 22, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cancer drug development generally performs in vivo evaluation of treatment effects that have traditionally relied on detection of morphologic changes. The emergence of new targeted therapies, which may not result in gross morphologic changes, has spurred investigation into more specific imaging methods to quantify response, such as targeted fluorescent probes and bioluminescent cells. The present study investigated tissue response to docetaxel or zoledronic acid (ZA) in a mouse model of bony metastasis. Intratibial implantations of breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231) were monitored throughout this study using several modalities: molecular resonance imaging (MRI) tumor volume and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), micro-computed tomography (µCT) bone volume, bioluminescence imaging (BLI) reporting cancer cell apoptosis, and fluorescence using Osteosense 800 and CatK 680-FAST. Docetaxel treatment resulted in tumor cell kill reflected by ADC and BLI increases and tumor volume reduction, with delayed bone recovery seen in µCT prefaced by increased osteoblastic activity (Osteosense 800). In contrast, the ZA treatment group produced similar values in MRI, BLI, and Osteosense 800 fluorescence imaging readouts when compared to controls. However, µCT bone volume increased significantly by the first week post-treatment and the CatK 680-FAST signal was slightly diminished by 4 weeks following ZA treatment. Multimodality imaging provides a more comprehensive tool for new drug evaluation and efficacy screening through identification of morphology as well as function and apoptotic signaling.
    Translational oncology 12/2012; 5(6):415-21. DOI:10.1593/tlo.12298 · 3.40 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: One of the recent breakthroughs in cancer research is the identification of activating mutations in various receptor tyrosine kinase(RTK) pathways in many cancers including colorectal cancer(CRC). We hypothesize that, alternative to mutations, overexpression of various oncogenic RTKs may also underpin CRC pathogenesis, and different RTK may couple with distinct downstream signaling pathways in different subtypes of human CRC. By immunohistochemistry, we show here that RTK members ErbB2, ErbB3 and c-Met were in deed differentially overexpressed in colorectal cancer patient samples leading to constitutive activation of RTK signaling pathways. Using ErbB2 specific inhibitor Lapatinib and c-Met specific inhibitor PHA-665752, we further demonstrated that this constitutive activation of RTK signaling is necessary for the survival of colorectal cancer cells. Furthermore, we show that RTK overexpression pattern dictates the use of downstream AKT and/or MAPK pathways. Our data are important additions to current oncogenic mutation models, and further explain the clinical variation in therapeutic responses of colorectal cancer. Our findings advocate for more personalized therapy tailored to individual patients based on their type of RTK expression in addition to their mutation status.
    PLoS ONE 10/2013; 8(10):e78086. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0078086 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The E2 envelope glycoprotein is the major immunodominant protein of classical swine fever virus (CSFV), and can induce neutralizing antibodies and protective immune responses in infected swine. We developed a tandem-repeat multiple-epitope recombinant protein that contains two copies of each of the regions of E2 spanned by residues 693-704, 770-780, and 826-843, coupled by two copies of the region spanned by residues 1446-1460 of the CSFV nonstructural protein NS2-3. The chemically synthesized gene was expressed in Escherichia coli as a fusion with glutathione S-8 (GST), named GST-BT21. After it was purified with Glutathione Sepharose 4B, we used Western blotting to characterize the construct and surface plasmon resonance to analyze its affinity and specific interaction with CSFV-positive serum. Purified GST-BT21 protein displayed excellent immunoreactivity with antiserum against CSFV (Tian et al., 2012), and surface plasmon resonance confirmed the specific affinity between BT21, but not GST, and antibodies in serum from animals infected with CSFV. Surface plasmon resonance is a sensitive and precise method for epitope evaluation, and it can be used to characterize the immunogenicity and functions of recombinant proteins.
    Journal of Biotechnology 05/2012; 161(3):221-7. DOI:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.05.004 · 2.88 Impact Factor