Article

Influenza Vaccination in Young Children Reduces Influenza-Associated Hospitalizations in Older Adults, 2002-2006

Initiative for the Forecasting and Modeling of Infectious Disease, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (Impact Factor: 4.22). 02/2011; 59(2):327-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03271.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To assess how influenza vaccination coverage in children is related to pneumonia and influenza (P&I) in older adults and whether sociodemographic factors modify these associations.
Approximately 5 million hospitalization records from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for four influenza years (2002-2006) were abstracted. A single-year age distribution of rates of P&I hospitalization was estimated according to state for each influenza season; an exponential acceleration in the P&I rates with age was observed for each influenza season. State- and season-specific P&I rate accelerations were regressed against the percentage of vaccinated children, older adults, or both using mixed effects models.
U.S. population, 2002 to 2006.
U.S. population aged 65 and older.
State-level influenza annual vaccination coverage data in children and older adults were obtained from the National Immunization Survey and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, respectively.
Child influenza vaccination coverage was negatively associated with age acceleration in P&I, whereas influenza vaccination in the older adults themselves was not significantly associated with P&I in older adults.
Vaccination of children against influenza may induce herd immunity against influenza for older adults and has the potential to be more beneficial to older adults than the existing policy of preventing influenza by vaccinating older adults themselves.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Elena N Naumova, Jul 30, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
106 Views
  • Source
    • "Mathematical modelling in addition to a small number of clinical and epidemiological studies reveal that the best societal use of influenza [110] [111] or pneumococcal vaccines could be to target pre-school or school children as the main transmitters groups [82 ,83], in addition to or instead of elderly people or other high-risk groups in whom vaccine efficacy is often poor [112] [54] [25]. This has been demonstrated as being effective for community-dwelling elderly populations [110] [111] [113] [83] [82] and in those living in institutional settings [114] [115]. Shifting of vaccine targets from the most vulnerable groups to the high transmitter or to the best responder group to vaccination would represent a substantial societal challenge in view of the tension between individual rights and public health [116]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Vaccines are powerful public health tools that have been of tremendous benefit in protecting vulnerable populations worldwide from many pathogens. However, vaccine- preventable diseases still remain a considerable burden and this is particularly true among aging and aged populations in industrialized countries. The predicted demographic shift in the population landscape towards an ever-increasing aging population and the evidence suggesting that older individuals mount less-than optimal immune response to vaccination have raised the question of improving vaccine responses in older individuals. This review presents recent progress in the understanding at the cellular and molecular levels of age related immune decline and strategies to translate current knowledge into the development of immunization strategies to promote healthy aging, keeping older members of society autonomous and independent.
    Current topics in medicinal chemistry 09/2013; DOI:10.2174/15680266113136660181 · 3.45 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Vaccines against microbial diseases have improved the health of millions of people. In the next decade and beyond, many conceptual and technological scientific advances offer extraordinary opportunities to expand the portfolio of immunisations against viral and bacterial diseases and to pioneer the first vaccines against human parasitic and fungal diseases. Scientists in the public and private sectors are motivated as never before to bring about these innovations in immunisation. Many societal factors threaten to compromise realisation of the public health gains that immunisation can achieve in the next decade and beyond--understanding these factors is imperative. Vaccines are typically given to healthy individuals and safety issues loom high on the list of public concerns. The public needs to regain confidence in immunisation and trust the organisations responsible for the research, development, and implementation of vaccines. In the past, by use of a judicious amalgam of knowledge and empiricism, successful vaccines were largely developed by microbiologists who identified antigens that induced immune responses to conserved pathogen components. In the future, vaccines need to be developed against deadly diseases for which this strategy is often not feasible because of the extensive antigenic variability of relevant pathogens. High microbial diversity means that immunity after natural infection is often ineffective for prevention of disease on subsequent exposure, for example in HIV infection and malaria. Additionally, vaccines need to be generated to protect the people who are most vulnerable because of age or underlying diseases. Thus, in the future, a much deeper understanding of the immunological challenges--including the diversifying role of host genetics and environmental factors, leading perhaps to more personalised approaches-will be the touchstone for rational design and development of adjuvants that result in novel safe and effective vaccines.
    The Lancet 06/2011; 378(9788):348-59. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60407-8 · 45.22 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Based on an increasingly extensive literature expressing the large interest in the field, this paper gives an overview of different aspects of influenza prevention in children. It relies on paradoxes. First, the heaviest part of the burden is well demonstrated in the youngest infants by numerous epidemiological data elsewhere. On the contrary, with older children, the prevention by influenza vaccines is more efficacious-without notable side effects. Second, the available TIV vaccines are 60 years old and the requests of registration and regulation of vaccines have evolved. There is a specific need in children: it is time to re-discuss the pragmatic utilization of influenza vaccines (full dose in the youngest patient? More flexibility regarding the interval between the two required doses in vaccine-naïve children), and to change from a compassionate use to a targeted research and adapted vaccines considering the limits of TIV in the youngest children. Third, influenza virus transmission is the highest in children in semi-close communities (day-care centers, schools), diffusing to households and more largely to the population. A restricted policy on high risk groups (roughly 10% in a pediatric population, all medical conditions including asthma, for whom influenza vaccine coverage is a 15-75% range) is far below the estimated threshold of 45% coverage rate to limit the virus circulation by an indirect impact during seasonal epidemics. Fourth, public health decisions in the vaccination field are usually taken from top to bottom. The pandemic A/H1N1 has toughly demonstrated that "forgetting" about the perception and expectations of the public and the parents nearly created conflicts and at least a strong resistance impeding the quality of a program worked on for a long time ahead. Fifth, and not the least, HCPs are pivotal in influenza vaccination mostly trusted by the parents. Too often, they are not backed by a national and clear support and they need to reinforce their knowledge on the disease and the vaccines.
    Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics 01/2012; 8(1):107-18. DOI:10.4161/hv.8.1.18278 · 3.64 Impact Factor
Show more