Implementation of simulation in surgical practice: Minimally invasive surgery has taken the lead: The Dutch experience

ivision of Women and Baby, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, PO Box 85500, Room F05-126, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Medical Teacher (Impact Factor: 1.68). 02/2011; 33(2):105-15. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.550967
Source: PubMed


Minimal invasive techniques are rapidly becoming standard surgical techniques for many surgical procedures. To develop the skills necessary to apply these techniques, box trainers and/or inanimate models may be used, but these trainers lack the possibility of inherent objective classification of results. In the past decade, virtual reality (VR) trainers were introduced for training minimal invasive techniques. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is, by nature, very suitable for this type of training. The specific psychomotor skills and eye-hand coordination needed for MIS can be mastered largely using VR simulation techniques. It is also possible to transfer skills learned on a simulator to real operations, resulting in error reduction and shortening of procedural operating time. The authors aim to enlighten the process of gaining acceptance in the Netherlands for novel training techniques. The Dutch Societies of Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Urology each developed individual training curricula for MIS using simulation techniques, to be implemented in daily practice. The ultimate goal is to improve patient safety. The authors outline the opinions of actors involved, such as different simulators, surgical trainees, surgeons, surgical societies, hospital boards, government, and the public. The actual implementation of nationwide training curricula for MIS is, however, a challenging step.

14 Reads
  • Source
    • "Animal, cadaver and patient models provide a more realistic setting, but are also more expensive and have their connected ethical issues. Extensive surveys of different validated simulators and models that are available are provided by Aggarwal, Moorthy and Darzi (2004), Reznick and MacRae (2006), Bashankaev, Baido and Wexner (2011), Schreuder, Oei, Maas, Borleffs, and Schijven (2011) and Gallagher and O'Sullivan (2012). Several prospective studies have investigated the effect of trainee characteristics on LS simulator performance and the learning curve. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This literature review covers the choices to consider in training complex procedural, perceptual and motor skills. In particular, we focus on laparoscopic surgery. An overview is provided of important training factors modulating the acquisition, durability, transfer, and efficiency of trained skills. We summarize empirical studies and their theoretical background on the topic of training complex cognitive and motor skills that are pertinent to proficiency in laparoscopic surgery. The overview pertains to surgical simulation training for laparoscopy, but also to training in other demanding procedural and dexterous tasks, such as aviation, managing complex systems and sports. Evidence-based recommendations are provided for facilitating efficiency in laparoscopic motor skill training such as session spacing, adaptive training, task variability, part-task training, mental imagery and deliberate practice.
    Psychological Research 11/2013; 78(6). DOI:10.1007/s00426-013-0525-5 · 2.47 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Models for training urological procedures without burdening patients are available at varying costs. We examined the value of training on a low-fidelity model in addition to training on a high-fidelity simulator in a cystoscopy training program. Thirty-two medical students were randomized to an intervention and a control group. The former started by performing cystoscopy on a low-cost, low-fidelity, glass globe model before moving on to training on the URO Mentor (UM), a computerized simulator. The control group took part in the same UM training program but not in the low-fidelity training. Performance on UM was assessed by a global rating score, percentage of correctly inspected areas of the bladder (% inspected areas), time, and number of traumas caused. The intervention group had generally higher scores. Its global rating score on task 1 was significantly higher than that of the control group (Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.046, effect size 0.6) and the group also scored higher, albeit not significantly, on time and % inspected areas. All students said they valued training with UM, but the appreciation of the intervention group was stronger (mean 8.9 vs. 8.1 on a scale from 1 to 10, P = 0.017, effect size 1.8). A low-fidelity glass globe model seemed to be an inexpensive educational tool to practice the first steps of cystoscopy. It may reduce training time on the UM simulator. The combined use of a low- and high-fidelity training model may provide an optimal learning effect.
    Simulation in healthcare: journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare 08/2010; 5(4):213-8. DOI:10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181e1b73d · 1.48 Impact Factor
  • Medical Teacher 02/2011; 33(2):97-8. DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2011.550971 · 1.68 Impact Factor
Show more