The meaning of 'fruits' and 'vegetables'

Risk Factor Monitoring and Methods Branch, Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, US National Cancer Institute, 6130 Executive Blvd/EPN 4095A MSC 7344, Bethesda, MD 20892-7344, USA.
Public Health Nutrition (Impact Factor: 2.68). 07/2011; 14(7):1222-8. DOI: 10.1017/S136898001000368X
Source: PubMed


Fruit and vegetable consumption is a focus of research and nutrition education; yet, there is no universal agreement on the meaning of 'fruits' and 'vegetables'. Our objective was to describe survey respondent perceptions about a set of foods with regard to whether the food is a fruit, vegetable or something else.
Three cross-sectional studies.
Two small studies involving cognitive interviewing sessions; and one large self-administered population survey.
US adults in two small studies (n 55 and 80) and one large survey (n 3312), all with multiple race/ethnicities.
Perceptions varied. In the survey, rice was considered a vegetable by about 20 % of respondents. In one small study, Spanish speakers were more likely to consider rice a vegetable, and Chinese speakers less likely, than were English speakers. Black beans were frequently classified as something other than vegetable or fruit. Among Hispanics, Spanish speakers were less likely than English speakers to consider beans a vegetable. Overall, tomatoes were classified as both fruit and vegetable, and these perceptions varied by race/ethnicity.
Substantial disagreement among the fruit, vegetable and other food domains highlights the importance of clearly defining the desired constructs. Foods that require specific instruction include rice, dried beans, potatoes, tomatoes and fruits and vegetables in mixtures and condiments. For measurement, additional questions or explanations may be needed to clarify which foods are of interest. For communication, the global message to increase consumption of fruit and vegetables should be reinforced with specific guidance.

Download full-text


Available from: Frances E Thompson, Jan 08, 2014
  • Source
    • "Responses to each item were converted into servings of fruits or vegetables per day by multiplying daily average frequency by the number of portion sizes. Given the U.S. Dietary Guidelines recommend five servings of fruits or vegetables per day among adults, we constructed a dichotomous variable (0 = not met the recommendation, 1 = met the recommendation) based on the number of servings of fruits or vegetables a day (Thompson et al. 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Increasing obesity levels portend a challenging societal healthcare issue, while the current economic crisis may foster food insecurity, characterized by limited or uncertain access to adequate food. This study examines associations among food insecurity, meeting recommendations for dietary and physical activity patterns, and body mass index (BMI) among baby boomers and older adults completing the 2010 Brazos Valley Health Survey. Subjects included 2,985 respondents (1,589 baby boomers and 1,396 older adults). Thirty-six percent of participants were obese while 15 % of participants were food insecure. Approximately 8 % of baby boomers and older adults were both food insecure and obese. Among all study participants, an increased BMI was more common among those who were ethnic minorities and had depression. An increased BMI was less common among those who met fruit/vegetable intake and physical activity recommendations. There was a positive association between food insecurity and BMI only among baby boomer and older adult females. A combined emphasis on availability of healthy foods and increased opportunities for meeting physical activity guidelines can help to counter the food insecurity-obesity connection among both baby boomer and older adult females.
    Food Security 06/2014; 6(3):423-433. DOI:10.1007/s12571-014-0344-6 · 1.50 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "which estimate path coefficients in multiple mediator models and provide bootstrap confidence intervals for indirect effects. In this meditational model, gender was the independent variable; attitudes, perceived behavioral control, and perceived norms were mediators; and covariates included age, education level, ethnicity/race, and geographic location (see Blanck et al., 2011, and Thompson, Willis et al., 2011, for prior use of these covariates in the FAB survey). We used Hayes and Preacher's (2011) ‗INDIRECT SPSS' macro to compute parameter estimates and confidence intervals. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A gender difference in fruit and vegetable intake (FVI) is widely documented, but not well understood. Using data from the National Cancer Institute's Food Attitudes and Behavior Survey, we assessed the extent to which gender differences in FVI are attributable to gender differences in constructs from the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Females reported more favorable attitudes and greater perceived behavior control regarding FVI than males, and these beliefs mediated the observed gender difference. Males reported greater perceived norms for FVI, but norms did not predict FVI. Gender did not moderate the influence of TPB constructs on FVI. Thus, TPB constructs substantially explained the gender difference. Interventions targeted toward adult males may benefit by promoting favorable attitudes and perceived behavioral control over FVI.
    Appetite 08/2012; 59(3):693-697. DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2012.08.007 · 2.69 Impact Factor
  • Source

    Public Health Nutrition 09/2011; 14(9):1511-2. DOI:10.1017/S136898001100190X · 2.68 Impact Factor
Show more