Adolescent development of psychosis as an outcome of hearing impairment: A 10-year longitudinal study

Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, South Limburg Mental Health Research and Teaching Network, EURON Graduate School of Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Psychological Medicine (Impact Factor: 5.94). 03/2011; 41(3):477-85. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291710000978
Source: PubMed


It has long been acknowledged that hearing impairment may increase the risk for psychotic experiences. Recent work suggests that young people in particular may be at risk, indicating a possible developmental mechanism.
The hypothesis that individuals exposed to hearing impairment in early adolescence would display the highest risk for psychotic symptoms was examined in a prospective cohort study of a population sample of originally 3021 adolescents and young adults aged 14-24 years at baseline, in Munich, Germany (Early Developmental Stages of Psychopathology Study). The expression of psychosis was assessed at multiple time points over a period of up to 10 years, using a diagnostic interview (Munich Composite International Diagnostic Interview; CIDI) administered by clinical psychologists.
Hearing impairment was associated with CIDI psychotic symptoms [odds ratio (OR) 2.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-3.81], particularly more severe psychotic symptoms (OR 5.66, 95% CI 1.64-19.49). The association between hearing impairment and CIDI psychotic symptoms was much stronger in the youngest group aged 14-17 years at baseline (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.54-7.01) than in the older group aged 18-24 years at baseline (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.24-2.84).
The finding of an age-specific association between hearing impairment and psychotic experiences suggests that disruption of development at a critical adolescent phase, in interaction with other personal and social vulnerabilities, may increase the risk for psychotic symptoms.

Download full-text


Available from: Margriet van der Werf,
50 Reads
  • Source
    • "In all these manifestations diminished self-perception is analogous to 'diminished presence' (Sass and Parnas, 2003; Cermolacce et al., 2007; Gallagher, 2005). When hearing or vision is impaired, risk for schizophrenia is higher (Butler and Javitt, 2005; Schubert et al., 2005; Schiffman et al., 2006; Silverstein et al., 2006; Senkowski et al., 2007; Javitt, 2009; Chen, 2011; van der Werf et al., 2011; Silverstein et al., 2012). In schizophrenia (without evident impairment of hearing or vision), many audio–visual integration disturbances have been demonstrated. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this review is to describe the potential relationship between multisensory disintegration and self-disorders in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Sensory processing impairments affecting multisensory integration have been demonstrated in schizophrenia. From a developmental perspective multisensory integration is considered to be crucial for normal self-experience. An impairment of multisensory integration is called 'perceptual incoherence'. We theorize that perceptual incoherence may evoke incoherent self-experiences including depersonalization, ambivalence, diminished sense of agency, and 'loosening of associations' between thoughts, feelings and actions that lie within the framework of 'self-disorders' as described by Sass and Parnas (2003). We postulate that subconscious attempts to restore perceptual coherence may induce hallucinations and delusions. Increased insight into mechanisms underlying 'self-disorders' may enhance our understanding of schizophrenia, improve recognition of early psychosis, and extend the range of therapeutic possibilities.
    Schizophrenia Research 08/2013; 152(1). DOI:10.1016/j.schres.2013.07.027 · 3.92 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The most important risk factor for schizophrenia is a positive family history, but only a minority of people with schizophrenia have an affected relative and no single gene of large effect has been consistently associated with psychosis risk. Epidemiological research has elucidated putative biological and psychosocial candidate risk factors for schizophrenia. Biological factors include advanced paternal age, exposure to obstetric events and abuse of drugs such as stimulants and cannabis. Recent evidence indicates that social factors such as migration, urban living and victimization also increase the risk. However, neither individual susceptibility genes nor individual environmental risk factors appear sufficient or necessary to cause schizophrenia. Both genetic and environmental risk factors are mostly of small effect, but the latter offer more tangible targets for prevention.
    10/2011; 1(5):457-466. DOI:10.2217/npy.11.42
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nuevo R, Van Os J, Arango C, Chatterji S, Ayuso-Mateos JL. Evidence for the early clinical relevance of hallucinatory-delusional states in the general population. Objective: To analyze, in a general population sample, clustering of delusional and hallucinatory experiences in relation to environmental exposures and clinical parameters. Method: General population-based household surveys of randomly selected adults between 18 and 65 years of age were carried out. Setting: 52 countries participating in the World Health Organization’s World Health Survey were included. Participants: 225 842 subjects (55.6% women), from nationally representative samples, with an individual response rate of 98.5% within households participated. Results: Compared with isolated delusions and hallucinations, co-occurrence of the two phenomena was associated with poorer outcome including worse general health and functioning status (OR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.92–0.93), greater severity of symptoms (OR = 2.5 95% CI: 2.0–3.0), higher probability of lifetime diagnosis of psychotic disorder (OR = 12.9; 95% CI: 11.5–14.4), lifetime treatment for psychotic disorder (OR = 19.7; 95% CI: 17.3–22.5), and depression during the last 12 months (OR = 11.6; 95% CI: 10.9–12.4). Co-occurrence was also associated with adversity and hearing problems (OR = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.8–2.3). Conclusion: The results suggest that the co-occurrence of hallucinations and delusions in populations is not random but instead can be seen, compared with either phenomenon in isolation, as the result of more etiologic loading leading to a more severe clinical state.
    Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 09/2012; 127(6). DOI:10.1111/acps.12010 · 5.61 Impact Factor
Show more