Interactive use of communication by verbal and non-verbal autistic children

Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciencias Humanas, Universidade de São Paulo.
Pró-fono: revista de atualização científica 12/2010; 22(4):373-8. DOI: 10.1590/S0104-56872010000400002
Source: PubMed


Communication of autistic children.
To assess the communication functionality of verbal and non-verbal children of the autistic spectrum and to identify possible associations amongst the groups.
Subjects were 20 children of the autistic spectrum divided into two groups: V with 10 verbal children and NV with 10 non-verbal children with ages varying between 2y10m and 10y6m. All subjects were video recorded during 30 minutes of spontaneous interaction with their mothers. The samples were analyzed according to the functional communicative profile and comparisons within and between groups were conducted.
Data referring to the occupation of communicative space suggest that there is an even balance between each child and his mother. The number of communicative acts per minute shows a clear difference between verbal and non-verbal children. Both verbal and non-verbal children use mostly the gestual communicative mean in their interactions. Data about the use of interpersonal communicative functions point out to the autistic children's great interactive impairment.
The characterization of the functional communicative profile proposed in this study confirmed the autistic children's difficulties with interpersonal communication and that these difficulties do not depend on the preferred communicative mean.

Download full-text


Available from: Cibelle Albuquerque de la Higuera Amato, Apr 16, 2015
  • Source
    • "A study, from Switzerland, showed both male and female doctors should display different set of nonverbal behavior to maximize patients satisfaction [5]. Nonverbal communication has been shown to be important in dealing with pediatric age groups [6] and with those recovering from disabilities [7] [8] [9]. Eye contact and physical touch are commonly used as effective tools in nonverbal communication [1] [10]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background. Nonverbal behaviors have a significant impact on patients during consultations. This study was undertaken to find out the attitudes and preferences of the patients regarding nonverbal communication during consultations with physicians, in a tertiary care hospital. Methods. A questionnaire based cross-sectional study was carried out at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, during the months of January to March 2012. All patients (>18 years of age) coming for consultancy in the family medicine clinics were approached; out of 133, 120 agreed to participate. The subjects were asked questions regarding physician's comforting touch and eye contact and their responses were noted. The data were analyzed using SPSS and chi-square test was used to identify corelations. Results. Overall, 120 patients were enrolled. About 58.3% were men and 41.7% were women with a mean age of 34.9 ± 10.9 years. 95.8% were Muslims and 57.6% had more than 12 years of education. Among females 74% wanted supportive touch from doctors, used to comfort the patient (45%) or to show respect (27.5%) or as healing (30%). 86.1% of the respondents believe that establishing eye contact with the patient shows that the doctor is attentive towards his/her patient. The eye contact should be brief but regular (54.1%) and prolonged staring (36.7%) makes them uncomfortable. Conclusion. Nonverbal communication helps to strengthen the doctor-patient relation as patients do appreciate positive touch and eye contact from their physicians.
    02/2014; 2014:473654. DOI:10.1155/2014/473654
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Language abnormalities in autism spectrum disorder show diversity in their interpretation as well as complexity regarding their evaluation processes. The contribution of the speech therapist in multidisciplinary diagnostic process emphasizes the need to assess the parameters of sociopragmatic nature.
    Revista de Logopedia, Foniatria y Audiologia 05/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.rlfa.2015.02.001