Article

Islet autoantibody seroconversion in the DPT-1 study: justification for repeat screening throughout childhood.

Pediatrics Epidemiology Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Diabetes care (Impact Factor: 7.74). 02/2011; 34(2):358-62. DOI: 10.2337/dc10-1494
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although type 1 diabetes autoimmunity frequently begins in childhood, little is known about the relationship between age and autoimmunity development. Our aim was to determine the timing of seroconversion to diabetes-associated autoantibody (DAA) positivity and risk in first- and second-degree relatives of patients with type 1 diabetes.
Study subjects were identified through the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 (DPT-1). Children 3-18 years of age (n = 42,447) were screened for DAAs; 1,454 were ICA positive (≥ 10 JDF units), 1,758 were GAD65 positive, and 899 were ICA512 positive at the time of initial screening. Subjects who were initially antibody negative (n = 39,212) were recalled for rescreening, and 11,813 returned for rescreening.
DAA seroconversion occurred in 469 (4%) children; 258 seroconverted to ICA, 234 to GAD65, and 99 to ICA512. The median time to seroconversion was 2 years. The 2-year risk for DAAs was highest in early childhood. For each 1-year increase in age in this cohort, the risk of any autoantibody seroconversion (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.97) decreased by 5%, and for any two autoantibodies risk decreased by 13% (0.87, 0.82-0.93).
Risk of autoantibody seroconversion among children followed in DPT-1 is age dependent. Younger children have the highest risk for DAAs, with the majority of children seroconverting by 13 years of age (75%). This suggests that annual screenings should be started in early childhood and continued through early adolescence to identify the majority of subjects at risk for type 1 diabetes and eligible for prevention trials.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
111 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The digestive tract hosts trillions of bacteria that interact with the immune system and can influence the balance between pro-inflammatory and regulatory immune responses. Recent studies suggest that alterations in the composition of the intestinal microbiota may be linked with the development of type 1 diabetes (T1D). Data from the biobreeding diabetes prone (BBDP) and the LEW1.WR1 models of T1D support the hypothesis that intestinal bacteria may be involved in early disease mechanisms. The data indicate that cross-talk between the gut microbiota and the innate immune system may be involved in islet destruction. Whether a causal link between intestinal microbiota and T1D exists, the identity of the bacteria and the mechanism whereby they promote the disease remain to be examined. A better understanding of the interplay between microbes and innate immune pathways in early disease stages holds promise for the design of immune interventions and disease prevention in genetically susceptible individuals.
    Clinical Immunology 12/2012; 146(2):112-119. DOI:10.1016/j.clim.2012.12.001 · 3.77 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Discuss recent data linking the intestinal microbiome with mechanisms of inflammation and islet destruction. RECENT FINDINGS: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a proinflammatory disease that results in the loss of insulin-producing beta cells. How T1D is triggered is unclear; however, both genetic and environmental factors were implicated in disease mechanisms. Emerging evidence supports the notion that there is a complex interaction between the intestinal microbiome and the immune system and this cross-talk is involved in maintaining normal immune homeostasis in the gut and periphery. Under some circumstances the gut microbiota could lead to pathogenic immune responses resulting in inflammation in the intestine as well as other organs. Indeed, recent data from genetically susceptible individuals suggested that alterations in gut bacterial communities may be involved in the mechanism of islet destruction. Studies performed in animal models of T1D indicated that manipulating the gut microbiome can protect from islet destruction via mechanisms that may involve down-regulating both the adaptive and innate immune systems. SUMMARY: Further work is required to identify specific bacterial communities and mechanisms involved in triggering T1D. A better knowledge of the role of the gut microbiome in islet destruction could lead to new clinical interventions to restore healthy homeostasis and prevent disease development.
    Current opinion in endocrinology, diabetes, and obesity 06/2013; DOI:10.1097/MED.0b013e3283628569 · 3.77 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The intestinal microbiota is essential to the maturation and homeostasis of the immune system. Immunoblot assays were used to establish the prevalence of serum IgG, IgM, and IgA antibodies specific for Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Bifidobacterium longum, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG proteins in young children presenting with or without type 1 diabetes (T1D). We demonstrated that children between the ages of 6 and 12 months had a substantial increase in the frequency of IgG antibodies specific for L. rhamnosus GG proteins. We measured IgG, IgM, and IgA class antibody reactivity against B. adolescentis DSM 20083, B. adolescentis DSM 20086, and B. longum DSM 20088 proteins demonstrating significantly higher IgA responses against B. adolescentis DSM 20083 strain proteins in children who developed islet autoimmunity and T1D later in life. B. adolescentis strains showed more IgM type antibodies in children who developed T1D later in life, but the difference was not statistically significant. B. longum proteins were recognized by IgG and IgA antibodies to a higher extent compared to other bacteria studied. These results confirm that differences in immune reactivity against some commensal strains in young children may represent a different risk factor for developing T1D.
    Journal of Immunology Research 03/2014; 2014:325938. DOI:10.1155/2014/325938 · 2.93 Impact Factor
    This article is viewable in ResearchGate's enriched format

Full-text (3 Sources)

Download
43 Downloads
Available from
Jun 1, 2014