HLTF and SHPRH are not essential for PCNA polyubiquitination, survival and somatic hypermutation: existence of an alternative E3 ligase.

Division of Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
DNA repair (Impact Factor: 3.36). 04/2011; 10(4):438-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.12.008
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT DNA damage tolerance is regulated at least in part at the level of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) ubiquitination. Monoubiquitination (PCNA-Ub) at lysine residue 164 (K164) stimulates error-prone translesion synthesis (TLS), Rad5-dependent polyubiquitination (PCNA-Ub(n)) stimulates error-free template switching (TS). To generate high affinity antibodies by somatic hypermutation (SHM), B cells profit from error-prone TLS polymerases. Consistent with the role of PCNA-Ub in stimulating TLS, hypermutated B cells of PCNA(K164R) mutant mice display a defect in generating selective point mutations. Two Rad5 orthologs, HLTF and SHPRH have been identified as alternative E3 ligases generating PCNA-Ub(n) in mammals. As PCNA-Ub and PCNA-Ub(n) both make use of K164, error-free PCNA-Ub(n)-dependent TS may suppress error-prone PCNA-Ub-dependent TLS. To determine a regulatory role of Shprh and Hltf in SHM, we generated Shprh/Hltf double mutant mice. Interestingly, while the formation of PCNA-Ub and PCNA-Ub(n) is prohibited in PCNA(K164R) MEFs, the formation of PCNA-Ub(n) is not abolished in Shprh/Hltf mutant MEFs. In line with these observations Shprh/Hltf double mutant B cells were not hypersensitive to DNA damage. Furthermore, SHM was normal in Shprh/Hltf mutant B cells. These data suggest the existence of an alternative E3 ligase in the generation of PCNA-Ub(n).

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This review focuses on eukaryotic DNA polymerase ζ (Pol ζ), the enzyme responsible for the bulk of mutagenesis in eukaryotic cells in response to DNA damage. Pol ζ is also responsible for a large portion of mutagenesis during normal cell growth, in response to spontaneous damage or to certain DNA structures and other blocks that stall DNA replication forks. Novel insights in mutagenesis have been derived from recent advances in the elucidation of the subunit structure of Pol ζ. The lagging strand DNA polymerase δ shares the small Pol31 and Pol32 subunits with the Rev3-Rev7 core assembly giving a four subunit Pol ζ complex that is the active form in mutagenesis. Furthermore, Pol ζ forms essential interactions with the mutasome assembly factor Rev1 and with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). These interactions are modulated by posttranslational modifications such as ubiquitination and phosphorylation that enhance translesion synthesis (TLS) and mutagenesis. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    DNA Repair 02/2015; 29. DOI:10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.02.012 · 3.36 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Posttranslational modification of proteins often controls various aspects of their cellular function. Indeed, over the past decade or so, it has been discovered that posttranslational modification of lysine residues plays a major role in regulating translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) and perhaps the most appreciated lysine modification is that of ubiquitination. Much of the recent interest in ubiquitination stems from the fact that proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) was previously shown to be specifically ubiquitinated at K164 and that such ubiquitination plays a key role in regulating TLS. In addition, TLS polymerases themselves are now known to be ubiquitinated. In the case of human polymerase η, ubiquitination at four lysine residues in its C-terminus appears to regulate its ability to interact with PCNA and modulate TLS. Within the past few years, advances in global proteomic research have revealed that many proteins involved in TLS are, in fact, subject to a previously underappreciated number of lysine modifications. In this review, we will summarize the known lysine modifications of several key proteins involved in TLS; PCNA and Y-family polymerases η, ι, κ and Rev1 and we will discuss the potential regulatory effects of such modification in controlling TLS in vivo. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    DNA Repair 02/2015; 29. DOI:10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.02.011 · 3.36 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: During replication, bypass of DNA lesions is orchestrated by the Rad6 pathway. Monoubiquitination of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) by Rad6/Rad18 leads to recruitment of translesion polymerases for direct and potentially mutagenic damage bypass. An error-free bypass pathway may be initiated via K63-linked PCNA polyubiquitination by Ubc13/Mms2 and the E3 ligase Rad5 in yeast, or HLTF/SHPRH in vertebrates. For the latter two enzymes, redundancy with a third E3 ligase and alternative functions have been reported. We have previously shown that the Rad6 pathway is involved in somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes in B lymphocytes. Here, we have used knockout strategies targeting expression of the entire SHPRH protein or functionally significant domains in chicken DT40 cells that do not harbor a HLTF ortholog. We show that SHPRH is apparently redundant with another E3 ligase during DNA damage-induced PCNA modification. SHPRH plays no substantial role in cellular resistance to drugs initiating excision repair and the Rad6 pathway, but is important in survival of topoisomerase II inhibitor treatment. Removal of only the C-terminal RING domain does not interfere with this SHPRH function. SHPRH inactivation does not substantially impact on the overall efficacy of Ig diversification. Redundancy of E3 ligases in the Rad6 pathway may be linked to its different functions in genome maintenance and genetic plasticity.
    DNA Repair 10/2014; 24. DOI:10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.09.010 · 3.36 Impact Factor