Article
The Professional Athlete Spine Initiative: outcomes after lumbar disc herniation in 342 elite professional athletes.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St. Clair St, Ste 1350, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society (impact factor:
2.9).
01/2011;
11(3):180-6.
DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2010.12.009
pp.180-6
Source: PubMed
- Citations (15)
-
Cited In (0)
-
Article: The effect of spinal steroid injections for degenerative disc disease.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: No conclusive evidence exists to determine that spinal steroid injections give lasting improvement in patients with predominantly axial low back pain resulting from lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD). The objectives of the study were to determine the effect of epidural steroid injections (ESIs) and intradiscal steroid injections (ISIs) in patients who exhibit DDD symptoms for more than 1 year and to determine whether patients with inflammatory end-plate changes are a unique subgroup of DDD patients in terms of treatment response. Pain and function in patients with DDD were prospectively assessed by an outcomes questionnaire before and after various spinal injections. Further correlation was made with end-plate inflammatory (Modic Type 1) changes identified on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). ESI was performed in 232 patients who were referred for treatment of DDD, and discography with or without intradiscal steroid was performed in 171 patients who were possible spinal arthrodesis candidates. Pain and function were determined by a self-administered outcomes questionnaire that consisted of a visual analog pain scale, pain drawing, Oswestry Disability Index, use of pain medication and opinion of treatment success. ESI was performed in 93 patients with DDD and inflammatory end-plate changes and in 139 patients without inflammatory end-plate changes. Patients with inflammatory end-plate changes (n=78) or without inflammatory end-plate changes (n=93), all of whom were considered fusion candidates, underwent discography with or without intradiscal steroid in a randomized fashion. Pain and function were prospectively determined by a self-administered outcomes survey (VAS pain, Oswestry Disability index [ODI], pain diagram [PD] and opinion of success) before and after the patients' injection for a 2-year follow-up period. MRI and discography results were correlated with patient outcomes scores. ESI was effective in improving pain and function, as assessed by outcomes scores at short-term follow-up. However, at 2 years, less than one-third had not had additional invasive treatment. Patients with inflammatory end-plate changes had greater improvement in ODI and PD scores in the first 6 months than did those patients without the end-plate changes. Intradiscal steroid injections into discs with concordant pain at the time of discography led to significant improvement in patients with inflammatory end-plate changes in all outcomes scales, but only minimal temporary improvement in patients without the end-plate changes. Disc pressure manometry at the time of discography found that discs with adjacent inflammatory end-plate changes reproduced symptoms at pressures significantly lower than those in other types of discs. Spinal steroid injections, both ESI and ISI, are beneficial for a small number of patients with advanced DDD and chronic low back pain. For those patients in whom a beneficial effect is found, spinal steroid injection is a low-risk and rapid treatment option. Spinal steroid injections are more effective in patients with MRI findings of discogenic inflammation, specifically adjacent inflammatory end-plate changes.The Spine Journal 4(5):495-505. · 3.29 Impact Factor -
Article: Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Two hundred eighty patients with herniated lumbar discs, verified by radiculography, were divided into three groups. One group, which mainly will be dealt with in this paper, consisted of 126 patients with uncertain indication for surgical treatment, who had their therapy decided by randomization which permitted comparison between the results of surgical and conservative treatment. Another group comprising 67 patients had symptoms and signs that beyond doubt, required surgical therapy. The third group of 87 patients was treated conservatively because there was no indication for operative intervention. Follow-up examinations in the first group were performed after one, four, and ten years. The controlled trial showed a statistically significant better result in the surgically treated group at the one-year follow-up examination. After four years the operated patients still showed better results, but the difference was no longer statistically significant. Only minor changes took place during the last six years of observation.Spine 04/1983; 8(2):131-40. · 2.08 Impact Factor -
Article: Effectiveness of microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a randomized controlled trial with 2 years of follow-up.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Prospective randomized controlled trial. To assess effectiveness of microdiscectomy in lumbar disc herniation patients with 6 to 12 weeks of symptoms but no absolute indication for surgery. There is limited evidence in favor of discectomy for prolonged symptoms of lumbar disc herniation. However, only one randomized trial has directly compared discectomy with conservative treatment. Fifty-six patients (age range, 20-50 years) with a lumbar disc herniation, clinical findings of nerve root compression, and radicular pain lasting 6 to 12 weeks were randomized to microdiscectomy or conservative management. Fifty patients (89%) were available at the 2-year follow-up. Leg pain intensity was the primary outcome measure. There were no clinically significant differences between the groups in leg or back pain intensity, subjective disability, or health-related quality of life over the 2-year follow-up, although discectomy seemed to be associated with a more rapid initial recovery. In a subgroup analysis, discectomy was superior to conservative treatment when the herniation was at L4-L5. Lumbar microdiscectomy offered only modest short-term benefits in patients with sciatica due to disc extrusion or sequester. Spinal level of the herniation may be an important factor modifying effectiveness of surgery, but this hypothesis needs verification.Spine 11/2006; 31(21):2409-14. · 2.08 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
342 professional athletes
active 2 years
Cox proportional hazards models
different physical demands
elite professional athletes
games/regular season
higher RTP rate
Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve
lower RTP rate
lumbar discectomy
major North American sports
mixed regression analyses
NFL players
posttreatment careers
professional athletes
Retrospective cohort study
shorter career
shorter careers
Statistical significance
statistically significant differences