Determination of whole-brain oxygen extraction fractions by fast measurement of blood T(2) in the jugular vein.

The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of MR Research, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.4). 02/2011; 65(2):471-9. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22556
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The oxygen extraction fraction of the brain reports on the balance between oxygen delivery and consumption and can be used to assess deviations in physiological homeostasis. This is relevant clinically as well as for calibrating blood oxygen level-dependent functional MRI responses. Oxygen extraction fraction is reflected in the arteriovenous difference in oxygen saturation fraction (Y(v) - Y(a) ), which can be determined from venous T(2) values when arterial oxygenation is known. A pulse sequence is presented that allows rapid measurement (<1 min) of blood T(2) s in the internal jugular vein. The technique combines slice-saturation and blood inflow to attain high signal-to-noise ratio in blood and minimal contamination from tissue. The sequence is sensitized to T(2) using a nonselective Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill T(2) preparation directly after slice saturation. Fast scanning (pulse repetition time of about 2 sec) is possible by using a nonselective saturation directly after acquisition to rapidly achieve steady-state longitudinal magnetization. The venous T(2) (for 10 msec Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill interecho time) for normal volunteers was 62.4 ± 6.1 msec (n = 20). A calibration curve relating T(2) to blood oxygenation was established using a blood perfusion phantom. Using this calibration, a whole-brain oxygen extraction fraction of 0.37 ± 0.04 was determined (n = 20), in excellent agreement with literature values.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Calibrated BOLD fMRI is a promising alternative to the classic BOLD contrast due to its reduced venous sensitivity and greater physiological specificity. The delayed adoption of this technique for cognitive studies may stem partly from a lack of information on the reproducibility of these measures in the context of cognitive tasks. In this study we have explored the applicability and reproducibility of a state-of-the-art calibrated BOLD technique using a complex functional task at 7 tesla. Reproducibility measures of BOLD, CBF, CMRO2 flow-metabolism coupling n and the calibration parameter M were compared and interpreted for three ROIs. We found an averaged intra-subject variation of CMRO2 of 8% across runs and 33% across days. BOLD (46% across runs, 36% across days), CBF (33% across runs, 46% across days) and M (41% across days) showed significantly higher intra-subject variability. Inter-subject variability was found to be high for all quantities, though CMRO2 was the most consistent across brain regions. The results of this study provide evidence that calibrated BOLD may be a viable alternative for longitudinal and cognitive MRI studies.
    NeuroImage 07/2014; 101. DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.072 · 6.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PurposeDevelop an MRI method to estimate skeletal muscle oxygen consumption (VO2) with dynamic exercise using simultaneous measurement of venous blood flow (VBF) and venous oxygen saturation (SvO2).Methods Real-time imaging of femoral VBF using a complex-difference method was interleaved with imaging of venous hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SvO2) using magnetic susceptometry to estimate muscle VO2 (Fick principle). Nine healthy subjects performed repeated 5-watt knee-extension (quadriceps) exercise within the bore of a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner, for test/re-test comparison. VBF, SvO2, and derived VO2 were estimated at baseline and immediately (<1 s) postexercise and every 2.4 s for 4 min.ResultsQuadriceps muscle mass was 2.43 ± 0.31 kg. Mean baseline values were VBF = 0.13 ± 0.06 L/min/kg, SvO2 = 69.4 ± 10.1%, and VO2 = 6.8 ± 4.1 mL/min/kg. VBF, SvO2, and VO2 values from peak exercise had good agreement between trials (VBF = 0.9 ± 0.1 versus 1.0 ± 0.1 L/min/kg, R2 = 0.83, CV = 7.6%; SvO2 = 43.2 ± 13.5 versus 40.9 ± 13.1%, R2 = 0.88, CV = 15.6%; VO2 = 95.7 ± 18.0 versus 108.9 ± 17.3 mL/min/kg, R2 = 0.88, CV = 12.3%), as did the VO2 recovery time constant (26.1 ± 3.5 versus 26.0 ± 4.0 s, R2 = 0.85, CV = 6.0%). CV = coefficient of variation.Conclusion Rapid imaging of VBF and SvO2 for the estimation of whole muscle VO2 is compatible with dynamic exercise for the estimation of peak values and recovery dynamics following exercise with good reproducibility. Magn Reson Med, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 12/2014; DOI:10.1002/mrm.25564 · 3.40 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Parenchymal extravascular R2 * is an important parameter for quantitative blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) studies. Total and intravascular R2 * values and changes in R2 * values during functional stimulations have been reported in a number of studies. The purpose of this study was to measure absolute extravascular R2 * values in human visual cortex and to estimate the intra- and extravascular contributions to the BOLD effect at 7 T. Vascular space occupancy (VASO) MRI was employed to separate out the extravascular tissue signal. Multi-echo VASO and BOLD functional MRI (fMRI) with visual stimulation were performed at 7 T for R2 * measurement at a spatial resolution of 2.5 × 2.5 × 2.5 mm(3) in healthy volunteers (n = 6). The ratio of changes in extravascular and total R2 * (ΔR2 *) was used to estimate the extravascular fraction of the BOLD effect. Extravascular R2 * values were found to be 44.66 ± 1.55 and 43.38 ± 1.51 s(-1) (mean ± standard error of the mean, n = 6) at rest and activation, respectively, in human visual cortex at 7 T. The extravascular BOLD fraction was estimated to be 91 ± 3%. The parenchymal oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) during activation was estimated to be 0.24 ± 0.01 based on the R2 * measurements, indicating an approximately 37% decrease compared with OEF at rest. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    NMR in Biomedicine 02/2015; 28(2). DOI:10.1002/nbm.3250 · 3.56 Impact Factor


Available from