Electronic Health Records and Clinical Decision Support Systems Impact on National Ambulatory Care Quality

Program on Prevention Outcomes and Practices, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, USA.
Archives of internal medicine (Impact Factor: 13.25). 05/2011; 171(10):897-903. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.527
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Electronic health records (EHRs) are increasingly used by US outpatient physicians. They could improve clinical care via clinical decision support (CDS) and electronic guideline-based reminders and alerts. Using nationally representative data, we tested the hypothesis that a higher quality of care would be associated with EHRs and CDS.
We analyzed physician survey data on 255,402 ambulatory patient visits in nonfederal offices and hospitals from the 2005-2007 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Based on 20 previously developed quality indicators, we assessed the relationship of EHRs and CDS to the provision of guideline-concordant care using multivariable logistic regression.
Electronic health records were used in 30% of an estimated 1.1 billion annual US patient visits. Clinical decision support was present in 57% of these EHR visits (17% of all visits). The use of EHRs and CDS was more likely in the West and in multiphysician settings than in solo practices. In only 1 of 20 indicators was quality greater in EHR visits than in non-EHR visits (diet counseling in high-risk adults, adjusted odds ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-2.26). Among the EHR visits, only 1 of 20 quality indicators showed significantly better performance in visits with CDS compared with EHR visits without CDS (lack of routine electrocardiographic ordering in low-risk patients, adjusted odds ratio, 2.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.69-4.90). There were no other significant quality differences.
Our findings indicate no consistent association between EHRs and CDS and better quality. These results raise concerns about the ability of health information technology to fundamentally alter outpatient care quality.

Download full-text


Available from: Max J Romano, Mar 02, 2015
  • Source
    • "Computers have helped implement clinical guidelines and improved clinical care [11] [12]. They have supported clinical decision-making [13] [14]. A systematic review reported a significant improvement in care after the implementation of computerized clinical guidelines [15]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite the widely held belief that the computerization of hospital medical systems contributes to improved patient care management, especially in the context of ordering medications and record keeping, extensive study of the attitudes of medical staff to computerization has found them to be negative. The views of nursing staff have been barely studied and so are unclear. The study reported here investigated the association between nurses’ current computer use and skills, the extent of their involvement in quality control and improvement activities on the ward and their perception of the contribution of computerization to improving nursing care. The study was made in the context of a Joint Commission International Accreditation (JCIA) in a large tertiary medical center in Israel. The perception of the role of leadership commitment in the success of a quality initiative was also tested for.
    International Journal of Medical Informatics 12/2014; 83(12). DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.08.001 · 2.72 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Most of these approaches address a specific application or problem domain [6][19], which influence the techniques chosen for knowledge acquisition, representation and communication [1]. For example, DSSs exist today for medical diagnostics [19], management decision making [20], and geographic systems [6]. However, very few of these systems provide guidance for strategic decision making i.e., to explore probable options and interactively guide the user to arrive at a decision specifically for systems management. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Information systems today have become incredibly complex and span multiple organizational networks, database and applications servers and on to the external Internet cloud resources. Consequently strategic approaches are needed to troubleshoot system failures by first identifying the component causing the failure, and thereby, further investigating the cause of the failure to solve the problem. Information regarding past troubleshooting strategies can be used to provide guidance for solving similar problems. We present a framework, DSDAware (Decision Support for Database Administrators using Warehouse-as-a-service) for developing a Decision Guidance and Support System (DGSS). The framework dynamically extracts knowledge from various correlated data sources containing systems related data and from the problem solving procedures of the human experts. The knowledge is used in a strategic problem solving approach to train new administrators by guiding them through the troubleshooting process using an interactive interface, and to offer a decision support service to the Web community. Our work specifically focuses on z/OS Mainframe DB2 database (DB) problems where the inherent complexity of the system makes troubleshooting a challenging task. The diminishing population of mainframe DB administrators (DBA) asserts the need for a DGSS for the new DBAs. The research applies text and data mining techniques for knowledge extraction, a rule-based system for knowledge representation and problem categorization, and a case-based system for providing decision support.
    Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW), 2012 IEEE 28th International Conference on; 01/2012
  • Source
Show more