Impact of Blood Transfusion on Early Outcome of Liver Resection for Colorectal Hepatic Metastases

Istituto Mediterraneo Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center in Italy, Palermo, Italy.
Journal of Surgical Oncology (Impact Factor: 3.24). 02/2011; 103(2):140-7. DOI: 10.1002/jso.21796
Source: PubMed


The use of intra-operative blood transfusion has been associated with worse surgical outcome in patients undergoing liver resection for malignancy.
In a series of 127 consecutive patients who underwent partial liver resection for colorectal metastases, between July 1999 and March 2010, we studied, post-operative 90 days surgical outcome using Clavien multi-tier grading system, and the effect of a variety of related factors, including type of resection, surgical technique used, concomitant colo-rectal resection, non-tumoral hepatic histological findings, site of primary tumor, and comorbidities, on the incidence of intra-operative blood transfusion.
Patients who received blood transfusions during their liver resection were more likely to have a longer post-operative length of stay, to experience Clavien Grade IIIa or worse complication. Undergoing a major resection and the presence of portal fibrosis in the non-tumoral liver tissue were both correlated with an increase in intra-operative blood transfusions.
These clinical findings suggest that although several significant factors do not seem to influence the short-term outcome of surgery, it is important to be aware of the deleterious effects of the type of resection performed and the presence of portal fibrosis on blood loss during partial liver resection.

9 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the past two decades, hepatic surgery has achieved important technical breakthroughs resulting in a drastic reduction of the onset of complications and in an improved post-resective survival. Pre-operative nutritional status is one of the key points for the success of a liver resection. Modern surgical achievement such as the development of living-related liver donation, and the possibility to perform more laparoscopic liver resection gave us the opportunity to extend post-operative protocol focused on early intestinal feeding to tumor patients. The aims of this review were to report the current status of the knowledge regarding nutritional aspects in liver resection patients.
    11/2011; 63(4):249-52. DOI:10.1007/s13304-011-0121-4
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The relationship between neo-adjuvant chemotherapy prior to hepatectomy in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases and post-operative morbidity still has to be clarified. Data from 242 patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases, judged resectable at first observation, were reviewed and their clinical outcome was related to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (125 patients). Selection biases were outlined and properly handled by means of propensity score analysis. Post-operative death was 1.2% and morbidity 40.9%. Pre-operative chemotherapy was only apparently related to higher morbidity (P = 0.021): multivariate analysis identified extension of hepatectomy and intra-operative blood loss as independent prognostic variables (P < 0.05). Patients receiving and not receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly different for several covariates, including extension of hepatectomy (P = 0.049). After propensity score adjustment, 94 patients were identified as having similar covariate distribution (standardized differences <|0.1|) except for neo-adjuvant treatment (47 patients for each group). In this matched sample, mortality was similar and post-operative complications were only slightly higher (hazard ratio = 1.38) in treated patients. A significantly higher need for fluid replacement was only observed in patients receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.038). Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy showed a limited role in determining post-operative morbidity after hepatic resection and did not modify mortality.
    Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery 12/2011; 397(3):397-405. DOI:10.1007/s00423-011-0894-4 · 2.19 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In recent years the advent of programs for enhanced recovery after major surgery (ERAS) has led to modifications of long-standing and well-established perioperative treatments. These programs are used to target factors that have been shown to delay postoperative recovery (pain, gut dysfunction, immobility) and combine a series of interventions to reduce perioperative stress and organ dysfunction. With due differences, the programs of enhanced recovery are generally based on the preoperative amelioration of the patient's clinical conditions with whom they present for the operation, on the intraoperative and postoperative avoidance of medications that could slow the resumption of physiological activities, and on the promotion of positive habits in the early postoperative period. Most of the studies were conducted on elective patients undergoing colorectal procedures (either laparotomic or laparoscopic surgery). Results showed that ERAS protocols significantly improved the lung function and reduced the time to resumption of oral diet, mobilization and passage of stool, hospital stay and return to normal activities. ERAS' acceptance is spreading quickly among major centers, as well as district hospitals. With this in mind, is there also a role for ERAS in non-colorectal operations?
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 01/2012; 18(3):205-11. DOI:10.3748/wjg.v18.i3.205 · 2.37 Impact Factor
Show more