Aromaticity in Group 14 Homologues of the Cyclopropenylium Cation

Dpto Química Orgánica I, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Chemistry - A European Journal (Impact Factor: 5.73). 02/2011; 17(7):2215-24. DOI: 10.1002/chem.201001392
Source: PubMed


The nature of the bonding and the aromaticity of the heavy Group 14 homologues of cyclopropenylium cations E3H3+ and E2H2E'H+ (E, E' = C-Pb) have been investigated systematically at the BP86/TZ2P DFT level by using several methods. Aromatic stabilization energies (ASE) were evaluated from the values obtained from energy decomposition analysis (EDA) of charged acyclic reference molecules. The EDA-ASE results compare well with the extra cyclic resonance energy (ECRE) values given by the block localized wavefunction (BLW) method. Although all compounds investigated are Hückel 4n+2 π electron species, their ASEs indicate that the inclusion of Group 14 elements heavier than carbon reduces the aromaticity; the parent C3H3+ ion and Si2H2CH+ are the most aromatic, and Pb3H3+ is the least so. The higher energies for the cyclopropenium analogues reported in 1995 employed an isodesmic scheme, and are reinterpreted by using the BLW method. The decrease in the strength of both the π cyclic conjugation and the aromaticity in the order C ≫ Si>Ge>Sn>Pb agrees reasonably well with the trends given by the refined nucleus-independent chemical shift NICS(0)πzz index.

292 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Quantitative evaluations of the aromaticity (antiaromaticity) of neutral exocyclic substituted cyclopropenes (HC)(2)C=X (X = BH to InH (group 13), CH(2) to SnH(2) (group 14), NH to SbH (group 15), O to Te (group 16)) by their computed extra cyclic resonance energies (ECRE, via the block-localized wave function method) and by their aromatic stabilization energies (ASEs, via energy decomposition analyses) correlate satisfactorily (R(2) = 0.974). Electronegative X-based substituents increase the aromaticity of the cyclopropene rings, whereas electropositive substituents have the opposite effect. For example, (HC)(2)C=O is the most aromatic (ECRE = 10.3 kcal/mol), and (HC)(2)C=InH is the most antiaromatic (ECRE = -15.0 kcal/mol). The most refined dissected nucleus-independent chemical shift magnetic aromaticity index, NICS(0)(πzz), also agrees with both energetic indexes (R(2) = 0.968, for ECRE; R(2) = 0.974, for ASE), as do anisotropy of the induced current density plots.
    The Journal of Organic Chemistry 11/2010; 75(23):8252-7. DOI:10.1021/jo1020097 · 4.72 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Structural signatures: The analysis of Si-Si and Si-Li connectivities by solid-state NMR spectroscopy allows the different types of silicon clusters to be discriminated in the model lithium silicide compound Li(12)Si(7) (see picture, Si clusters red and blue, Li ions gray). The results provide new NMR spectroscopic strategies with which to differentiate and study the structures formed in silicon-based electrode materials.
    Angewandte Chemie International Edition 12/2011; 50(52):12591-4. DOI:10.1002/anie.201105998 · 11.26 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We have computationally explored the trend in reactivity of the Alder-ene reactions between propene and a series of seven enophiles using density functional theory at M06-2X/def2-TZVPP. The reaction barrier decreases along the enophiles in the order H(2) C=CH(2) > HC≡CH > H(2) C=NH > H(2) C=CH(COOCH(3) ) > H(2) C=O > H(2) C=PH > H(2) C=S. Thus, barriers drop in particular, if third-period atoms become involved in the double bond of the enophile. Activation-strain analyses show that this trend in reactivity correlates with the activation strain associated with deforming reactants from their equilibrium structure to the geometry they adopt in the transition state. We discuss the origin of this trend and its relationship with the extent of synchronicity between H transfer from ene to enophile and the formation of the new C−C bond.
    Journal of Computational Chemistry 02/2012; 33(5):509-16. DOI:10.1002/jcc.22877 · 3.59 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications