The role of changes in activity as a function of perceived available and expended energy in nonpharmacological treatment outcomes for ME/CFS.

DePaul University.
Journal of Clinical Psychology (Impact Factor: 2.12). 03/2011; 67(3):253-60. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20744
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Nonpharmacological interventions for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) often emphasize gradual increases in activity to promote improvement in physical functioning and fatigue. The energy envelope theory may provide a framework for understanding the relationship between changes in activity level and outcomes for patients with ME/CFS. This study examined the relationship between energy envelope and changes in activity after nonpharmacological interventions in a sample of 44 adults with ME/CFS. Results showed that those who were within their energy envelope before treatment showed more improvement in physical functioning and fatigue compared with those outside of their energy envelope. These findings suggest that an assessment of perceived available and expended energy could help guide the development of individualized nonpharmacological interventions for people with ME/CFS.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research on pediatric Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is reviewed in this article. Many recent articles in this area highlight the existence of key differences between the adult and pediatric forms of the illness. This review article provides an overview of pediatric ME/CFS, including epidemiology, diagnostic criteria, treatment, and prognosis. Challenges to the field are identified with the hope that in the future pediatric cases of ME/CFS can be more accurately diagnosed and successfully managed.
    01/2012; 3(4):257-270.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This demonstration presents the use of the Library Characterization Environment (LiChEn) for characterizing asynchronous standard cells. The tool was employed for the electrical characterization of a library with over five hundred asynchronous standard cells. In this work, a case study of a fundamental asynchronous component, the C-Element, will be presented to validate the use of the tool. LiChEn was designed due to the necessity of automating the process of characterizing asynchronous standard cells. Albeit this task can be done with tools from industrial EDA vendors, the use of these proved to require laborious manual work. These tools were designed for characterizing standard cells for synchronous systems and usually fail to recognize complex asynchronous logic. Moreover, asynchronous components are not available off the shelf in typical standard cell libraries, which constrains the asynchronous paradigm for full-custom approaches. As asynchronous techniques gain relevance in the research community, LiChEn can present a practical solution for a wider adoption of such techniques, by allowing an automated characterization of asynchronous standard cells.
    Electronics, Circuits and Systems (ICECS), 2012 19th IEEE International Conference on; 01/2012
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), the lack of consensus on how recovery should be defined or interpreted has generated controversy and confusion. The purpose of this paper was to systematically review, compare, and evaluate the definitions of recovery reported in the CFS literature and to make recommendations about the scope of recovery assessments. A search was done using the MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases for peer review papers that contained the search terms "chronic fatigue syndrome" and "recovery," "reversal," "remission," and/or "treatment response." From the 22 extracted studies, recovery was operationally defined by reference with one or more of these domains: (1) pre-morbid functioning; (2) both fatigue and function; (3) fatigue (or related symptoms) alone; (4) function alone; and/or (5) brief global assessment. Almost all of the studies measuring recovery in CFS did so differently. The brief global assessment was the most common outcome measure used to define recovery. Estimates of recovery ranged from 0 to 66 % in intervention studies and 2.6 to 62 % in naturalistic studies. Given that the term "recovery" was often based on limited assessments and less than full restoration of health, other more precise and accurate labels (e.g., clinically significant improvement) may be more appropriate and informative. In keeping with common understandings of the term recovery, we recommend a consistent definition that captures a broad-based return to health with assessments of both fatigue and function as well as the patient's perceptions of his/her recovery status.
    Quality of Life Research 05/2014; 23(9). DOI:10.1007/s11136-014-0705-9 · 2.86 Impact Factor


Available from
Jun 6, 2014