Article

Physician Division of Labor and Patient Selection for Outpatient Procedures

Health Care Management, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6218, USA.
Journal of Health Economics (Impact Factor: 2.25). 12/2010; 30(2):381-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.11.007
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Little is known about the ability of incentives to influence decisions by physicians regarding choices of settings for care delivery. In the context of outpatient procedural care, the emergence of freestanding ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) as alternatives to hospital-based outpatient departments (HOPDs) creates a unique opportunity to study this question. We advance a model where physicians' division of labor between ASCs and HOPDs affects the medical complexity of patients treated in low-acuity settings (i.e. ASCs). Analyses of outpatient surgical procedure data show that physicians working exclusively in low-acuity settings (i.e. ASCs) treat patients of significantly higher medical complexity in these settings than do physicians who also practice in higher-acuity settings (i.e. HOPDs). This discrepancy shrinks with increasing procedural risk and with increasing distance between ASCs and acute care hospitals.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Mark D Neuman, Jul 11, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
96 Views
 · 
15 Downloads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study is to estimate structural elements of patients' demand functions for healthcare facilities, particularly hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), towards the goal of answering questions about welfare gains earned from the introduction of ASCs. Spatial variation across patients and facilities, among other variables, is used for identification. Using data that contain the universe of outpatient surgeries in Florida from 1998 through 2004, I estimate by reduced‐form quantile regressions of facilities' actual demand curves as functions of travel‐cost between patient and facility. I show that there is a strong spatial component to demand. Then, developing a discrete choice model of demand for healthcare facilities, I estimate structural parameters from patients' demand functions from multinomial logit and mixed logit (random coefficient) specifications. Time‐to‐travel is found to be a significant factor in patients' choice of healthcare facility. I construct a cross‐time substitution matrix to explain how patients substitute between facilities when facilities change their location. Finally, I measure how patient welfare would change if a subset of facilities (ASCs) were removed from patients' choice sets. All of this is done without explicitly including a price variable, but instead using facility fixed effects that absorb price and quality, among other unobserved product characteristics.
    Journal of Industrial Economics 06/2010; 62(4). DOI:10.1111/joie.12063 · 1.04 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper investigates physician financial interests in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) using novel, longitudinal data that identify board members (directors) of ASCs in Florida. Improving on prior research, the estimated models in this paper disentangle physician director selection effects from the causal impact of these financial interests. The data suggest that even prior to their financial interest, physician directors had larger procedure volumes than non-directors. Physician directors also referred more lower-risk patients. On average, ASC board membership led to a 27% increase in a physician's procedure volume and a 16% increase in a physician's colonoscopy volume. Simulations suggest that 5% of the colonoscopies performed in Florida between 1997 and 2004 may have been due to physician ASC board membership. The evidence also suggests that physician directors steered patients from hospitals to their affiliate ASCs. In addition, they referred and/or treated more lower-risk patients as a result of board membership.
    Journal of Health Economics 07/2011; 30(5):904-18. DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.07.012 · 2.25 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The health care system in the United States has been criticized for skyrocketing expenditures and quality deficits. Simultaneously, health care providers and systems are under pressure to provide better and more proficient care. The landscape of the US health care system is shaped by federal and private payers which continue to develop initiatives designed to curtail costs. These include value-based reimbursement programs; cost-shifting expenses to the consumer and reducing reimbursement of providers and facilities. Moreover, there is an underlying thought to steer provision of health care to theoretically more efficient settings. Many of these initiatives are based on affordable health care reform. The major aspects of curtailing health care costs include hospital and other facility payments as well as physician payments and reductions in the approved services. Consequently, ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) are not immune to these changes. Until 1970, all surgery was performed in hospitals. The development of ASCs and site of service differential payments for in-office procedures have changed the dynamics of surgical trends with outpatient surgeries outpacing inpatient surgeries by as early as 1989. By 2008, approximately 65% of procedures were performed in all outpatient settings including hospital outpatient departments. ASCs claim that improved efficiency in health care delivery allows patients to spend less time in the health care setting with quicker turn over, improving the productivity of the health care team. However, since the majority of the ASCs are owned, in part, by the physicians who staff them, the financial incentives related to ownership have been alleged to potentially alter provider behavior. The number of Medicare certified ASCs and total Medicare payments from 1999 to 2010 increased significantly, but more recent year-to-year changes are far less substantial when compared to previous years. Net percent revenue growth from 2008 to 2009 was 3.2% and from 2009 to 2010 was 6.2% with an overall increase from 1999 of 183% over a period of 11 years. Similarly, the number of Medicare certified ASCs increased from 2,786 in 1999 to 5,316 in 2010, 1.1% increased from 2009 to 2010, however, a 91% increase from 1999 over a period of 11 years. Interventional pain management is one of the fastest growing specialties with a footprint in multiple disciplines. Interventional pain management in ASC settings has come a long way since June 1998 proposed Health Care Financing Administration's ASC rule which seriously compromised interventional pain management in the ASC setting. There are many payment challenges facing interventional pain management (IPM) in 2012. Significant changes continue to occur in the payment systems with policies of paying a certain percent of hospital outpatient department payments to ASCs which declined from 63% in 2008 to 56% in 2011, with substantial reductions for add-on codes. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) evaluation of IPM codes also consists of multiple misvalued codes. In conclusion, overall the future of ASCs may appear optimistic, but in the near perspective, specifically in 2012 to 2014, there will be challenging times specifically for interventional pain management centers with the regulatory environment and rapid changes taking place with or without implementation of Affordable Care Act.
    Pain physician 03/2012; 15(2):109-30. · 4.77 Impact Factor
Show more