Associations of blood lead with estimated glomerular filtration rate using MDRD, CKD-EPI and serum cystatin C-based equations

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation (Impact Factor: 3.58). 09/2011; 26(9):2786-92. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfq773
Source: PubMed


Low-level lead exposure is widespread and has been implicated as a chronic kidney disease (CKD) risk factor. However, studies evaluating associations of lead dose with newer, potentially more accurate, estimates of kidney function, in participants with a wide range of glomerular filtration rates (GFRs), are scarce.
We compared associations of blood lead and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and cystatin C single variable, multivariable and combined creatinine/cystatin C equations in 3941 adults who participated in the 1999-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cystatin C subsample.
Geometric mean blood lead was 1.7 μg/dL. After multivariable adjustment, differences [95% confidence interval (CI)] in mean eGFR for a doubling of blood lead were -1.9 (-3.2, -0.7), -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5) and -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5) mL/min/1.73 m(2), using the cystatin C single variable, multivariable and combined creatinine/cystatin C equations, respectively, reflecting lower eGFR with increased blood lead. The corresponding differences (95% CI) were -0.9 (-1.9, 0.02) and -0.9 (-1.8, 0.01) using the creatinine-based MDRD and CKD-EPI equations, respectively. In participants aged ≥60 years, differences in mean eGFR ranged from -3.0 to -4.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2), and odds of reduced eGFR (<60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) were increased for all estimates of GFR.
These results support the inclusion of cystatin C-based eGFR in future lead research and provide additional evidence for environmental lead exposure as a CKD risk factor.

Download full-text


Available from: Bernard G Jaar, Oct 04, 2015
1 Follower
34 Reads
  • Source
    • "However, data in children are scarce and less consistent than in adults (de Burbure et al. 2006; Fadrowski et al. 2010; Moel and Sachs 1992; Staessen et al. 2001). Furthermore, most studies of the association between lead and CKD evaluated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using estimating equations based on serum creatinine or cystatin C (Spector et al. 2011). These equations have limited precision and accuracy compared with formal measurement of GFR (Fadrowski et al. 2011; Poggio et al. 2005; Rule et al. 2004; Schwartz et al. 2009; Staples et al. 2010; Stevens et al. 2007), and lack of formal measurement of GFR is commonly listed as a limitation in studies examining the impact of lead on the kidney. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: The role of environmental exposure to lead as a risk factor for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and its progression remains controversial, and most studies have been limited by a lack of direct glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurement. Objective: We evaluated the association between lead exposure and GFR in children with CKD. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we examined the association between blood lead levels (BLLs) and GFR measured by the plasma disappearance of iohexol among 391 participants in the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) prospective cohort study. Results: Median BLL and GFR were 1.2 µg/dL and 44.4 mL/min per 1.73 m2, respectively. The average percent change in GFR for each 1-µg/dL increase in BLL was –2.1 (95% CI: –6.0, 1.8). In analyses stratified by CKD diagnosis, the association between BLL and GFR was stronger among children with glomerular disease underlying CKD; in this group, each 1-µg/dL increase in BLL was associated with a –12.1 (95% CI: –22.2, –1.9) percent change in GFR. In analyses stratified by anemia status, each 1-µg/dL increase in BLL among those with and without anemia was associated with a –0.3 (95% CI: –7.2, 6.6) and –4.6 (95% CI: –8.9, –0.3) percent change in GFR, respectively. Conclusions: There was no significant association between BLL and directly measured GFR in this relatively large cohort of children with CKD, although associations were observed in some subgroups. Longitudinal analyses are needed to examine the temporal relationship between lead and GFR decline, and to further examine the impact of underlying cause of CKD and anemia/hemoglobin status among patients with CKD.
    Environmental Health Perspectives 05/2013; 121(8). DOI:10.1289/ehp.1205164 · 7.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: After parents raised concerns about potential lead (Pb) contamination of calcium carbonate for treatment of hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD), we measured blood Pb using high-resolution sector field inductively coupled mass spectrometry in a quality-assurance investigation of ten pediatric dialysis patients (nine on hemodialysis) and six patients before dialysis. We assessed the kidney function as cystatin C estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), blood Pb levels, calcium carbonate dose, and standard laboratory parameters, as well as Pb levels in the dialysis feed water. Mean blood Pb concentration in the 16 pediatric CKD patients was 21.1 ± 15.8 µg/l with a maximum of 58 µg/l, which was significantly higher than that of 467 apparently healthy controls (median 6.35 µg/l, interquartile range 4.47, 8.71) and comparable to that of ten adult peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Lead levels correlated with red blood cell distribution width, eGFR, and calcium carbonate dose. Pb in dialysate feed water was always <0.00018 mg/l, which is below the accepted limit for water for dialysis of 0.005 mg/l. We found a high prevalence of elevated Pb levels in pediatric CKD patients that correlated with the calcium carbonate dose and GFR. Lead levels should be monitored in these patients.
    Pediatric Nephrology 04/2012; 27(9):1551-6. DOI:10.1007/s00467-012-2150-8 · 2.86 Impact Factor
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 05/2012; 28(8). DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfs036 · 3.58 Impact Factor
Show more