Article

Post-transcriptional control of circadian rhythms

Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, NB4.204G, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Journal of Cell Science (Impact Factor: 5.33). 02/2011; 124(Pt 3):311-20. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.065771
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Circadian rhythms exist in most living organisms. The general molecular mechanisms that are used to generate 24-hour rhythms are conserved among organisms, although the details vary. These core clocks consist of multiple regulatory feedback loops, and must be coordinated and orchestrated appropriately for the fine-tuning of the 24-hour period. Many levels of regulation are important for the proper functioning of the circadian clock, including transcriptional, post-transcriptional and post-translational mechanisms. In recent years, new information about post-transcriptional regulation in the circadian system has been discovered. Such regulation has been shown to alter the phase and amplitude of rhythmic mRNA and protein expression in many organisms. Therefore, this Commentary will provide an overview of current knowledge of post-transcriptional regulation of the clock genes and clock-controlled genes in dinoflagellates, plants, fungi and animals. This article will also highlight how circadian gene expression is modulated by post-transcriptional mechanisms and how this is crucial for robust circadian rhythmicity.

1 Follower
 · 
178 Views
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: eLife digest Many aspects of our physiology and behavior, most notably our patterns of sleep and wakefulness, are synchronized with the day–night cycle. These circadian rhythms are generated and maintained by the circadian clock, which consists of positive and negative feedback loops formed by a large number of genes and proteins. The end result is that the rates at which thousands of proteins are produced varies rhythmically over the course of the day–night cycle. It has long been suspected that one of the functions of this circadian clock is to control the timing of cell division. Moreover, since UV radiation can give rise to genetic mutations when cells divide, it is thought that the circadian clock limits the amount of DNA damage that occurs during daytime. Papp, Huber et al. have now confirmed that the circadian clock does indeed participate in the DNA damage response and have revealed that two proteins known to be involved in the circadian clock—Cryptochrome 1 and 2—have a central role in protecting the integrity of the genetic information in the cell. These proteins evolved from light-activated enzymes that repair DNA in bacteria. While mammalian cryptochromes have lost their ability to repair DNA, they still prefer to bind to genetic material that has been damaged by UV radiation. Papp, Huber et al. show that DNA damage triggers cryptochrome 1 to bind to a protein called Hausp, which stabilizes the cryptochrome and prevents it from being broken down. By contrast, DNA damage triggers cryptochrome 2 to bind to a protein called Fbxl3, which has a destabilizing effect on the cryptochrome and promotes its degradation. Since the cryptochromes regulate the activity of BMAL1 and CLOCK, the proteins associated with the two master clock genes, these changes can have a significant effect on the circadian clock of an organism. Further experiments are needed to work out how these proteins influence the activity of BMAL1 and CLOCK, and to investigate the seemingly conflicting roles of the two cryptochromes and the interactions between them. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04883.002
    eLife Sciences 03/2015; 4. DOI:10.7554/eLife.04883 · 8.52 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The transition from late gestation to early lactation is the most critical phase of the lactation cycle for mammals. Research in rodents has revealed changes in the clock circadian regulator (CLOCK) gene network expression around parturition. However, their expression profiles and putative functions during the periparturient period in ruminants remain to be determined. The present study aimed to investigate the expression pattern of the CLOCK network and selected metabolic genes simultaneously in mammary gland (MG), liver (LIV), and subcutaneous adipose tissue (AT). Seven dairy cows were biopsied at -10 (±2), 7, and 21 d relative to parturition. A day × tissue interaction was observed for ARNTL, CRY1, and PER2 due to upregulation at 7 and 21 d postpartum, with their expression being greater in AT and MG compared with LIV. No interaction was detected for CLOCK, CRY2, PER1, and PER3. In general, the expression of NPAS2, NR1D1, NR2F2, ALAS1, FECH, FBXW11, CCRN4L, PPARA, PPARGC1A, and FGF21 was lower at -10 d but increased postpartum in all tissues. The interaction detected for CSNK1D was associated with increased expression postpartum in AT and MG but not LIV. The interaction detected for CPT1A was due to upregulation in AT and LIV postpartum without a change in MG. In contrast, the interaction for PPARG was due to upregulation in AT and MG postpartum but a downregulation in LIV. Leptin was barely detectable in LIV, but there was an interaction effect in AT and MG associated with upregulation postpartum in MG and downregulation in AT. Together, these results suggest that the control of metabolic adaptations in LIV, MG, and AT around parturition might be partly regulated through the CLOCK gene network. Although the present study did not specifically address rhythmic control of tissue metabolism via the CLOCK gene network, the difference in expression of genes studied among tissues confirms that the behavior of circadian-controlled metabolic genes around parturition differs by tissue and, as such, is closely associated with the metabolic function of the organ. Copyright © 2015 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Journal of Dairy Science 04/2015; DOI:10.3168/jds.2015-9430 · 2.55 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
211 Downloads
Available from
May 20, 2014