Effect of primary care physicians' use of estimated glomerular filtration rate on the timing of their subspecialty referral decisions

Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
BMC Nephrology (Impact Factor: 1.52). 01/2011; 12:1. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-12-1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Primary care providers' suboptimal recognition of the severity of chronic kidney disease (CKD) may contribute to untimely referrals of patients with CKD to subspecialty care. It is unknown whether U.S. primary care physicians' use of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) rather than serum creatinine to estimate CKD severity could improve the timeliness of their subspecialty referral decisions.
We conducted a cross-sectional study of 154 United States primary care physicians to assess the effect of use of eGFR (versus creatinine) on the timing of their subspecialty referrals. Primary care physicians completed a questionnaire featuring questions regarding a hypothetical White or African American patient with progressing CKD. We asked primary care physicians to identify the serum creatinine and eGFR levels at which they would recommend patients like the hypothetical patient be referred for subspecialty evaluation. We assessed significant improvement in the timing [from eGFR < 30 to ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73m(2)) of their recommended referrals based on their use of creatinine versus eGFR.
Primary care physicians recommended subspecialty referrals later (CKD more advanced) when using creatinine versus eGFR to assess kidney function [median eGFR 32 versus 55 mL/min/1.73m(2), p < 0.001]. Forty percent of primary care physicians significantly improved the timing of their referrals when basing their recommendations on eGFR. Improved timing occurred more frequently among primary care physicians practicing in academic (versus non-academic) practices or presented with White (versus African American) hypothetical patients [adjusted percentage(95% CI): 70% (45-87) versus 37% (reference) and 57% (39-73) versus 25% (reference), respectively, both p ≤ 0.01).
Primary care physicians recommended subspecialty referrals earlier when using eGFR (versus creatinine) to assess kidney function. Enhanced use of eGFR by primary care physicians' could lead to more timely subspecialty care and improved clinical outcomes for patients with CKD.

Download full-text


Available from: Bernard G Jaar, Jul 13, 2015
  • Source
    • "The present recommendation is that GFR should be automatically reported using the CKD-EPI or MDRD equation whenever a creatinine measurement is ordered [1]. Primary care physicians recommended subspecialty referrals earlier when using eGFR versus creatinine for assessment of kidney function, thus improving clinical outcomes for patients with CKD [37] [38]. It is therefore of the utmost importance that available methods for measurement of creatinine be reliable, allowing correct identification of kidney disease. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper was to compare the agreement between creatinine measured by Jaffe and enzymatic methods and their putative influence on eGFR as calculated by the CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) equation in healthy and diabetic individuals. METHODS: Cross-sectional study conducted in 123 adult Southern Brazilians with GFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (53 with type 2 diabetes, 70 healthy volunteers). Mean age was 49±16 years (range 19-86). Most were female (55%) and white (83%). Creatinine was measured by a traceable Jaffe method (Modular P, Roche Diagnostic) and by an enzymatic method (CREA plus, Roche/Hitachi 917). GFR was measured by the (51)Cr-EDTA single-injection method. RESULTS: Serum creatinine measured by the Jaffe and enzymatic methods was similar in healthy subjects (0.79±0.15 vs. 0.79±0.15 mg/dL, respectively, P=0.76), and diabetic patients (0.96±0.22 vs. 0.92±0.29 mg/dL, respectively, P=0.17). However, the correlation between the two methods was higher in the healthy group (r=0.90 vs. 0.76, P<0.001). The difference between Jaffe creatinine and enzymatic creatinine was <10% in 63% of cases in the healthy group and 40% of cases in the diabetes group (P=0.018). In the subset of patients with diabetes, eGFR based on enzymatic assay results showed better agreement with measured GFR than did eGFR based on Jaffe results. CONCLUSION: Jaffe and enzymatic creatinine methods show adequate agreement in healthy subjects, but in the presence of diabetes, the enzymatic method performed slightly better.
    Clinical biochemistry 06/2013; 46(15). DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.05.067 · 2.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: outcomes and provide some insight into PCP management of CKD. Using the Cardiovascular Health Study, Dalrymple and colleagues compare the overall risk and risk factors of ESRD, cardiovascular death, and non-cardiovascular death among older (mean age of 75 years) community-dwelling adults with moderate CKD [median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 53 ml/min/1.73 m²]. They corroborate previous evidence that risk of death is much more likely than progression to ESRD in older adults 21 and highlight risk factors associated with all-cause mortality. Modifiable risk factors include body mass index
    Journal of General Internal Medicine 02/2011; 26(4):356-8. DOI:10.1007/s11606-011-1650-8 · 3.42 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An estimated 11% to 25% of adults in the United States have chronic kidney disease (CKD). In 2002, the National Kidney Foundation published a 5-stage classification of CKD based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) intending to improve identification and management of prevalent cases (National Kidney Foundation, Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39:S1-266). Nephrologists anticipated that the reporting of estimated GFR would improve early detection of CKD. The authors hypothesized that automatic eGFR reporting in our institution would subsequently result in increased new nephrology outpatient referrals at an earlier stage of CKD. The authors found that the proportion of referrals identifying earlier stages of CKD (eGFR greater than 45 mL/min) increased significantly for 2 years following the institution of eGFR reporting but was not sustained (P = 0.018); this trend was most obvious in African American women. No significant trend was seen with respect to age. The authors discuss potential reasons for automated eGFR reporting not leading to a sustained increase in nephrology referrals.
    The American Journal of the Medical Sciences 09/2011; 342(3):218-20. DOI:10.1097/MAJ.0b013e318225440e · 1.52 Impact Factor
Show more