Article

From Politics to Parity: Using a Health Disparities Index to Guide Legislative Efforts for Health Equity

Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
American Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 4.23). 03/2011; 101(3):554-60. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.171157
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We created an index quantifying the longitudinal burden of racial health disparities by state and compared this index to variables to guide the construction of, and validate support for, legislative efforts aimed at eliminating health disparities.
We evaluated 5 focus areas of greatest racial disparities in health from 1999 to 2005 and compiled state health disparities index (HDI) scores. We compared these scores with variables representing the purported social determinants of health.
Massachusetts (0.35), Oklahoma (0.35), and Washington (0.39) averaged the fewest disparities. Michigan (1.22), Wisconsin (1.32), and Illinois (1.50) averaged the greatest disparities. The statistical reference point for nationwide average racial disparities was 1.00. The longitudinal mixed model procedure yielded statistically significant correlations between HDI scores and Black state population percentage as well as with the racial gap in uninsured percentages. We noted a trend for HDI correlations with median household income ratios.
On the basis of the HDI-established trends in the extent and distribution of racial health disparities, and their correlated social determinants of health, policymakers should consider incorporating this tool to advise future efforts in minority health legislation.

0 Followers
 · 
89 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Appendiceal perforation (AP) is a marker of health care disparities. We propose that racial disparities in children, as measured by AP, may change according to the type of hospital in which a child receives care. STUDY DESIGN: Children 2 to 18 years old, with appendicitis diagnosed from 1999 to 2007, were retrospectively reviewed from the California Patient Discharge Dataset and sorted by community, children's, and county hospitals. Risk of AP within and between hospital types was analyzed with multivariate logistic regression controlling for hospital and patient level factors. RESULTS: Overall, 107,727 children (white, 36%; Hispanic, 53%; black, 3%; Asian, 5%; other, 8%) were treated at 386 California hospitals (community, 74%; children's, 17%; county, 10%). Hispanic (odds ratio [OR] 1.23, 99% CI 1.16 to 1.32) and Asian (OR 1.34, 99% CI 1.19 to 1.52) children treated at community hospitals experienced increased risk of AP compared with white children. Hispanic children cared for at children's hospitals also exhibited increased odds of AP (OR 1.18, 99% CI 1.05 to 1.33). Odds of AP did not differ by race within county hospitals. When comparing AP risk between hospital types, black children treated at county (OR 1.12, 99% CI 0.90 to 1.38) and children's (OR 2.01, 99% CI 1.18 to 3.42) hospitals exhibited increased odds of AP compared with black children treated at community hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: These results underscore differential patterns of AP at the hospital level and deserve immediate attention because they may reflect far larger disparities in access and quality of care for children in California. Future interventions aimed at eliminating racial disparities in children must account for racial differences in access to timely diagnostic and surgical intervention for rapidly progressive and preventable clinical conditions such as AP.
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons 11/2012; 216(1). DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.018 · 4.45 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study sought to explore the relationship(s) between U.S. states of selected social determinants of health (SDH) and three women's reproductive health outcomes including abortion, teen births, and infant mortality rates (IMR). The data from multiple population surveys were used to establish on a state-by-state basis, the interactions between selected SDH (religion, voting patterns, child poverty, and GINI) and their policy effects on three women's reproductive health outcomes (abortion, teen births, and IMRs) using publicly available national databases. Child poverty rates and the GINI coefficient were analyzed. Religiosity information was obtained from the Pew Forum's surveys. Voting results were collected from the 2008 congressional and presidential races and were used as proxy measures for conservative- versus liberal-leaning policies and policy makers. Using multiple regression analysis, higher IMRs were associated with higher religiosity scores. Lower abortion rates were associated with voting conservatively and higher income inequality. Higher teen birth rates were associated with higher child poverty rates and voting conservatively. This study shows that selected SDH may have substantial impacts on women's reproductive health outcomes at the state level. Significant inequalities exist between liberal and conservative states that affect women's health outcomes. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Public Health Nursing 04/2015; DOI:10.1111/phn.12196 · 0.89 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
0 Downloads
Available from