Article

Two-Dimensional Optical Control of Electron Spin Orientation by Linearly Polarized Light in InGaAs

II. Institute of Physics, RWTH Aachen University, Otto-Blumenthal-Straße, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Physical Review Letters (Impact Factor: 7.73). 12/2010; 105(24):246603. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.246603
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Optical absorption of circularly polarized light is well known to yield an electron spin polarization in direct band gap semiconductors. We demonstrate that electron spins can even be generated with high efficiency by absorption of linearly polarized light in InxGa(1-x)As. By changing the incident linear polarization direction we can selectively excite spins in both polar and transverse directions. These directions can be identified by the phase during spin precession using time-resolved Faraday rotation. We show that the spin orientations do not depend on the crystal axes suggesting an extrinsic excitation mechanism.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Klaus Schmalbuch, May 27, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
120 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Time-resolved magneto-optics is a well-established optical pump–probe technique to generate and to probe spin coherence in semiconductors. By this method, spin dephasing times can easily be determined if their values are comparable to the available pump–probe delays. If exceeds the laser repetition time, however, resonant spin amplification (RSA) can equally be used to extract . We demonstrate that in ZnO these techniques have several tripping hazards resulting in deceptive values for and show how to avoid them. We show that the temperature dependence of the amplitude ratio of two separate spin species can easily be misinterpreted as a strongly temperature-dependent of a single spin ensemble, while the two spin species have values, which are nearly independent of temperature. Additionally, consecutive pump pulses can significantly diminish the spin polarization, which remains from previous pump pulses. While this barely affects values extracted from delay line scans, it results in seemingly shorter values in RSA.
    physica status solidi (b) 09/2014; 251(9). DOI:10.1002/pssb.201350201 · 1.61 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We demonstrate all-electrical spin generation and subsequent manipulation by two successive electric field pulses in an n-InGaAs heterostructure in a time-resolved experiment at zero external magnetic field. The first electric field pulse along the $[1\bar10]$ crystal axis creates a current induced spin polarization (CISP) which is oriented in the plane of the sample. The subsequent electric field pulse along [110] generates a perpendicular magnetic field pulse leading to a coherent precession of this spin polarization with 2-dimensional electrical control over the final spin orientation. Spin precession is probed by time-resolved Faraday rotation. We determine the build-up time of CISP during the first field pulse and extract the spin dephasing time and internal magnetic field strength during the spin manipulation pulse.
    Applied Physics Letters 12/2013; 104(6). DOI:10.1063/1.4864468 · 3.52 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The electrical and optical spin control methods were combined and implemented in a two- dimensional electron gas. We show that the electron spin polarization generated by an electrical current may have its direction controlled and magnitude amplified by periodic optical excitation. The resulting spin dynamics in an external transverse magnetic field was optically probed using Kerr rotation. We found long spin lifetime for a large range of applied voltage, and strong dependence on the pulse optical power and sample temperature. The signal was mapped in a Hall bar as function of the position relative to the injection contact. Finally, the in-plane current-induced spin polarization was directly measured by rotating the external magnetic field and the internal magnetic field role was analyzed.
    Physical Review B 03/2014; 90(4). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.90.041302 · 3.66 Impact Factor