Phase I study of continuous MKC-1 in patients with advanced or metastatic solid malignancies using the modified Time-to-Event Continual Reassessment Method (TITE-CRM) dose escalation design.

University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA.
Investigational New Drugs (Impact Factor: 2.93). 06/2011; 30(3):1039-45. DOI: 10.1007/s10637-010-9629-6
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT MKC-1 is an oral cell-cycle inhibitor with broad antitumor activity in preclinical models. Clinical studies demonstrated modest antitumor activity using intermittent dosing schedule, however additional preclinical data suggested continuous dosing could be efficacious with additional effects against the mTor/AKT pathway. The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and response of continuous MKC-1. Secondary objectives included characterizing the dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) and pharmacokinetics (PK).
Patients with solid malignancies were eligible, if they had measurable disease, ECOG PS ≤1, and adequate organ function. Exclusions included brain metastases and inability to receive oral drug. MKC-1 was dosed twice daily, continuously in 28-day cycles. Other medications were eliminated if there were possible drug interactions. Doses were assigned using a TITE-CRM algorithm following enrollment of the first 3 pts. Disease response was assessed every 8 weeks.
Between 5/08-9/09, 24 patients enrolled (15 M/9 F, median 58 years, range 44-77). Patients 1-3 received 120 mg/d of MKC-1; patients 4-24 were dosed per the TITE-CRM algorithm: 150 mg [n = 1], 180 [2], 200 [1], 230 [1], 260 [5], 290 [6], 320 [5]. The median time on drug was 8 weeks (range 4-28). The only DLT occurred at 320 mg (grade 3 fatigue). Stable disease occurred at 150 mg/d (28 weeks; RCC) and 320 mg/d (16 weeks; breast, parotid). Escalation halted at 320 mg/d. Day 28 pharmacokinetics indicated absorption and active metabolites.
Continuous MKC-1 was well-tolerated; there were no RECIST responses, although clinical benefit occurred in 3/24 pts. Dose escalation stopped at 320 mg/d, and this is the MTD as defined by the CRM dose escalation algorithm; this cumulative dose/cycle exceeds that determined from intermittent dosing studies. A TITE-CRM allowed for rapid dose escalation and was able to account for late toxicities with continuous dosing via a modified algorithm.


Available from: Glenn Liu, Apr 20, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of early stage clinical trials is to determine the recommended dose and toxicity profile of an investigational agent or multi-drug combination. Molecularly targeted agents (MTAs) and immunotherapies have distinct toxicities from chemotherapies that are often not dose dependent and can lead to chronic and sometimes unpredictable side effects. Therefore utilizing a dose escalation method that has toxicity based endpoints may not be as appropriate for determination of recommended dose, and alternative parameters such as pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic outcomes are potentially appealing options. Approaches to enhance safety and optimize dosing include improved preclinical models and assessment, innovative model based design and dose escalation strategies, patient selection, the use of expansion cohorts and extended toxicity assessments. Tailoring the design of phase I trials by adopting new strategies to address the different properties of MTAs is required to enhance the development of these agents. This review will focus on the limitations to safety and dose determination that have occurred in the development of MTAs and immunotherapies. In addition, strategies are proposed to overcome these challenges to develop phase I trials that can more accurately define the recommended dose and identify adverse events.
    Molecular Oncology 08/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.molonc.2014.07.025 · 5.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is a crucial mediator of tumor progression. As the PI3K/Akt pathway is heavily deregulated in breast cancer, the application of mTOR inhibitors in breast cancer patients seems warranted. This is the first systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines to synthesize all available data of mTOR inhibitors in all subcategories of breast cancer. The search strategy retrieved 16 studies evaluating everolimus (1492 patients), seven studies examining temsirolimus (1245 patients), one study evaluating sirolimus (400 patients) and two studies evaluating MKC-1 (60 patients). The Breast Cancer Trials of Oral Everolimus-2 (BOLERO-2) study has marked a turning point in the evaluation of everolimus in the treatment of estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Given the positive results, everolimus has entered NCCN 2012 guidelines, and its approval of its combination with exemestane by FDA and EMA is imminent. In addition, the promising antitumor activity and long-term disease control further suggest that mTOR inhibition with everolimus may provide an avenue for achieving long-lasting benefit from trastuzumab-based therapy in HER2-positive patients. Regarding temsirolimus, it seems that the agent may play, in the future, a role in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer; importantly, however, there is an unmet need to find its optimal target subpopulation.
    Gynecologic Oncology 12/2012; 127(3):662–672. DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.08.040 · 3.69 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose We provide a comprehensive review of adaptive phase I clinical trials in oncology that used a statistical model to guide dose escalation to identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). We describe the clinical setting, practical implications, and safety of such applications, with the aim of understanding how these designs work in practice. Methods We identified 53 phase I trials published between January 2003 and September 2013 that used the continual reassessment method (CRM), CRM using escalation with overdose control, or time-to-event CRM for late-onset toxicities. Study characteristics, design parameters, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) definition, DLT rate, patient-dose allocation, overdose, underdose, sample size, and trial duration were abstracted from each study. In addition, we examined all studies in terms of safety, and we outlined the reasons why escalations occur and under what circumstances. Results On average, trials accrued 25 to 35 patients over a 2-year period and tested five dose levels. The average DLT rate was 18%, which is lower than in previous reports, whereas all levels above the MTD had an average DLT rate of 36%. On average, 39% of patients were treated at the MTD, and 74% were treated at either the MTD or an adjacent level (one level above or below). Conclusion This review of completed phase I studies confirms the safety and generalizability of model-guided, adaptive dose-escalation designs, and it provides an approach for using, interpreting, and understanding such designs to guide dose escalation in phase I trials. (C) 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
    Journal of Clinical Oncology 06/2014; 32(23). DOI:10.1200/JCO.2013.54.6051 · 17.88 Impact Factor