Article

Patient Satisfaction After Surgical Correction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY, USA.
Spine (Impact Factor: 2.45). 05/2011; 36(12):965-8. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e92b1d
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Longitudinal cohort.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between change in SRS-22 domain scores and satisfaction with management in patients who underwent surgical correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
The Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) is a widely used instrument to measure clinical outcomes in patients with scoliosis. The relationship between patient satisfaction and changes in domain scores in the SRS-22 has not been previously reported.
This is a longitudinal cohort of 745 patients with AIS who underwent surgical correction and had completed SRS-22 preoperative and 2 years postoperative. Patients who had a previous spine surgery were excluded. Wilcoxon tests were used to compare preop and 2-year postop scores. Spearman correlations were used to evaluate associations between change in SRS-22 domain scores from preoperative to 2 years postoperative and the 2-year SRS Satisfaction score.
There were 622 females and 123 males with a mean age of 14.2 years and a mean Cobb angle of 54°. There was a statistically significant difference between paired preoperative and 2-year postoperative SRS domain scores. Spearman correlations between the change in SRS domain scores and the SRS Satisfaction score at 2 years postoperative were statistically significant but were low to moderate: Appearance = 0.284, Activity = 0.172, Pain = 0.260, Mental = 0.202, and Total = 0.398.
Although there is a statistically significant change in all the SRS domain scores from preoperative to 2 years postsurgical correction of AIS, there was low to moderate associations between the change in any of the domain scores and patient satisfaction with treatment. This may be attributable to the prominent ceiling effect in the Satisfaction domain, or the lack of responsiveness of the SRS-22 to measure clinically relevant changes in activity, pain and mental health 2 years after correction of scoliosis in the adolescent population.

1 Bookmark
 · 
85 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Study Design. Prospective, nonrandomized study of children with congenital scoliosis.Objective. To determine the outcomes of children with congenital scoliosis using SRS-22.Summary of Background Data. Outcome measures in children with congenital scoliosis are unreported. Novel treatments such as the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) must show positive patient-reported outcomes during treatment as improvement in pulmonary function has not been demonstrated.Methods. Patients with congenital scoliosis were prospectively enrolled and divided into three groups: children under observation (OBSERVATION), children who had surgery (SURGICAL), and children treated with VEPTR (VEPTR). The SRS-22 reports six domains: Total, Function, Mental Health, Image, Satisfaction, and Pain. SRS-22 questionnaires were prospectively collected from 184 OBSERVATION patients, 27 SURGICAL patients, and 22 VEPTR patients. Due to repeated measurement on each patient, the observations cannot be assumed to be independent. To account for this dependence, linear mixed models were used.Results. OBSERVATION scores were near normal in all domains. Initial postoperative scores for Function and Pain decreased for the SURGICAL group and subsequently Total, Function Image, and Satisfaction scores increased. Initial postoperative VEPTR scores in Mental Health and Pain decreased and Total, Function, and Image scores increased over subsequent visits.Conclusions. Children with Congenital Scoliosis had SRS-22 scores that compare favorably to scores in the literature for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. For SURGICAL and VEPTR patients with congenital scoliosis SRS-22 Total, Function, and Image scores increased over time. Function, Image, and Pain require focus in children with congenital scoliosis. This is the first study which documents improvement in outcomes of VEPTR patients while in treatment.
    Spine 08/2014; 39(22). DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000546 · 2.45 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction and aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) to determine whether a low body mass index (BMI) influences surgery outcomes and satisfaction. Methods There were 39 patients in this prospective 3-year cohort study. The BMI, Cobb angle, the Body Shape Questionnaire 14 (BSQ-14), the Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire 22 (SRS-22) and eight satisfaction questions results were obtained. Having a BMI greater than or less than 18 kg/m2 was used as a determiner to allocate patients to groups. As a low BMI is related to the presence of a disturbance in body perception, patients were also dichotomized by using the BSQ-14. Results All scales were worse in both slimmer patients and the group with a body perception disorder. The group with a BMI 2 obtained a total of 82.31 points in the SRS-22, and it was 93.45 points for the group with a BMI >18 kg/m2 (p = 0.001). In terms of satisfaction, the percentage of patients that would undergo surgery again was 30.8 vs 69.2 % (p = 0.054). Patients with an alteration of physical perception obtained a total SRS-22 of 82.90 points versus 96.10 points in the control group (p p = 0.29) or the percentage of correction (p = 0.841) were found in any case. Conclusion The alteration of physical perception and a low BMI negatively affect the outcomes in AIS surgery, regardless of the curve magnitude and the percentage of correction. Considerable care should be taken in recommending surgical correction to these patients.
    European Spine Journal 07/2014; 24(2). DOI:10.1007/s00586-014-3486-5 · 2.47 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To learn about the experiences of adolescents diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis.
    Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P 08/2014; 48(4):748-57. DOI:10.1590/S0080-623420140000400024 · 0.50 Impact Factor