Article

Structure and function of YghU, a nu-class glutathione transferase related to YfcG from Escherichia coli.

Department of Biochemistry, Center in Molecular Toxicology, and Vanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-0146, United States.
Biochemistry (Impact Factor: 3.38). 02/2011; 50(7):1274-81. DOI: 10.1021/bi101861a
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The crystal structure (1.50 Å resolution) and biochemical properties of the GSH transferase homologue, YghU, from Escherichia coli reveal that the protein is unusual in that it binds two molecules of GSH in each active site. The crystallographic observation is consistent with biphasic equilibrium binding data that indicate one tight (K(d1) = 0.07 ± 0.03 mM) and one weak (K(d2) = 1.3 ± 0.2 mM) binding site for GSH. YghU exhibits little or no GSH transferase activity with most typical electrophilic substrates but does possess a modest catalytic activity toward several organic hydroperoxides. Most notably, the enzyme also exhibits disulfide-bond reductase activity toward 2-hydroxyethyl disulfide [k(cat) = 74 ± 6 s(-1), and k(cat)/K(M)(GSH) = (6.6 ± 1.3) × 10(4) M(-1) s(-1)] that is comparable to that previously determined for YfcG. A superposition of the structures of the YghU·2GSH and YfcG·GSSG complexes reveals a remarkable structural similarity of the active sites and the 2GSH and GSSG molecules in each. We conclude that the two structures represent reduced and oxidized forms of GSH-dependent disulfide-bond oxidoreductases that are distantly related to glutaredoxin 2. The structures and properties of YghU and YfcG indicate that they are members of the same, but previously unidentified, subfamily of GSH transferase homologues, which we suggest be called the nu-class GSH transferases.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
85 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The cytosolic glutathione transferase (cytGST) superfamily comprises more than 13,000 nonredundant sequences found throughout the biosphere. Their key roles in metabolism and defense against oxidative damage have led to thousands of studies over several decades. Despite this attention, little is known about the physiological reactions they catalyze and most of the substrates used to assay cytGSTs are synthetic compounds. A deeper understanding of relationships across the superfamily could provide new clues about their functions. To establish a foundation for expanded classification of cytGSTs, we generated similarity-based subgroupings for the entire superfamily. Using the resulting sequence similarity networks, we chose targets that broadly covered unknown functions and report here experimental results confirming GST-like activity for 82 of them, along with 37 new 3D structures determined for 27 targets. These new data, along with experimentally known GST reactions and structures reported in the literature, were painted onto the networks to generate a global view of their sequence-structure-function relationships. The results show how proteins of both known and unknown function relate to each other across the entire superfamily and reveal that the great majority of cytGSTs have not been experimentally characterized or annotated by canonical class. A mapping of taxonomic classes across the superfamily indicates that many taxa are represented in each subgroup and highlights challenges for classification of superfamily sequences into functionally relevant classes. Experimental determination of disulfide bond reductase activity in many diverse subgroups illustrate a theme common for many reaction types. Finally, sequence comparison between an enzyme that catalyzes a reductive dechlorination reaction relevant to bioremediation efforts with some of its closest homologs reveals differences among them likely to be associated with evolution of this unusual reaction. Interactive versions of the networks, associated with functional and other types of information, can be downloaded from the Structure-Function Linkage Database (SFLD; http://sfld.rbvi.ucsf.edu).
    PLoS Biology 04/2014; 12(4):e1001843. DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001843 · 11.77 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Glutathione transferases (GSTs) are known to transfer glutathione onto small hydrophobic molecules in detoxification reactions. The GST Ure2pB1 from Phanerochaete chrysosporium exhibits atypical features, ie the presence of two glutathione binding sites and a high affinity towards oxidized glutathione. Moreover, PcUre2pB1 is able to efficiently deglutathionylate GS-phenacylacetophenone. Catalysis is not mediated by the cysteines of the protein but rather by the one of glutathione and an asparagine residue plays a key role in glutathione stabilization. Interestingly PcUre2pB1 interacts in vitro with a GST of the omega class. These properties are discussed in the physiological context of wood degrading fungi.
    FEBS letters 05/2013; 587(14). DOI:10.1016/j.febslet.2013.05.031 · 3.54 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Glutathione is a small peptide with a crucial role in living organisms. This molecule is found in Nature in both reduced (GSH) and oxidized (GSSG) forms and a high GSH/GSSG ratio is essential to the cell. Glutathione is also present in several enzymatic reactions and can be found in many protein structures. As small peptides, these molecules do not have a defined structure in solution being able to sample a broader conformational space. In addition, both molecules have several titration sites (four in GSH and six in GSSG) and their conformational space is inevitably influenced by pH. Here, we present a detailed conformational study of GSH and GSSG in a range of pH values, together with a full pH titration of these molecules. We performed constant-pH MD simulations of GSH and GSSG at 24 pH values in a total of 14.4 μs (300 ns per pH value). We obtained the two titration curves and the pKa values for all titrable groups with good agreement with experiments. We also observed that GSH and GSSG have a large conformational variability in solution and its structural preferences do not get significantly affected upon binding to proteins. Some exceptions were found and investigated in detail.
    The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 05/2013; 117(25). DOI:10.1021/jp401066v · 3.38 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
0 Downloads
Available from