SaniTwice: a novel approach to hand hygiene for reducing bacterial contamination on hands when soap and water are unavailable.

GOJO Industries, Inc., P.O. Box 991, Akron, Ohio 44309, USA.
Journal of food protection (Impact Factor: 1.8). 12/2010; 73(12):2296-300.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The risk of inadequate hand hygiene in food handling settings is exacerbated when water is limited or unavailable, thereby making washing with soap and water difficult. The SaniTwice method involves application of excess alcohol-based hand sanitizer (ABHS), hand "washing" for 15 s, and thorough cleaning with paper towels while hands are still wet, followed by a standard application of ABHS. This study investigated the effectiveness of the SaniTwice methodology as an alternative to hand washing for cleaning and removal of microorganisms. On hands moderately soiled with beef broth containing Escherichia coli (ATCC 11229), washing with a nonantimicrobial hand washing product achieved a 2.86 (±0.64)-log reduction in microbial contamination compared with the baseline, whereas the SaniTwice method with 62 % ethanol (EtOH) gel, 62 % EtOH foam, and 70 % EtOH advanced formula gel achieved reductions of 2.64 ± 0.89, 3.64 ± 0.57, and 4.61 ± 0.33 log units, respectively. When hands were heavily soiled from handling raw hamburger containing E. coli, washing with nonantimicrobial hand washing product and antimicrobial hand washing product achieved reductions of 2.65 ± 0.33 and 2.69 ± 0.32 log units, respectively, whereas SaniTwice with 62 % EtOH foam, 70 % EtOH gel, and 70 % EtOH advanced formula gel achieved reductions of 2.87 ± 0.42, 2.99 ± 0.51, and 3.92 ± 0.65 log units, respectively. These results clearly demonstrate that the in vivo antibacterial efficacy of the SaniTwice regimen with various ABHS is equivalent to or exceeds that of the standard hand washing approach as specified in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Food Code. Implementation of the SaniTwice regimen in food handling settings with limited water availability should significantly reduce the risk of foodborne infections resulting from inadequate hand hygiene.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The introduction of pathogens from the external environment into poultry houses by the boots of farm workers and visitors presents a significant risk. The use of boot dips containing disinfectant to help prevent this from happening is common practice, but the effectiveness of these boot dips as a preventive measure can vary. The aim of this study was to assess the anti-Salmonella activity of boot dips that are being used on poultry farms. Boot dip samples were collected from commercial laying hen farms in the United Kingdom and tested within 24 hours of receipt at the laboratory to assess their anti-Salmonella activity. All boot dip samples were tested against a field strain of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (SE) using three test models: pure culture, paper disc surface matrix and yeast suspension model. Of the 112 boot dip samples tested 83.6% were effective against Salmonella in pure culture, 37.3% in paper disc surface matrix and 44.5% in yeast suspension model. Numerous factors may influence the efficacy of the disinfectants. Disinfectants used in the dips may not always be fully active against surface or organic matter contamination, they may be inaccurately measured or diluted to a concentration other than that specified or recommended. Dips may not be changed regularly or may have been exposed to rain and other environmental elements. This study showed that boot dips that are in use on poultry farms are frequently ineffective.
    Avian Pathology 02/2015; 44(2):1-23. DOI:10.1080/03079457.2015.1012046 · 2.04 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Healthcare worker's (HCW) hands are the commonest vehicle for the transmission of microorganisms from patient to patient and within the healthcare environment. The aims of this study were to evaluate the impact of a multimodal campaign over the type and amount of resident and transient flora and the presence of potential risk factors for hand contamination during routine care. A before-after interventional study was made in medical wards from a tertiary care hospital. Eighty nine samples were analyzed. Samples were cultured immediately before patient contact using a glove-juice method. Data collected included socio-demographic and risk factors for hand contamination. Flora colony-forming units (CFU)/mL loads (log10) were evaluated by comparing median values in the PRE and POST periods. Transient flora was isolated in 67.4% and 46.1% HCW hands in the PRE and POST periods, respectively (p<0.001). Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas spp and MSSA were the predominant contaminants. Resident flora was isolated in 92.1% in pre and in 70.8% in post period (p<0.001); methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci log10 count decreased from 1.96 log10 (± 1.2) to 0.89 log10 (± 1.2) (p<0.001). Global flora CFU decreased from 2.77 log10 (± 1.1) to 1.56 log10 (± 1.4) (p<0.001). In the POST period a lower number of rings (p<0.001), shorter fingernail length (p=0.008), shorter time of recent hand hygiene (HH) (p=0.007), and a higher use of alcohol-based hand rub instead of soap (p<0.001) were documented. A HH multimodal strategy reduced the number of risk factors and the level of HCW hand contamination.
    Journal of Medical Microbiology 01/2013; 62(Pt_4). DOI:10.1099/jmm.0.050328-0 · 2.27 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Norovirus infections are notoriously difficult to prevent and control due to their low infectious dose, high shedding titer, and environmental stability. The virus can spread through multiple transmission routes of which person-to-person and foodborne are the most important. Recent advances in molecular diagnostics, have helped to establish norovirus as the most common cause of sporadic gastroenteritis and most common cause of outbreaks of acute gastroenteritis across all ages. In this paper, we review the epidemiology and virology of noroviruses as well as prevention and control guidelines with a focus on the principles of disinfection and decontamination; Outbreak management relies on sound infection control principles including hand hygiene, limiting exposure to infectious individuals, and thorough environmental decontamination. Ideally, all infection control recommendations would rely on empirical evidence, but a number of challenges, including the inability to culture norovirus in the laboratory and the challenges of outbreak management in complex environments, has made it difficult to garner clear evidence of efficacy in certain areas of infection control. New experimental data on cultivable surrogates for human norovirus on the environmental survivability and relative resistance to commonly used disinfectants, are providing new insights in further refining disinfection practices. Finally, clinical trials are underway to evaluate the efficacy of vaccines which may shift the current infection control principles to more targeted interventions.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Clinical Microbiology and Infection 05/2014; 20(8). DOI:10.1111/1469-0691.12674 · 5.20 Impact Factor

Preview (2 Sources)

1 Download
Available from