SaniTwice: A novel approach to hand hygiene for reducing bacterial contamination on hands when soap and water are unavailable

GOJO Industries, Inc., P.O. Box 991, Akron, Ohio 44309, USA.
Journal of food protection (Impact Factor: 1.85). 12/2010; 73(12):2296-300.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The risk of inadequate hand hygiene in food handling settings is exacerbated when water is limited or unavailable, thereby making washing with soap and water difficult. The SaniTwice method involves application of excess alcohol-based hand sanitizer (ABHS), hand "washing" for 15 s, and thorough cleaning with paper towels while hands are still wet, followed by a standard application of ABHS. This study investigated the effectiveness of the SaniTwice methodology as an alternative to hand washing for cleaning and removal of microorganisms. On hands moderately soiled with beef broth containing Escherichia coli (ATCC 11229), washing with a nonantimicrobial hand washing product achieved a 2.86 (±0.64)-log reduction in microbial contamination compared with the baseline, whereas the SaniTwice method with 62 % ethanol (EtOH) gel, 62 % EtOH foam, and 70 % EtOH advanced formula gel achieved reductions of 2.64 ± 0.89, 3.64 ± 0.57, and 4.61 ± 0.33 log units, respectively. When hands were heavily soiled from handling raw hamburger containing E. coli, washing with nonantimicrobial hand washing product and antimicrobial hand washing product achieved reductions of 2.65 ± 0.33 and 2.69 ± 0.32 log units, respectively, whereas SaniTwice with 62 % EtOH foam, 70 % EtOH gel, and 70 % EtOH advanced formula gel achieved reductions of 2.87 ± 0.42, 2.99 ± 0.51, and 3.92 ± 0.65 log units, respectively. These results clearly demonstrate that the in vivo antibacterial efficacy of the SaniTwice regimen with various ABHS is equivalent to or exceeds that of the standard hand washing approach as specified in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Food Code. Implementation of the SaniTwice regimen in food handling settings with limited water availability should significantly reduce the risk of foodborne infections resulting from inadequate hand hygiene.

13 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pathogenic strains of Escherichia coli and human norovirus are the main etiologic agents of foodborne illness resulting from inadequate hand hygiene practices by food service workers. This study was conducted to evaluate the antibacterial and antiviral efficacy of various hand hygiene product regimens under different soil conditions representative of those in food service settings and assess the impact of product formulation on this efficacy. On hands contaminated with chicken broth containing E. coli, representing a moderate soil load, a regimen combining an antimicrobial hand washing product with a 70% ethanol advanced formula (EtOH AF) gel achieved a 5.22-log reduction, whereas a nonantimicrobial hand washing product alone achieved a 3.10log reduction. When hands were heavily soiled from handling ground beef containing E. coli, a wash-sanitize regimen with a 0.5% chloroxylenol antimicrobial hand washing product and the 70% EtOH AF gel achieved a 4.60-log reduction, whereas a wash-sanitize regimen with a 62% EtOH foam achieved a 4.11-log reduction. Sanitizing with the 70% EtOH AF gel alone was more effective than hand washing with a nonantimicrobial product for reducing murine norovirus (MNV), a surrogate for human norovirus, with 2.60- and 1.79-log reductions, respectively. When combined with hand washing, the 70% EtOH AF gel produced a 3.19-log reduction against MNV. A regimen using the SaniTwice protocol with the 70% EtOH AF gel produced a 4.04-log reduction against MNV. These data suggest that although the process of hand washing helped to remove pathogens from the hands, use of a wash-sanitize regimen was even more effective for reducing organisms. Use of a high-efficacy sanitizer as part of a wash-sanitize regimen further increased the efficacy of the regimen. The use of a well-formulated alcohol-based hand rub as part of a wash-sanitize regimen should be considered as a means to reduce risk of infection transmission in food service facilities.
    Journal of food protection 07/2012; 75(7):1303-9. DOI:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-449 · 1.85 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Healthcare worker's (HCW) hands are the commonest vehicle for the transmission of microorganisms from patient to patient and within the healthcare environment. The aims of this study were to evaluate the impact of a multimodal campaign over the type and amount of resident and transient flora and the presence of potential risk factors for hand contamination during routine care. A before-after interventional study was made in medical wards from a tertiary care hospital. Eighty nine samples were analyzed. Samples were cultured immediately before patient contact using a glove-juice method. Data collected included socio-demographic and risk factors for hand contamination. Flora colony-forming units (CFU)/mL loads (log10) were evaluated by comparing median values in the PRE and POST periods. Transient flora was isolated in 67.4% and 46.1% HCW hands in the PRE and POST periods, respectively (p<0.001). Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas spp and MSSA were the predominant contaminants. Resident flora was isolated in 92.1% in pre and in 70.8% in post period (p<0.001); methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci log10 count decreased from 1.96 log10 (± 1.2) to 0.89 log10 (± 1.2) (p<0.001). Global flora CFU decreased from 2.77 log10 (± 1.1) to 1.56 log10 (± 1.4) (p<0.001). In the POST period a lower number of rings (p<0.001), shorter fingernail length (p=0.008), shorter time of recent hand hygiene (HH) (p=0.007), and a higher use of alcohol-based hand rub instead of soap (p<0.001) were documented. A HH multimodal strategy reduced the number of risk factors and the level of HCW hand contamination.
    Journal of Medical Microbiology 01/2013; 62(Pt_4). DOI:10.1099/jmm.0.050328-0 · 2.25 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Norovirus infections are notoriously difficult to prevent and control due to their low infectious dose, high shedding titer, and environmental stability. The virus can spread through multiple transmission routes of which person-to-person and foodborne are the most important. Recent advances in molecular diagnostics, have helped to establish norovirus as the most common cause of sporadic gastroenteritis and most common cause of outbreaks of acute gastroenteritis across all ages. In this paper, we review the epidemiology and virology of noroviruses as well as prevention and control guidelines with a focus on the principles of disinfection and decontamination; Outbreak management relies on sound infection control principles including hand hygiene, limiting exposure to infectious individuals, and thorough environmental decontamination. Ideally, all infection control recommendations would rely on empirical evidence, but a number of challenges, including the inability to culture norovirus in the laboratory and the challenges of outbreak management in complex environments, has made it difficult to garner clear evidence of efficacy in certain areas of infection control. New experimental data on cultivable surrogates for human norovirus on the environmental survivability and relative resistance to commonly used disinfectants, are providing new insights in further refining disinfection practices. Finally, clinical trials are underway to evaluate the efficacy of vaccines which may shift the current infection control principles to more targeted interventions.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Clinical Microbiology and Infection 05/2014; 20(8). DOI:10.1111/1469-0691.12674 · 5.77 Impact Factor
Show more

Preview (2 Sources)

13 Reads
Available from