Autism spectrum disorders in the DSM-V: better or worse than the DSM-IV?

The NAS Lorna Wing Centre for Autism, Elliot House, 113 Masons Hill, Bromley, Kent BR2 9HT, UK.
Research in developmental disabilities (Impact Factor: 4.41). 03/2011; 32(2):768-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.11.003
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The DSM-V-committee has recently published proposed diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorders. We examine these criteria in some detail. We believe that the DSM-committee has overlooked a number of important issues, including social imagination, diagnosis in infancy and adulthood, and the possibility that girls and women with autism may continue to go unrecognised or misdiagnosed under the new manual. We conclude that a number of changes need to be made in order that the DSM-V-criteria might be used reliably and validly in clinical practice and research.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this article, a variety of neuroimaging methods that have been applied to investigate autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) will be covered, and a review of the latest findings for each will be summarized. Studies that attempt to map identified brain anomalies in individuals with ASD are mapped onto the symptoms, traits, and severity of the disorder.
    Brain Mapping: An Encyclopedic Reference. V, Edited by Editor-in-Chief: Arthur W. Toga, 02/2015: chapter olume 3: Social Cognitive Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Brain Mapping.: pages Pages 1049–1060; Elsevier Inc.., ISBN: ISBN: 978-0-12-397316-0
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Autism Spectrum Disorder Observation for Children (ASD-OC) is a 45-item observation scale used to assess autistic symptomatology. The reliability of this measure has been established in previous research; therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate its validity among a sample of children (1-15 years). The large correlation between the ASD-OC and Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) total scores was significant (r = .83), establishing convergent validity for the ASD-OC. To determine divergent validity, the correlation between the ASD-OC total score and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (VABS-II) Daily Living Skills domain score was analyzed. Although this negative correlation was significant (r = -.43), autistic symptom severity has previously been shown to adversely affect daily living skills. Finally, diagnostic groups (i.e., ASD, atypically developing, typically developing) were compared on ASD-OC total scores to establish criterion validity. The ASD group demonstrated significantly higher scores, indicating greater impairment than both the atypically and typically developing groups. ASD-OC scores were also examined by age group (i.e., < 36 months; >= 36 months). The implications of these results, as well as directions for future research, are discussed.
    Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities 12/2013; 7(1):14-33. DOI:10.1080/19315864.2012.704490
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a lifelong disability for which prevalence rates continue to increase. Persons with ASD vary widely in both severity of disability and services required. Therefore it is important to identify trends in research and evaluate progress in the field. The current study uses a journal analysis to evaluate research over a 12 year period in three prominent autism focused research journals: Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, and Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. Findings include identification of trends in research designs, sample characteristics, and interventions.
    Exceptionality 07/2014; 22(3):158-172. DOI:10.1080/09362835.2013.865532 · 0.59 Impact Factor