Novel on-site sample preparation approach with a portable agitator using functional polymer-coated multi-fibers for the microextraction of organophosphorus pesticides in seawater.

Department of Chemistry, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, KFUPM Box 1059, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.
Journal of Chromatography A (Impact Factor: 4.61). 02/2011; 1218(5):654-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.12.033
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A novel on-site sample preparation approach for the organophosphorus pesticides (OPPs) using functional polymer-coated fibers with a portable agitation device has been developed and demonstrated. In this approach, a handheld battery-operated electric toothbrush was used to provide agitation of the sample solution at the sampling site to facilitate extraction. A functional conjugated polymer (2-(9,9-bis(6-bromo-2-ethylhexyl)9-H-fluoren-2-yl)benzene-1,4-diamine) was coated on commercial Technora fibers (each strand consisted of 1000 filaments, each of diameter ca. 9.23μm) which were then used for extraction. After extraction, the fibers were brought back to the laboratory in an icebox. The analytes were subsequently desorbed by organic solvent and the extract was analysed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Six OPPs, triethylphosphorothiolate, thionazin, sulfotep, phorate, disulfoton and parathion were used as model compounds. Experimental parameters such as extraction time, desorption time, types of polymer fibers and fiber coatings as well the nature of desorption solvent were optimized in the laboratory prior to its on-site application of the procedure. Using optimum extraction conditions calibration curves were linear with correlation coefficient of 0.9748-0.9998 over the concentration range of 0.1-10μgl(-1). The method detection limits (at a signal-to-noise ratio of 3) were in the range of 0.3-30.3ngl(-1), which were lower than what could be achieved with solid-phase extraction performed at the laboratory. The proposed method was evaluated for the on-site extraction of OPPs in seawater samples.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since its introduction in 1990s, different configurations of solid-phase microextraction (SPME) have been evaluated for different applications, and can be classified into the static and dynamic techniques. The current review briefly discusses the development of the techniques applied to reduce extraction time and/or to enhance extraction efficiency. It is also reviews selective microextraction techniques, such as molecularly-imprinted polymer, immunoaffinity, restricted access material and aptamer sol-gel SPME.
    TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 11/2013; 51:13–22. · 6.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A novel solid phase microextraction (SPME) fiber was prepared and coupled with gas chromatography corona discharge ion mobility spectrometry (GC-CD-IMS) based on polypyrrole/montmorillonite nanocomposites for the simultaneous determination of diazinon and fenthion. The nanocomposite polymer was coated using a three-electrode electrochemical system and directly deposited on a Ni-Cr wire by applying a constant potential. The scanning electron microscopy images revealed that the new fiber exhibited a rather porous and homogenous surface. The thermal stability of the fabricated fiber was investigated by thermogravimetric analysis. The effects of different parameters influencing the extraction efficiency such as extraction temperature and time, salt addition, stirring rate, the amount of nanoclay, and desorption temperature were investigated and optimized. The method was exhaustively evaluated in terms of sensitivity, recovery, and reproducibility. The linearity ranges of 0.05-10 and 0.08-10μgL(-1), and the detection limits of 0.020 and 0.035μgL(-1) were obtained for diazinon and fenthion, respectively. The relative standard deviation values were calculated to be lower than 5% and 8% for intra-day and inter-day, respectively. Finally, the developed method was applied to determine the diazinon and fenthion (as model compounds) in cucumber, lettuce, apple, tap and river water samples. The satisfactory recoveries revealed the capability of the two-dimensional separation technique (retention time in GC and drift time in IMS) for the analysis of complex matrices extracted by SPME.
    Analytica chimica acta 03/2014; 814C:69-78. · 4.31 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: On-site sampling and sample preparation favor portable, solventless or even solvent-free techniques. Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) has these advantages. This review focuses on developments between 2007 and early 2011 in microextraction techniques for on-site sampling and sample preparation, including fiber SPME, stir-bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), thin-film microextraction (TFME) and different types of in-needle SPME. The major trends in on-site applications of SPME appear to be fiber and thin-film SPME, microextraction by packed sorbent (MEPS) and the sorbent-packed needle-trap device (NTD). We discuss and compare several aspects of these types of SPME in on-site applications. We also describe sorbent phases for SPME that benefit on-site applications. Finally, we provide a perspective on SPME-based techniques for on-site applications.
    TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 11/2011; 30(10):1568-1574. · 6.61 Impact Factor