Liver Transplantation for Hepatic Metastases of Neuroendocrine Pancreatic Tumors: A Survival-Based Analysis

Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, Essen, Germany.
Transplantation (Impact Factor: 3.78). 03/2011; 91(5):575-82. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182081312
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Liver transplantation (LT) has been accepted as a treatment in selected cases of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with hepatic metastases.
A systematic review of the literature was conducted to evaluate long-term patient survival in the instances of LT for pancreatic NET. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses and survival analysis were performed.
Fifty-three clinical studies were screened. Data from 20 studies encompassing 89 transplanted patients were included in the study. Most primary tumors were endocrine pancreatic tumors (n=69), with gastrinomas representing the most frequent diagnosis (n=21). There were 61 functioning pancreatic NET. Simultaneous LT and pancreatic NET resections were performed in 45 instances. Cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival was 71%, 55%, and 44%, respectively, with a calculated mean survival of 54.45±6.31 months. Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIPomas) had the best overall survival. Recurrence-free survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 84%, 47%, and 47%, respectively. Recipient age more than or equal to 55 years (P=0.0242) and simultaneous LT-pancreatic resection (P=0.0132) were found to be significant predictors of worse survival by both univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses. A scoring system was developed, with prognostic points assigned as follows: age more than or equal to 55 years:age less than 55 years=1:0 points and simultaneous LT-pancreatic resection:LT alone=1:0 points. This stratification delineated three separate population samples corresponding to patients with scores of 0, 1, and 2, respectively. The calculated 5-year survival for scores 0, 1, and 2 was 61%, 40%, and 0%, respectively (P=0.0023).
Despite the limitations of this retrospective analysis, good results can be achieved even for pancreatic NET primaries if the above-proposed scoring system is applied.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The management of metastatic disease in pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) demands a multidisciplinary approach and the cooperation of several medical specialties. The role of surgery is critical, even when a radical excision cannot always be achieved. A PubMed search of relevant articles published up to February 2011 was performed to identify current information about PET liver metastases regarding diagnosis and management, with an emphasis on surgery. The early diagnosis of metastases and their accurate localization, most commonly in the liver, is very important. Surgical options include radical excision, and palliative excision to relieve symptoms in case of failure of medical treatment. The goal of the radical excision is to remove the primary tumor bulk and all liver metastases at the same time, but unfortunately it is not feasible in most cases. Palliative excisions include aggressive tumor debulking surgeries in well-differentiated carcinomas, trying to remove at least 90% of the tumor mass, combined with other additional destructive techniques such as hepatic artery embolization or chemoembolization to treat metastases or chemoembolization to relieve symptoms in cases of rapidly growing tumors. The combination of chemoembolization and systemic chemotherapy results in better response and survival rates. Other local destructive techniques include ethanol injection, cryotherapy and radiofrequency ablation. It seems that the current management of PETs can achieve important improvements, even in advanced cases.
    Hepatobiliary & pancreatic diseases international: HBPD INT 06/2011; 10(3):243-7. DOI:10.1016/S1499-3872(11)60040-4 · 1.17 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patients diagnosed with Neuroendocrine Tumors (NET) often are also diagnosed with Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases (NLM) during the course of their disease. NLM can cause significant morbidity and mortality, oftentimes much more than compared to patients with NET. Treatment options have been limited in the past, focusing on surgical resections, for which only a minority of patients are candidates. However, developments of new treatment modalities have progressed rapidly and patients with NLM now have significantly more options, including surgical-directed therapies; liver-directed therapies; and nonsurgical, non-liver-directed therapies. This review provides information about the roles of hepatic resection, orthotopic liver resection, radiofrequency ablation, hepatic artery embolization and hepatic artery chemoembolization, hepatic artery radioembolization and selective internal radiation therapy, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, systemic chemotherapy, biotherapies including somatostatin analogs and interferon-α, vascular endothelial growth factor and mTOR targets, and microRNA-regulated pathways. Given these new options, the clinician can tailor therapy specific to the patient diagnosed with NLM, thereby giving the patient the best possible chance of prolonged survival.
    10/2011; 2011:154541. DOI:10.4061/2011/154541
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A preponderance of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) will experience hepatic metastases during the course of their disease. Many diagnoses of NETs are made only after the neoplasms have spread from their primary gastroenteropancreatic sites to the liver. This paper reviews current evidence-based treatments for neuroendocrine hepatic metastases, encompassing surgery, hepatic artery embolization (HAE) and chemoembolization (HACE), radioembolization, hepatic artery infusion (HAI), thermal ablation (radiofrequency, microwave, and cryoablation), alcohol ablation, and liver transplantation as therapeutic modalities. Consideration of a multidisciplinary approach to liver-directed therapy is strongly encouraged to limit morbidity and mortality in this patient population.
    10/2011; 2011:452343. DOI:10.4061/2011/452343
Show more