Return-to-play decisions: are they the team physician's responsibility?

Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 341 Galvez St., Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Clinical journal of sport medicine: official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine (Impact Factor: 1.5). 01/2011; 21(1):25-30. DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3182095f92
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Return-to-play (RTP) decisions are a central component of the Team Physician's clinical work, yet there is little more than anecdotal reference to these in the literature. We recently published a 3-step model for return-to-play medical decision making and, in the current paper, undertook a systematic review of the literature to determine the level of evidence in support of this model.
PubMed, Web of Science, and CINAHL electronic databases. Any article specifically related to concussion, head injuries, neck injuries, illness, medical conditions (including cardiovascular and renal), and preparticipation in sport or that reported RTP as a clinical outcome was excluded. Any article that contained a discussion on one of the components of the 3-step decision-based RTP model was included.
We reviewed 148 articles that met the criteria for inclusion and found 98 review articles, 39 original articles, 6 case reports, and 5 editorials. Of these, 141 articles mentioned Step 1 of the medical decision-making process for RTP (Medical Factors), 26 mentioned Step 2 (Sport Risk Modifiers), and 20 mentioned Step 3 (Decision Modifiers). Of the 148 articles in total, only 13 focused on RTP as the main subject and the remaining 135 mentioned RTP anecdotally. Of these 13 articles, 5 were reviews, 4 were editorials, and 4 were original research.
Although 148 articles we retrieved mention RTP in relation to a specific injury, medical condition, or specific topic, only 13 articles focused specifically on the RTP decision-making process, and 6 of 13 were restricted to Step 1 of the 3-step model (Medical Factors). Return-to-play is a fertile field for research and thought leadership beginning with a focus on the Team Physician's appropriate role in RTP decision making, particularly considering the factors identified in Step 3 (Decision Modification).

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While provisions of youth sports concussion laws are very similar, little is known as to how they are being implemented, factors that promote or impede implementation, or the level of compliance in each jurisdiction. We aimed to describe state experiences with implementation in order to inform ongoing efforts to reduce the harm of sports-related traumatic brain injury and to guide future evaluations of the laws’ impacts and the development of future public health laws. We conducted key-informant interviews in 35 states with recently enacted concussion legislation. States varied considerably in their readiness and capacity for implementation. Factors facilitating implementation included existing partnerships, procedures, and resources; centralized implementation authority; prior related efforts; and involvement in the policymaking process by those now charged with implementation. Inhibitors included ambiguous statutory language, unclear delegation of authority, and compliance difficulties. Ongoing challenges persist, including primary prevention; determining which providers are qualified to make return-to-play assessments and contents of those assessments; compliance difficulties in rural and under-served areas; and unclear responsibility for enforcement. Despite the similarity of youth sports concussion laws, early evidence suggests there is considerable variation in their implementation. These findings are critical for ongoing empirical investigations to accurately evaluate the laws’ provisions and to identify successful legal approaches to protecting young athletes.
    The Journal of Law Medicine &amp Ethics 09/2014; 42(3). · 0.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Die Wiederaufnahme von Wettkampfaktivitäten ist für Athleten nach Spondylodesen von zentraler Bedeutung. Empfehlungen zu Bedingungen und Zeitpunkt auf Basis systematischer Untersuchungen liegen bis dato nicht vor. Ziel Das Ziel der Arbeit ist es, eine Übersicht hinsichtlich Zeitpunkt und Kriterien der Rückkehr zur sportlichen Aktivität bei Erwachsenen nach degenerationsbedingter Fusionsoperation im LWS-Bereich bereitzustellen. Material und Methode Zwei unabhängige Untersucher recherchierten relevante Literatur unter Einbezug von MeSH-Terms in MEDLINE. Zielgrößen waren der Zeitpunkt sowie die Entscheidungskriterien für die Rückkehr zu sportlicher Aktivität („return to play“, RTP). Ergebnisse Aktuell sind keine randomisiert kontrollierten Studien zu RTP nach spinaler Fusion unter Beachtung der Ein- und Ausschlusskriterien veröffentlicht. Fünf der eingeschlossenen Studien basieren auf Originaldaten, größtenteils handelt es sich um narrative Übersichtsarbeiten mit geringem Evidenzniveau. Zusätzlich zu den Übersichtsarbeiten liegen eine Beobachtungsstudie, zwei Expertenbefragungen und zwei Modellentwicklungen bzw. -bewertungen vor. Schlussfolgerungen Patienten müssen nach einer spinalen Fusionsoperation für eine positive RTP-Entscheidung literaturbasiert folgende Kriterien erfüllen: 1) Abgeschlossene Remodellierung der betroffenen Gewebe, 2) Gewährleistung der Sicherheit des Athleten und anderer Personen im Rahmen des Trainings und Wettkampfes, 3) Wiederausbildung sportartspezifischer Fähigkeiten und 4) psychosoziale Bereitschaft für RTP. RTP kann bereits 6 Monate postoperativ angestrebt werden; evtl. ist eine Rückkehr zu Vollkontakt- bzw. kollisionsgefährdeten Sportarten kontraindiziert. Abstract Background Return to play (RTP) and competition following spinal fusion is of particular importance for athletes. There is a lack of guidelines for decision making in RTP processes. Objective The purpose of this work was to provide a systematic review of the criteria and time of return in the RTP decision process for adults undergoing lumbar spinal fusion. Methods Two independent investigators searched MEDLINE using MeSH terms. Targeted outcomes were criteria for return to play decisions and total duration of the RTP process. Results So far, no prospective randomized controlled trials on RTP after spinal fusion considering inclusion and exclusion criteria are available. Five of the included studies are based on original data. Most of the identified studies are narrative reviews and, thus, exhibit low evidence levels. In addition to the narrative reviews, one observational study, two expert opinion surveys and two model development studies were found. Conclusion Based on the literature research, a positive RTP decision can be made if the following criteria are fulfilled: (1) anatomical and functional healing is complete, (2) safety of the athlete and secondary subjects during training and competition is guaranteed, (3) sport-specific skills are regained, and (4) patient is psychosocially ready. The RTP process can often be successfully initiated 6 months after surgery; some patients however, will never manage the return to full-contact sports and/or sports with risk of collision.
    Der Orthopäde 11/2014; 43(12):1100-5. · 0.67 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Traumatic injuries to the extremities are common in athletic competitions. The practitioner providing coverage of sporting events must be prepared to diagnose and provide initial treatment of these injuries. A thorough history and physical examination should result in a provisional diagnosis. Many injuries will require subsequent radiographs or orthopedic consultation. Limb threatening emergencies are rare but must be promptly recognized and referred to a hospital. Early treatment can protect athletes from further injury and may hasten their return to competition. Some athletes with extremity trauma can return to the contest, but this decision must be made on an individual basis.
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 10/2014;

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 4, 2014