Telling stories: Gender differences in peers’ emotion talk and communication style

Kingston University, UK.
British Journal of Developmental Psychology (Impact Factor: 1.96). 11/2010; 29(Pt 4):707-21. DOI: 10.1348/2044-835X.002003
Source: PubMed


Eighty girls and 64 boys (M= 6 years; 8 months, SD= .65) narrated a wordless picture book in mixed- or same-gender dyads. In mixed-gender as well as same-gender dyads, girls used more emotion explanations than did boys. Combined across dyad type, girls used more emotion labels than did boys. Girls used a higher proportion of collaborative speech acts than did boys in same-gender dyads, but girls and boys used the same amount in mixed-gender dyads. Whereas girls used a higher proportion of informing acts in mixed-gender dyads than did boys, boys used more than did girls in same-gender dyads. The findings support contextual models of gender and suggest that speaker as well as partner gender influence emotion expression and conversational style.

19 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Individuals with autism and schizophrenia spectrum disorders exhibit similar social, language, and repetitive behavior symptoms. However, there have been few studies comparing specific differences in these domains in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), versus those at ultra high risk for developing psychotic disorders (UHR) or for those with first episode schizophrenia (FE). This work has implications for understanding the comparative neurobiology of these disorders, for identification of precursors to psychosis and risk prediction, and for intervention. Objectives: The first goal of the study is to distinguish behavioral profiles of ASD, FE, and UHR across domains of reciprocal social interaction, structural and pragmatic language, and sensory/motor symptoms. The second goal is to begin to develop hypotheses about shared genetic and neurobiological mechanisms in ASD, schizophrenia spectrum, and other neurodevelopmental disorders. Finally we seek to consider dimensional rather than categorical approaches to characterizing symptomatology. Methods: Four groups of 15 patients aged 12-18 diagnosed using gold standard measures as being ASD, UHR, FE, or typically developing (TYP) were ascertained from a clinically referred sample. Parents completed common autism research measures including the Social Communication Questionnaire, the Social Responsiveness Scale, the Children’s Communication Checklist-2, and the Short Sensory Profile. Results: Based on SCQ, 6% and 7 % of each UHR and EPP cohorts respectively exhibited symptoms consistent with an ASD diagnosis. On the CCC-2, ASD demonstrate the highest level of global language impairment, however UHR and FE evidenced intermediate levels of impairment between ASD and TYP. UHR and FE exhibited more scripted language, less coherent speech, and increased language context violations relative to TYP. UHR resembled ASD in their tendency to talk repetitively about topics without regard for listener interest, while FE resembled ASD in relational aspects of communication as well structural language production. On the SRS, FE and UHR demonstrated similar impairments in reciprocal social behavior to ASD with a reduction in social motivation. ASD and FE were similarly impaired in lack of social awareness conversational skills, and autistic mannerisms. On the Short Sensory Profile, ASD, FE, and UHR shared comparable levels of sensitivity to Movement, Taste/smell, and increased Sensory Seeking behaviors while ASD and FE demonstrated similar low levels of energy. Conclusions: In this pilot sample, UHR and FE had about a 7% prevalence of ASD as determined by SCQ, however UHR and FE show symptoms that are generally of intermediate severity to TYP and ASD. Notable exceptions are that EPP and ASD share deficits in social awareness, conversational skills, autistic mannerisms, and low energy. UHR, unlike FE, show inappropriate social initiations comparable to ASD. While ASD tend to display worse language, social, and sensory/motor symptoms than other groups, specific impairments in social relational aspects of communication and some elements of sensory/motor atypicalities are similarly impaired in UHR and FE. Given the similarity of social and pragmatic language impairments across the ASD, UHR, and EP cohorts, social intervention and occupational therapy strategies for ASD may also be appropriate and useful for UHR and FE.
    International Meeting for Autism Research 2009; 05/2009
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Individuals with autism and schizophrenia exhibit atypical language and social symptoms. The extent to which these symptoms are evident during development and in current functioning is unclear. Three groups of patients aged 11-20 diagnosed as clinical-high-risk for psychosis (CHR; n=15), first episode psychosis (FEP; n=16), and autism spectrum disorders (ASD; n=20), plus typically developing individuals (TYP; n=20) were compared on common autism parent-report questionnaires assessing social and language development and current functioning including the Social Communication Questionnaire, the Children's Communication Checklist, and the Social Reciprocity Scale. All clinical groups demonstrated atypical social and language development, with social impairment highest in ASD. Twenty percent of participants with CHR and FEP met diagnostic criteria for ASD as assessed by parent-report. ASD exhibited greater current syntactic, and pragmatic language symptoms including delayed echolalia, pedantic speech, and deficits in appreciating irony and sarcasm. All clinical groups exhibited current deficits in social functioning. CHR and FE had similar and intermediate levels of functioning relative to ASD and TYP, with CHR generally scoring closer to TYP, providing construct validity for the CHR diagnostic label. The results of this study suggest that ASDs, CHR, and FEP share common features of atypical neurodevelopment of language and social function. Evidence of impaired social reciprocity across both disorders and distinct language symptoms in ASDs provides important information for differential diagnosis and psychosis prevention, as well as leads for future investigations of comparative genetics and pathophysiology.
    Schizophrenia Research 03/2011; 131(1-3):146-51. DOI:10.1016/j.schres.2011.03.005 · 3.92 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There has been intensified interest in the neuropeptides oxytocin (OT) and arginine vasopressin (AVP) in autism spectrum disorders (ASD) given their role in affiliative and social behavior in animals, positive results of treatment studies using OT, and findings that genetic polymorphisms in the AVP-OT pathway are present in individuals with ASD. Nearly all such studies in humans have focused only on males. With this preliminary study, we provide basic and novel information on the involvement of OT and AVP in autism, with an investigation of blood plasma levels of these neuropeptides in 75 preadolescent and adolescent girls and boys ages 8-18: 40 with high-functioning ASD (19 girls, 21 boys) and 35 typically developing children (16 girls, 19 boys). We related neuropeptide levels to social, language, repetitive behavior, and internalizing symptom measures in these individuals. There were significant gender effects: Girls showed higher levels of OT, while boys had significantly higher levels of AVP. There were no significant effects of diagnosis on OT or AVP. Higher OT values were associated with greater anxiety in all girls, and with better pragmatic language in all boys and girls. AVP levels were positively associated with restricted and repetitive behaviors in girls with ASD but negatively (nonsignificantly) associated with these behaviors in boys with ASD. Our results challenge the prevailing view that plasma OT levels are lower in individuals with ASD, and suggest that there are distinct and sexually dimorphic mechanisms of action for OT and AVP underlying anxiety and repetitive behaviors. Autism Res 2013, ●●: ●●-●●. © 2013 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Autism Research 04/2013; 6(2). DOI:10.1002/aur.1270 · 4.33 Impact Factor