Article

Single-incision total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Department of Gynaecological Endoscopy, BEAMS Hospital, 674, 16 Cross Road, Behind Khar Gymkhana, Khar Pali, Mumbai 400052, India.
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery 01/2011; 7(1):78-82. DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.72389
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Single-incision laparoscopic surgery is an alternative to conventional multiport laparoscopy. Single-access laparoscopy using a transumbilical port affords maximum cosmetic benefits because the surgical incision is hidden in the umbilicus. The advantages of single-access laparoscopic surgery may include less bleeding, infection, and hernia formation and better cosmetic outcome and less pain. The disadvantages and limitations include longer surgery time, difficulty in learning the technique, and the need for specialized instruments. Ongoing refinement of the surgical technique and instrumentation is likely to expand its role in gynecologic surgery in the future. We perform single-incision total laparoscopic hysterectomy using three ports in the single transumbilical incision.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
107 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A three-stage restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the treatment of choice for the particularly debilitated patient with medically refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). Laparoscopic surgery has been shown to offer several advantages over the open approach in this setting. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery is an emerging minimally invasive strategy representing a truly scarless procedure for the first surgical step, namely, the total abdominal colectomy (TAC). Nine consecutive patients with medically refractory UC underwent a single-incision laparoscopic TAC between May and October 2010. All patients were on aggressive medical therapy with corticosteroids or immunosuppressors and were selected for this approach on the basis of their body habitus and the absence of relevant comorbidities. The whole operation was performed through a single access to the abdominal cavity, placed at the ostomy site marked preoperatively. Mean operating time was 142 ± 23 min, with an estimate blood loss of 108 ± 125 ml. No intraoperative complications or conversions to conventional laparoscopy or open surgery occurred. In all cases the postoperative course was uneventful. The return of bowel function was observed on postoperative day 1.7 ± 0.7, and patients could tolerate a solid diet on postoperative day 3 ± 0.5. The mean postoperative length of stay was 5.2 ± 1.3 days. In our experience, a single-incision laparoscopic approach to total abdominal colectomy for refractory ulcerative colitis has been shown to be safe and feasible. Initial results suggest that this technique can lead to improvements in short-term outcomes in selected patients.
    Surgical Endoscopy 09/2011; 26(3):862-8. · 3.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The recent emergence of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) has had a great impact on gynecology. As LESS grows in popularity, attention has been paid to the procedure's cosmetic benefits. Although in theory LESS is an ideal approach that leaves no visible scars and improves patients' quality of life, the outcomes are not always ideal according to recently published data. Therefore, alternative approaches, such as mini-laparoscopy, are also becoming more popular. Herein, we review randomized trials studying the benefits of LESS in gynecology and discuss alternative approaches. Finally, we propose the mimic approach as the next generation for non-visible scar surgery.
    Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery 06/2013;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to evaluate intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) with routine intraoperative cystoscopy (CYS) for enlarged uterus (>280 g). The patients, who underwent LH procedure in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Düzce University Faculty of Medicine between July 2012 and July 2013, were included in this study. Perioperative outcomes were compared between patients with and without enlarged uterus. Uterus weight of the operated patients ranges between 38 and 700 g. Mean uterus weight was 196.40 ± 142.32 g. Although we found longer operation time (148.75 ± 32.37 vs. 128.28 ± 27.58) and higher delta hemoglobin (2.98 ± 3.09 vs. 1.61 ± 1.29) in patients with enlarged uterus undergoing LH, these findings were not statistically significant (p = 0.077 and 0.058). No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of need for insertion of pelvic drainage (p = 0.664), duration of bladder catheterization (p = 0.673), time of first postoperative flatus (p = 0.509) and the duration of hospitalization (p = 0.844). None of the patients had postoperative fever. The two groups were not significantly different in terms of postoperative body temperature (p = 0.736). In normal uterus group, 1 patient developed ureterovaginal fistula and 1 patient required re-operation. No major complication was observed in large uterus group. In our study, we compared the outcomes of LH in patients with large uterus measuring up to 700 g. and patients with normal uterus, and we achieved successful results by making minor changes in the operation technique and performing diagnostic CYS at the end of the operation.
    Archives of Gynecology 11/2013; · 0.91 Impact Factor