Comparison study of growth plate fusion using MRI vs plain radiographs as used in age determination for exclusion of overaged football players

Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
British Journal of Sports Medicine (Impact Factor: 5.03). 12/2010; 46(4):273-8. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.074948
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT MRI of distal radius fusion is currently being used in the U17 World Cup to exclude overaged players. Developing countries that cannot afford to perform MRI on their players are using plain radiographs based on the same MRI criteria of fusion.
The aim of this study is to compare the grade of fusion of the left wrist distal radial growth plate between MRI and plain radiographs.
150 healthy male football players were grouped into five age groups ranging from 15 to 19 years old. Each participant had coronal T1-weighted MRI and plain radiograph of the left wrist. The degree of distal radius fusion was rated randomly by three radiologists using a six-stage grading system proposed by the FIFA Research Centre.
MRI assessment of distal radial growth plate fusion has good correlation with plain radiograph fusion (r=0.949). The mean of x-ray grading is higher than the MRI grading in the 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19 years old age groups with p=0.443, 0.001, 0.009, <0.001 and 0.003, respectively, using Wilcoxon signed ranked test. Intraobserver and interobserver correlations were high (r=0.9). T1 MRI correlation with chronological age (r=0.771) was close to plain radiographs (r=0.821) with p value of <0.001.
This article is of major importance as it is the first to show that x-rays significantly overrate the grading of fusion in this age group and therefore should not be used to exclude overaged players as is occurring now to the distress of many genuinely eligible players.

1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Ice hockey players are reportedly at increased risk to suffer hip injuries. This may be due to repetitive hip positions during the ice hockey skate stride. Objective To determine if specific tests used during a screening program can identify youth hockey players who are at risk of acetabular labral tears due to femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Design Prospective screening study. Setting Clinical centre screened elite youth hockey players. Participants 20 asymptomatic male (average age of 17.6 SD=0.5) ice hockey players who had signed IRB approved consent. Assessment of risk factors Participants underwent impingement testing, Flexion Abduction External Rotation (FABER) test, and range of motion and hip strength assessment prior to an MRI (3T) to determine hip alpha angle (AA) and labral pathology. Main outcome measurements Positive clinical findings of impingement correlate with the presence of labral pathology and high AA. Results 14 players had a positive clinical exam (+impingement test or+FABER test or decreased hip internal rotation). Players with a positive clinical exam had a significantly higher AA compared to those with no positive signs (68° vs 61°; p<0.025). Players with a positive clinical exam were 12.5 times (95% CI 1.1 to 143) more likely to have an AA 65° or greater. 12 of the 14 participants with a positive clinical exam also had partial acetabular labral tears. Conclusion With this screening protocol, we were able to identify those patients with higher AA, which are considered at high risk. These players also demonstrated labral tears on MRI. We recommend that hip screening utilizing the impingement test, FABER test, and assessment of hip internal rotation be conducted as the initial screening of athletes with hip pain to assess for symptomatic FAI.
    British Journal of Sports Medicine 04/2011; 45(4):322. DOI:10.1136/bjsm.2011.084038.36 · 5.03 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Problems with accurate chronological age (CA) reporting occur on a more or less regular basis in youth sports. As a result, there is increasing discussion of age verification. Use of 'bone age' or skeletal age (SA) for the purpose of estimating or verifying CA has been used in medicolegal contexts for many years and also in youth sport competitions. This article reviews the concept of SA, and the three most commonly used methods of assessment. Variation in SA within CA groups among male soccer players and female artistic gymnasts is evaluated relative to the use of SA as a tool for verification of CA. Corresponding data for athletes in several other sports are also summarized. Among adolescent males, a significant number of athletes will be identified as older than a CA cutoff because of advanced skeletal maturation when they in fact have a valid CA. SA assessments of soccer players are comparable to MRI assessments of epiphyseal-diaphyseal union of the distal radius in under-17 soccer players. Both protocols indicate a relatively large number of false negatives among youth players aged 15-17 years. Among adolescent females, a significant number of age-eligible artistic gymnasts will be identified as younger than the CA cutoff because of later skeletal maturation when in fact they have a valid CA. There is also the possibility of false positives-identifying gymnasts as younger than the CA cutoff because of late skeletal maturation when they have a valid CA. The risk of false negatives and false positives implies that SA is not a valid indicator of CA.
    Sports Medicine 11/2011; 41(11):925-47. DOI:10.2165/11590300-000000000-00000 · 5.32 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Unprecedented changes in both the scale and the complexity of international migration have led to international concern and controversy over the assessment of age in children and young people subject to immigration control or seeking asylum who say they are children yet have no documents to prove their stated age. The article reviews the existing evidence on the reliability of medical and non-medical techniques for the assessment of chronological age. There is evidence that radiography (X-rays) of bones and teeth, which is increasingly relied upon by immigration authorities, is imprecise, unethical and potentially unlawful, and should not be used for age assessment. Medical techniques including X-rays continue to be relied upon in the absence of an alternative approach resulting in legal challenges and uncertainty for children and young people. Further work is needed to establish a process for age assessment based on a 'holistic' multi-disciplinary approach which focuses not on chronological age exclusively but rather on the needs of children and young people subject to immigration control.
    British Medical Bulletin 05/2012; 102(1):17-42. DOI:10.1093/bmb/lds014 · 3.95 Impact Factor
Show more