Low O2 dissociation barrier on Pt(111) due to adsorbate-adsorbate interactions.

Stanford Institute for Materials and Energy Sciences, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Rd, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA.
The Journal of Chemical Physics (Impact Factor: 3.16). 12/2010; 133(22):224701. DOI:10.1063/1.3512618
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT O(2) dissociation on Pt(111) has been followed at low and saturation coverage using temperature-programmed x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and simulated with mean-field kinetic modeling, yielding dissociation (E(a)) and desorption (E(d)) barriers of 0.32 and 0.36 eV, respectively. Density functional theory calculations show that E(a) is strongly influenced by the O-O interatomic potential in the atomic final state: of the supercells considered, that which maximizes attractive third-nearest-neighbor interactions in the atomic final state yields both the lowest computed dissociation barrier (0.24 eV) and the best agreement with experiment. It is proposed that the effect of adsorbate-adsorbate interactions must be considered when modeling catalytic processes involving dissociative steps.

0 0
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many DFT studies of O(2) dissociation on Pt(111) give conflicting information on preferred paths and final states. Here we report large p(4 × 4) unit cell minimum energy pathway evaluations and compare O(2) adsorption and dissociated states on Pt(111). Calculations reveal how the pathways for O(2) dissociation starting from top-fcc-bridge, top-hcp-bridge, and top-bridge-top sites are interconnected. They also provide a direct reaction pathway for the dissociation of an O(2) molecule from a top-fcc-bridge into an hcp and an fcc site, which is consistent with low temperature scanning tunneling microscope experiments. Such a pathway is shown to be considerably perturbed by the presence of co-adsorbed oxygen atoms. We quantify the coverage dependence through the construction of a Brønsted-Evans-Polanyi relationship relating the O(2) dissociation activation energies to the binding energies of the dissociated O atoms. We also show that all pathways starting from a top-fcc-bridge site give the smallest barriers for O(2) dissociation.
    Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 10/2012; · 3.83 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Oxide formation on palladium surfaces impacts the activity and selectivity of Pd-based catalysts, which are widely employed under oxygen rich operating conditions. To investigate oxidation processes over Pd catalysts at time and length scales inaccessible to quantum based computational methods, we have developed a Pd∕O interaction potential for the ReaxFF reactive force field. The parameters of the ReaxFF potential were fit against an extensive set of quantum data for both bulk and surface properties. Using the resulting potential, we conducted molecular dynamics simulations of oxide formation on Pd(111), Pd(110), and Pd(100) surfaces. The results demonstrate good agreement with previous experimental observations; oxygen diffusion from the surface to the subsurface occurs faster on the Pd(110) surface than on the Pd(111) and Pd(100) surfaces under comparable conditions at high temperatures and pressures. Additionally, we developed a ReaxFF-based hybrid grand canonical Monte Carlo∕molecular dynamics (GC-MC∕MD) approach to assess the thermodynamic stability of oxide formations. This method is used to derive a theoretical phase diagram for the oxidation of Pd935 clusters in temperatures ranging from 300 K to 1300 K and oxygen pressures ranging from 10(-14) atm to 1 atm. We observe good agreement between experiment and ReaxFF, which validates the Pd∕O interaction potential and demonstrates the feasibility of the hybrid GC-MC∕MD method for deriving theoretical phase diagrams. This GC-MC∕MD method is novel to ReaxFF, and is well suited to studies of supported-metal-oxide catalysts, where the extent of oxidation in metal clusters can significantly influence catalytic activity, selectivity, and stability.
    The Journal of Chemical Physics 07/2013; 139(4):044109. · 3.16 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Dec 24, 2013