Article

Determining the association of medical co-morbidity with subjective and objective cognitive performance in an inner city memory disorders clinic: a retrospective chart review.

Department of Psychiatry, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
BMC Geriatrics (Impact Factor: 2). 12/2010; 10:89. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-10-89
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Medical co-morbidity may be associated with impaired cognitive function based on prior studies. However, no studies to date have determined to what extent this association is linked to medical illness or other factors that may be linked to medical illness (such as education, income levels, depression or subjective memory loss). The present study examined how medical co-morbidity, socioeconomic status (defined as residential SES), education and depression are associated with subjective and objective memory function in a sample of patients recruited from a university affiliated Memory Disorders Clinic located in a large Canadian inner city teaching hospital.
Data was collected from 85 consecutive referrals to an Inner City Memory Disorders Clinic including socio-demographic characteristics, cognitive status and medical co-morbidity. Descriptive and correlational analyses were conducted.
Impaired objective cognitive function correlated significantly with increased medical co-morbidity and partially with education but not with residential SES or depression. Elevated memory complaints correlated significantly with depression, inversely with residential SES and not at all with medical co-morbidity or education.
Increased medical co-morbidity is significantly associated with impaired cognitive performance but not with subjective memory complaints in an Inner City Memory Clinic sample.

1 Bookmark
 · 
65 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Late onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common cause of progressive cognitive dysfunction and dementia. Despite considerable progress in elucidating the molecular pathology of this disease, we are not yet close to unraveling its etiopathogenesis. The hippocampus is at the epicenter of cognition being associated with learning and memory. A battery of neurotoxic modifiers has been delineated that may unleash deleterious heterogeneous pathologic impacts. Synergistically they target hippocampus causing its neuronal degeneration, gray matter volume atrophy, and progressive cognitive decline. The neurotoxic factors include aging, stress, depression, hypoxia/hypoxemia, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, alcohol abuse, smoking, malnutrition, and polypharmacy—to name a few. Addressing “upstream pathologies” due to these multiple and heterogeneous neurotoxic modifiers vis-a-vis hippocampal dysfunction is of paramount importance. The downstream-generated inflammatory cytokines, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, hypoperfusion, excitotoxicity, amyloid beta, and neurofibrillary tangles may then trigger and sustain neurocognitive pathology. The failure of clinical trials in AD is due in part to this complex multifactorial neurotoxic–pathophysiological labyrinth. The key is to employ appropriate preventive and treatment strategies prior to significant hippocampus damage and its dysfunction. Prevention/reversal of the diverse neurotoxic impacts, delineated here, should be an integral part of therapeutic armamentarium, in order to ameliorate hippocampus dysfunction and to enhance memory in aging, mild cognitive impairment, and AD. Throughout, the paper highlights both the challenges presented by the ever present neurotoxic onslaught, and the opportunities to overcome them. Hence, arresting AD pathogenesis is achievable through early intervention. A targeted approach may ameliorate neurocognitive pathology and attenuate memory deterioration.
    Neurotoxicity Research 07/2013; DOI:10.1007/s12640-013-9407-2 · 3.15 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Los síntomas mnésicos son muy frecuentes. Se suelen considerar como el reflejo de un envejecimiento normal, mejor o peor aceptado. Sin embargo, pueden ser la primera manifestación de una enfermedad que dé lugar a una demencia o a un estado depresivo atípico. Cualquiera de estos dos cuadros justifica un tratamiento y un manejo adecuados. Por tanto, estos síntomas se deben tomar siempre en serio. La primera etapa de la evaluación diagnóstica es la anamnesis centrada en las características de los síntomas y en su repercusión en la vida diaria. Estos dos aspectos deben determinarse con el paciente y, obligatoriamente, con sus allegados inmediatos. Se debe buscar la repercusión en las actividades domésticas y de autocuidado, pero también en lo referente a ocupaciones concretas y recreativas. La existencia de trastornos conductuales es un elemento importante de la anamnesis y se debe buscar mediante un interrogatorio si no se refiere de forma espontánea. Una evaluación cognitiva rápida permite ayudar a diferenciar a los pacientes que ya tienen una demencia establecida de las personas sanas y de los pacientes que tienen trastornos más sutiles, que será mejor remitir a una «consulta de memoria» para un estudio más detallado.
    03/2014; 18(1):1–4. DOI:10.1016/S1636-5410(14)66721-0
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We examined the association between responses on a screening questionnaire and objective performance on a computer-administered test of cognitive abilities in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The Cognitive Symptom Inventory (CSI) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS) questionnaires were compared in patients with SLE or rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) was used to evaluate cognitive performance in patients with SLE. Efficiency of performance was measured by "throughput" (number of correct responses per minute) and "inverse efficiency" (response speed/proportion of correct responses). Linear regression was applied to log-transformed CSI scores to examine their associations with ANAM scores and other factors. Patients with SLE (n = 68) or RA (n = 33) were similar in age, sex, ethnicity, and education status (p > 0.05). Patients with SLE had higher total CSI scores (33.6 ± 10.5 vs 29.4 ± 6.8, respectively; p = 0.041) and attention/concentration subscale CSI scores (15.7 ± 5.3 vs 13.3 ± 3.4; p = 0.016) compared to patients with RA. In patients with SLE there was a positive association between CSI scores and neuropsychiatric (NP) events at the time of testing (p = 0.0006), HADS anxiety (p < 0.0001), and depression (p < 0.0001) scores. After adjustment for age, education, disease duration, and NP events at the time of testing, there was no significant association (p > 0.05) between ANAM and CSI scores in patients with SLE. The results were similar using either "throughput" or "inverse efficiency" or the number of impaired ANAM subscales after adjustment for simple reaction time. The CSI self-report questionnaire of cognitive symptoms does not reliably screen for efficiency of cognitive processing in patients with SLE. Rather, cognitive complaints reported in the CSI are influenced by the presence of anxiety and depression.
    The Journal of Rheumatology 06/2012; 39(7):1371-7. DOI:10.3899/jrheum.111504 · 3.17 Impact Factor

Full-text (4 Sources)

Download
26 Downloads
Available from
May 16, 2014