Article

The influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: a systematic review of the literature.

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
Milbank Quarterly (Impact Factor: 5.06). 12/2010; 88(4):500-59. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00611.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The mixed results of success among QI initiatives may be due to differences in the context of these initiatives.
The business and health care literature was systematically reviewed to identify contextual factors that might influence QI success; to categorize, summarize, and synthesize these factors; and to understand the current stage of development of this research field.
Forty-seven articles were included in the final review. Consistent with current theories of implementation and organization change, leadership from top management, organizational culture, data infrastructure and information systems, and years involved in QI were suggested as important to QI success. Other potentially important factors identified in this review included: physician involvement in QI, microsystem motivation to change, resources for QI, and QI team leadership. Key limitations in the existing literature were the lack of a practical conceptual model, the lack of clear definitions of contextual factors, and the lack of well-specified measures.
Several contextual factors were shown to be important to QI success, although the current body of literature lacks adequate definitions and is characterized by considerable variability in how contextual factors are measured across studies. Future research should focus on identifying and developing measures of context tied to a conceptual model that examines context across all levels of the health care system and explores the relationships among various aspects of context.

1 Bookmark
 · 
147 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The idea of quality management systems in recent years in the public and governmental sectors have attracted attention of officials and experts . Can say that correct deployment of these systems is one of the most important tools that can assist the governments in this matter, and lead to success. In this regard, We decided to survey requirements of this program in the hospitals. Methods: we survey the comments of 85 managers and supervisors of hospitals with five factors influencing on this program and then compared with the results of national assessment. In a descriptive cross-sectional study, we used a five-part questionnaire with 40 Likert-type questions for data collection that Validated with Delphi method. analysis of variance and T-test were used for statistical analysis. Results: among the five factors, Leadership and management (%57,88) Organizational structure % (62,03) Human resource development (% 60,58) customer focus (% 56,35) and Team work (% 58,41) proved to be acceptable.(with assuming 50% accepted in the five-factor).There was significant difference among the total means of influencing factors in the studies hospitals (P-value <0.0001) also between Total score (comments of managers and supervisors) and score of national assessment there was no significant differences.(P-value=0.2) Conclusion: It can be said that attention of managers to Leadership and management, Organizational structure, Human resource development, Customer focus and Team work will make effective and efficient implementation Accreditation Program.
    ...; 01/2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Depression is a major cause of morbidity and cost in primary care patient populations. Successful depression improvement models, however, are complex. Based on organizational readiness theory, a practice¿s commitment to change and its capability to carry out the change are both important predictors of initiating improvement. We empirically explored the links between relative commitment (i.e., the intention to move forward within the following year) and implementation capability.Methods The DIAMOND initiative administered organizational surveys to medical and quality improvement leaders from each of 83 primary care practices in Minnesota. Surveys preceded initiation of activities directed at implementation of a collaborative care model for improving depression care. To assess implementation capability, we developed composites of survey items for five types of organizational factors postulated to be collaborative care barriers and facilitators. To assess relative commitment for each practice, we averaged leader ratings on an identical survey question assessing practice priorities. We used multivariable regression analyses to assess the extent to which implementation capability predicted relative commitment. We explored whether relative commitment or implementation capability measures were associated with earlier initiation of DIAMOND improvements.ResultsAll five implementation capability measures independently predicted practice leaders¿ relative commitment to improving depression care in the following year. These included the following: quality improvement culture and attitudes (p =0.003), depression culture and attitudes (p <0.001), prior depression quality improvement activities (p <0.001), advanced access and tracking capabilities (p =0.03), and depression collaborative care features in place (p¿=¿0.03). Higher relative commitment (p¿=¿0.002) and prior depression quality improvement activities appeared to be associated with earlier participation in the DIAMOND initiative.Conclusions The study supports the concept of organizational readiness to improve quality of care and the use of practice leader surveys to assess it. Practice leaders¿ relative commitment to depression care improvement may be a useful measure of the likelihood that a practice is ready to initiate evidence-based depression care changes. A comprehensive organizational assessment of implementation capability for depression care improvement may identify specific barriers or facilitators to readiness that requires targeted attention from implementers.
    Implementation Science 12/2014; 9(1):173. · 3.47 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Through a national policy agreement, over 167 million Euros will be invested in the Swedish National Quality Registries (NQRs) between 2012 and 2016. One of the policy agreement¿s intentions is to increase the use of NQR data for quality improvement (QI). However, the evidence is fragmented as to how the use of medical registries and the like lead to quality improvement, and little is known about non-clinical use. The aim was therefore to investigate the perspectives of Swedish politicians and administrators on quality improvement based on national registry data.Methods Politicians and administrators from four county councils were interviewed. A qualitative content analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was performed.ResultsThe politicians¿ and administrators¿ perspectives on the use of NQR data for quality improvement were mainly assigned to three of the five CFIR domains. In the domain of intervention characteristics, data reliability and access in reasonable time were not considered entirely satisfactory, making it difficult for the politico-administrative leaderships to initiate, monitor, and support timely QI efforts. Still, politicians and administrators trusted the idea of using the NQRs as a base for quality improvement. In the domain of inner setting, the organizational structures were not sufficiently developed to utilize the advantages of the NQRs, and readiness for implementation appeared to be inadequate for two reasons. Firstly, the resources for data analysis and quality improvement were not considered sufficient at politico-administrative or clinical level. Secondly, deficiencies in leadership engagement at multiple levels were described and there was a lack of consensus on the politicians¿ role and level of involvement. Regarding the domain of outer setting, there was a lack of communication and cooperation between the county councils and the national NQR organizations.Conclusions The Swedish experiences show that a government-supported national system of well-funded, well-managed, and reputable national quality registries needs favorable local politico-administrative conditions to be used for quality improvement; such conditions are not yet in place according to local politicians and administrators.
    Implementation Science 12/2014; 9(1):777. · 3.47 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
966 Downloads
Available from
May 29, 2014