Article

The Influence of Context on Quality Improvement Success in Health Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature

University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Milbank Quarterly (Impact Factor: 5.06). 12/2010; 88(4):500-59. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00611.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The mixed results of success among QI initiatives may be due to differences in the context of these initiatives.
The business and health care literature was systematically reviewed to identify contextual factors that might influence QI success; to categorize, summarize, and synthesize these factors; and to understand the current stage of development of this research field.
Forty-seven articles were included in the final review. Consistent with current theories of implementation and organization change, leadership from top management, organizational culture, data infrastructure and information systems, and years involved in QI were suggested as important to QI success. Other potentially important factors identified in this review included: physician involvement in QI, microsystem motivation to change, resources for QI, and QI team leadership. Key limitations in the existing literature were the lack of a practical conceptual model, the lack of clear definitions of contextual factors, and the lack of well-specified measures.
Several contextual factors were shown to be important to QI success, although the current body of literature lacks adequate definitions and is characterized by considerable variability in how contextual factors are measured across studies. Future research should focus on identifying and developing measures of context tied to a conceptual model that examines context across all levels of the health care system and explores the relationships among various aspects of context.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Peter Margolis, Aug 09, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
197 Views
    • "Many also note the importance of multidisciplinary teams to the effectiveness of any improvement efforts in patient transfers and transitions (Bost et al., 2010; Cummings et al., 2012; Perry et al., 2008; Terrell and Miller, 2011; Terrell et al., 2009). And finally, there is growing recognition for the importance of the context of quality improvement initiatives on their effectiveness and sustainability and their generalizability to other settings (Kaplan et al., 2010; McDonald, 2013). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract: The “siloed” approach to healthcare delivery contributes to communication challenges and to potential patient harm when patients transfer between settings. This article reports on the evaluation of a demonstration in 10 rural communities to improve the safety of nursing facility (NF) transfers to hospital emergency departments by forming interprofessional teams of hospital, emergency medical service, and NF staff to develop and implement tools and protocols for standardizing critical interfacility communication pathways and information sharing. We worked with each of the 10 teams to document current communication processes and information sharing tools and to design, implement, and evaluate strategies/tools to increase effective communication and sharing of patient information across settings. A mixed methods approach was used to evaluate changes from baseline in documentation of patient information shared across settings during the transfer process. Study findings showed significant improvement in key areas across the three settings, including infection status and baseline mental functioning. Improvement strategies and performance varied across settings; however, accurate and consistent information sharing of advance directives and medication lists remains a challenge. Study results demonstrate that with neutral facilitation and technical support, collaborative interfacility teams can assess and effectively address communication and information sharing problems that threaten patient safety.
    Journal for Healthcare Quality 01/2015; 37(1-1):55-65. DOI:10.1097/01.JHQ.0000460120.68190.15
  • Source
    • "Initially, we will examine indexing and unique key terms associated with known, relevant discussions of the topic (e.g. Greenhalgh et al. 2004, Greenhalgh & Peacock 2005, May et al. 2007, Hutchinson et al. 2010, Kaplan et al. 2010) and develop a strategy based on these terms. Results from this strategy will be screened and search terms reconsidered based on citations selected for inclusion. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: AimTo conduct a concept analysis of clinical practice contexts (work environments) that facilitate or militate against the uptake of research evidence by healthcare professionals in clinical practice. This will involve developing a clear definition of context by describing its features, domains and defining characteristics.Background The context where clinical care is delivered influences that care. While research shows that context is important to knowledge translation (implementation), we lack conceptual clarity on what is context, which contextual factors probably modify the effect of knowledge translation interventions (and hence should be considered when designing interventions) and which contextual factors themselves could be targeted as part of a knowledge translation intervention (context modification).DesignConcept analysis.Methods The Walker and Avant concept analysis method, comprised of eight systematic steps, will be used: (1) concept selection; (2) determination of aims; (3) identification of uses of context; (4) determination of defining attributes of context; (5) identification/construction of a model case of context; (6) identification/construction of additional cases of context; (7) identification/construction of antecedents and consequences of context; and (8) definition of empirical referents of context. This study is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (January 2014).DiscussionThis study will result in a much needed framework of context for knowledge translation, which identifies specific elements that, if assessed and used to tailor knowledge translation activities, will result in increased research use by nurses and other healthcare professionals in clinical practice, ultimately leading to better patient care.
    Journal of Advanced Nursing 11/2014; 71(5). DOI:10.1111/jan.12574 · 1.69 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "As listed above, examples of applications of TQM practices are available within a series of industries: manufacturing (Fotopoulos and Psomas, 2009; Hassan et al., 2012), health care (Kaplan et al., 2010), service (Feng et al., 2008), etc.. Although continuous attention is given to TQM within different industrial sectors, it is only in the last decade that researchers have started to investigate this issue within a particular company's unit, that is the R&D (among others, Kumar and Boyle, 2001; Petroni et al., 2003; Prajogo and Hong, 2008). "
    Journal of Technology Management and Innovation 07/2014; 9(2):157-171. DOI:10.4067/S0718-27242014000200012
Show more