Smokers Are Suckers: Should Incongruous Metaphors Be Used in Public Health Prevention?

American Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 4.55). 02/2011; 101(2):203-4. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.197996
Source: PubMed
Download full-text


Available from: Olivier Oullier, Oct 09, 2015
1 Follower
103 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In France, cognitive science (e.g., eye-tracking) and neuroscience (e.g., functional neuroimaging) are not used to develop and test anti-tobacco strategies. The newly found knowledge in behavioral and brain sciences could provide valuable insights in the understanding of attentional, emotional, memorization and decision-making processes at play when tobacco addicts are exposed to prevention messages. We argue that neuroscientific methods should be used in the fight against tobacco to better design and evaluate the impact of measures such as combined text and graphic (shock) warnings, neutral packets and support to people who want to stop smoking.
    Medecine sciences: M/S 11/2013; 29(11):1042-50. DOI:10.1051/medsci/20132911022 · 0.67 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A Food Imitating Product (FIP) is a household cleaner or a personal care product that exhibits food attributes in order to enrich consumption experience. As revealed by many cases worldwide, such a marketing strategy led to unintentional self-poisonings and deaths. FIPs therefore constitute a very serious health and public policy issue. To understand why FIPs are a threat, we first conducted a qualitative analysis on real-life cases of household cleaners and personal care products-related phone calls at a poison control center followed by a behavioral experiment. Unintentional self-poisoning in the home following the accidental ingestion of a hygiene product by a healthy adult is very likely to result from these products being packaged like foodstuffs. Our hypothesis is that FIPs are non-verbal food metaphors that could fool the brain of consumers. We therefore conducted a subsequent functional neuroimaging (fMRI) experiment that revealed how visual processing of FIPs leads to cortical taste inferences. Considered in the grounded cognition perspective, the results of our studies reveal that healthy adults can unintentionally categorize a personal care product as something edible when a food-like package is employed to market nonedible and/or dangerous products. Our methodology combining field (qualitative) and laboratory (behavioral and functional neuroimaging) findings could be of particular relevance for policy makers, as it can help screening products prior to their market release - e.g. the way they are packaged and how they can potentially confuse the mind of consumers - and therefore save lives.
    PLoS ONE 09/2014; 9(9):e100368. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0100368 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Advertising messages often are intended to ignite large-scale word-of-mouth campaigns among consumers. Drawing primarily from memetic theory, cognitive fit theory, and perceptual fluency, this research examines how rhetoric and cognitive load interact to enhance or diminish desirable effects such as retention of the original intent of the message (copy-fidelity) and engendering a desire to pass the message along (fecundity). Certain types of rhetoric are shown to aid this process by making some messages more attractive for retransmission and increasing retention of the original message, while cognitive load modifies which types are effective in accordance with cognitive fit and perceptual fluency. The results suggest that low-deviation high-complexity message forms (known as reversal) are the most effective for creating positive word-of-mouth outcomes and limiting potentially negative outcomes. Additionally, the results show that destabilization messages are more likely to yield mutated word-of-mouth messages that consumers still feel a strong desire to pass along to others. For practitioners, the results indicate what message forms should be used to effectively spark word-of-mouth campaigns.
    Psychology and Marketing 10/2015; 32(10). DOI:10.1002/mar.20839 · 1.13 Impact Factor