Article

Incidental vertebral compression fractures in imaging studies: Lessons not learned by radiologists.

Tommaso Bartalena, Department of Radiologiy, Poliambulatorio Privato Zappi Bartalena, Imola 40026, Italy.
World journal of radiology 10/2010; 2(10):399-404. DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v2.i10.399
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To assess radiologists reporting rates of incidental vertebral compression fractures in imaging studies.
We performed a review of the current literature on the prevalence and reporting rates of incidental vertebral compression fractures in radiologic examinations.
The bibliographic search revealed 12 studies: 7 studies using conventional radiology and 5 using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). The loss of height cut-off to define a vertebral fracture varied from 15% to 25%. Fracture prevalence was high (mean 21.1%; range 9.5%-35%) in both radiographic and MDCT studies (mean 21.6% and 20.2%, respectively). Reporting rates were low with a mean value of 27.4% (range 0%-66.3%) and were significantly lower in MDCT than in radiographic studies (mean 8.1% vs 41.1%). Notably, recent studies showed lower reporting rates than older studies.
Many scientific studies have confirmed a high prevalence of vertebral compression fractures as incidental findings on imaging studies. However, the underreporting of these fractures, as determined in our study, may negatively affect patient care.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
117 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Missed incidental vertebral compression fractures on computed tomography (CT) imaging are a common problem. Although numerous publications are available on this topic, recent publications still show a high percentage of such missed fractures. The rate of such missed fractures in the authors department is much lower than that in the reported literature when routine multiplanar reconstructions are used for reporting CT scans. Therefore, a more optimistic view on this topic seems to be justified.
    World journal of radiology. 12/2010; 2(12):472-3.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose:To retrospectively assess the prevalence and clinical outcomes of unreported vertebral compression fractures at abdominal computed tomography (CT).Materials and Methods:This HIPAA-compliant study had institutional review board approval; the need for informed consent was waived for this retrospective analysis. A total of 2041 consecutive adult patients (1640 women, 401 men; age range, 19-94 years) underwent both abdominal multidetector CT and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) within 6 months of each other between 2000 and 2007, before sagittal CT reconstructions were obtained routinely. Transverse (axial) and retrospective sagittal multidetector CT reconstructions were reviewed for the presence of moderate or severe vertebral body compression fractures of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine by using the Genant visual semiquantitative method. Twenty-six patients were excluded for evidence of pathologic fracture or for technical factors limiting compression fracture detection. Electronic medical records were reviewed for patients with moderate or severe compression fractures to determine whether the fracture was reported at prospective CT interpretation, was known previously, or was diagnosed subsequently. Correlation was made with central DXA T scores. Statistical analysis was performed with the Student t test and Fisher exact test.Results:At least one moderate or severe vertebral body compression fracture was identified retrospectively at CT in 97 patients (mean age, 70.8 years). Fractures involved one level in 67 and multiple levels in 30 patients, for a total of 141 fractures. In 81 (84%) patients, prospective CT diagnosis was not made. Patients in whom fractures were reported prospectively were significantly older and were more likely to have a severe compression fracture (P < .05). In 52 (64%) patients with an unreported fracture, the vertebral compression fracture was not known clinically. In 18 patients, subsequent diagnosis of a compression fracture was determined by means of another imaging study (median interval, 7 months). At DXA, 39 (48%) of 81 patients with unreported vertebral body compression fractures had a nonosteoporotic T score (greater than -2.5).Conclusion:Most clinically important vertebral body compression fractures in nontrauma patients at risk for low bone mineral density may go unreported at abdominal multidetector CT if sagittal reconstructions are not routinely evaluated.© RSNA, 2013.
    Radiology 02/2013; · 6.34 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Osteoporosis has finally been recognized as an important disorder in men. Men have osteoporotic fractures about 10 years later in life than women. Owing to increasing life expectancy, more fractures are predicted. Important risk factors for men include advancing age, smoking or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, glucocorticoid therapy, and androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. Other groups at risk for osteoporosis include those with alcohol abuse, men on enzyme-inducing antiseizure drugs, and those with malabsorption or history of surgery for peptic ulcer disease. History and physical examination will likely reveal secondary causes of osteoporosis. Some, but not all organizations, recommend screening for osteoporosis in men older than age 70. In the USA, The Department of Veterans Affairs recommends case finding rather than screening. Evaluation starts with bone mineral density testing by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine, hip, and in some cases forearm. A few laboratory tests can be helpful, including measurement of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Most studies of osteoporosis therapy in men are small; but alendronate, risedronate, zoledronic acid, and teriparatide are FDA-approved to increase bone density in men with osteoporosis. A new potent antiresorptive agent, denosumab, increased bone density dramatically in men on androgen deprivation therapy and is approved for this indication in Europe. Recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of osteoporosis in men should lead to fewer fractures and probably fewer deaths.
    Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease 08/2011; 3(4):191-200.

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
29 Downloads
Available from
May 27, 2014