Article

Killip classification in patients with acute coronary syndrome: insight from a multicenter registry

Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, and Weill Cornell Medical School, Doha, Qatar.
The American journal of emergency medicine (Impact Factor: 1.15). 01/2012; 30(1):97-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.10.011
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic value of the Killip classification at the presentation in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In 2007 and over 5 months, 6704 consecutive patients with ACS were enrolled in the Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Patients were categorized according to Killip classification at presentation (Classes I, II, III, and IV). Patients' characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were analyzed. High Killip classes were defined in 22% of patients. In comparison to Killip Class I, patients with higher Killip class had greater prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, presented late, were less likely to have angina, and were less likely to receive antiplatelet, statins, and β-blockers. Classes II, III, and IV were associated with higher adjusted odds of death in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (odds ratio [OR] 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-3.69; OR 6.1, 95% CI 3.41-10.86; and OR 28, 95% CI 15.24-54.70, respectively) and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (adjusted OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.24-4.82; OR 3.2,95% 1.49-7.02; and OR 9.8, 95% CI 3.79-25.57, respectively). In conclusion, across ACS, patients with higher Killip class had worse clinical profile and were less likely to be treated with evidence-based therapy. High Killip class was independent predictors of mortality in ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Physician in the emergency department should be aware of the importance of clinical examination in the risk stratification in patients presenting with ACS.

4 Followers
 · 
1,533 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: We sought to (1) determine the bleeding rates after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in our institution, where the default strategy has been trans-radial (TR) access in combination with unfractionated heparin (UFH) plus eptifibatide, and (2) compare these with the outcomes of patients treated with bivalirudin in HORIZONS-AMI. BACKGROUND: HORIZONS-AMI demonstrated that in PPCI undertaken via the trans-femoral route, routine use of bivalirudin was associated with lower bleeding rates and improved mortality compared to routine use of UFH plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI). METHODS: This was a single-center prospective registry of consecutive patients undergoing PPCI from January 2009 to August 2011 at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, UK. Thirty-day major bleeding was defined as per the HORIZONS-AMI criteria and also according to TIMI and GUSTO scales. RESULTS: Of the 432 consecutive patients, 350 fulfilled entry criteria for HORIZONS-AMI. In contrast with HORIZONS-AMI, these subjects were older (62.5 ± 13.7yr vs. 59.8 ± 11.1yr, P<0.05) with a higher rate of cardiogenic shock (6.3% vs. 0.8%, P<0.0001). Despite this higher risk population, the rate of major bleeding was favorable (3.7% [95% CI: 2.0 to 6.3%] vs. 4.9% [4.0 to 6.1%], P=0.32). Similarly, TIMI major bleeding (2.0% [0.8 to 4.1%] vs. 3.1% [2.3 to 3.4%], P=0.10) and GUSTO severe or life-threatening bleeding (0.6% [0.1 to 2.5%] vs. 0.4% [0.2 to 0.9%], P=0.75) were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Routine TR access for PPCI using UFH plus GPI is associated with a low 30-day rate of major bleeding equivalent to the bivalirudin arm of HORIZONS-AMI. Default trans-radial access for PPCI permits routine use of a GPI without the penalty of high bleeding rates. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 09/2013; 82(3). DOI:10.1002/ccd.24703 · 2.40 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has improved enormously since the introduction of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). It remains unclear whether differences in survival between women and men treated with pPCI exist and if these potential differences can be explained by gender or by differences in baseline- or procedural characteristics. Therefore we systematically reviewed the available evidence.Materials and methodsOn 10-05-2013 Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane were searched for studies comprising original data on STEMI patients treated with pPCI. A separate gender analysis including > 100 women was a requirement. Data were extracted and pooled whenever possible.Results21 studies were included from 2001 to 2013 comprising 47.439 men and 16.927 women. Women were older, had more diabetes (women 24%, men 15%) and hypertension (women 58%, men 45%) and were less current smokers (women 30%, men 54%). The procedural characteristics were comparable except for a longer symptom-to-balloon-time (women 266 min, men 240 min) and less use of GP-IIb/IIIa-inhibitors in women (women 51%, men 57%). Crude short- and long-term mortality was higher in women. Although we could not pool adjusted mortality proportions due to heterogeneity, generally the difference in mortality disappeared after adjustment for baseline- and procedural characteristics.In conclusionMortality is higher in women with STEMI and can be explained by their unfavourable risk profile and longer symptom-to-balloon time.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    European Journal of Clinical Investigation 01/2015; 45(2). DOI:10.1111/eci.12399 · 2.83 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Killip classification of acute heart failure was developed decades ago to predict short-term mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The aim of this study was to determine the long-term prognosis of acute heart failure graded according to the Killip classification in 15,235 unselected patients hospitalized for AMI from 2000 to 2005. Vital status for each patient was ascertained, through to March 1, 2012, from linkage with national death records. A stepwise gradient in the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for 12-year mortality was observed with increasing Killip class: class I (n = 10,123), HR 1.00 (reference group); class II (n = 2,913), HR 1.13 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06 to 1.21); class III (n = 1,217) HR 1.49 (95% CI 1.37 to 1.62); and class IV (n = 898), HR 2.80 (95% CI 2.53 to 3.10). Unexpectedly, in a landmark analysis excluding deaths <30 days after admission, patients in Killip class IV had lower adjusted long-term mortality than those in class III. The adjusted HR for 12-year mortality comparing Killip class IV with Killip class III in patients <60 years of age was 1.71 (95% CI 1.33 to 2.19, p <0.001) and in patients >60 years of age was 2.30 (95% CI 2.07 to 2.56, p <0.001). In conclusion, on the basis of simple clinical features, the Killip classification robustly predicted 12-year mortality after AMI. The heterogeneity in early versus late risk in patients with Killip class IV heart failure underscores the importance of appropriate early treatment in cardiogenic shock. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    The American Journal of Cardiology 01/2015; 115(7). DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.010 · 3.43 Impact Factor