Demographics and beef preferences affect consumer motivation for purchasing fresh beef steaks and roasts

Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Box 42141, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
Meat Science (Impact Factor: 2.62). 04/2011; 87(4):403-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.11.018
Source: PubMed


Surveys completed by 1370 consumers determined the motivational factors affecting consumer purchasing decisions for fresh beef steaks and roasts in three regions in the United States. Females placed greater importance on tenderness, ease of preparation, and nutritional value of steaks and roasts when compared to males. Age influenced tenderness, product consistency, and nutritional value of steaks, but influenced flavor, product consistency, and nutritional value of roasts. Consumers felt juiciness, nutritional value, and natural products were less important in determining their purchasing choices of steaks and roasts as their level of education increased. The preferred degree of doneness of steaks influenced the value placed on six of the nine purchasing motivators. Beef preferences and demographics influenced consumer purchasing decisions for fresh beef steaks and roasts. Results from this study can be used to help identify factors to positively influence purchasing decisions within targeted market segments.

Download full-text


Available from: Andrea Garmyn, Jan 24, 2014
  • Source
    • "Moreover, many consumers prefer well-done strongly heated meat and meat products, which were charcoal-grilled/barbecued, pan fried or roasted, prepared at home, outdoor, or in restaurants (McKenna et al., 2004). Such food is characterized by high palatability and dark, flavorful crust formed during cooking (Reicks et al., 2011; Shrestha et al., 2010). However, most consumers do not realize the risk of such cooking process, which can result in elevated formation of substances dangerous to human health by decreasing food safety (Danowska-Oziewicz, 2009; Lücke & Trafialek, 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract N-Nitroso compounds (NOCs), heterocyclic amines (HCAs), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PHAs) are examples of carcinogenic substances, which are formed during cooking and processing of meat. Many researches suggest that high consumption of meat is positively associated with increased risk of some cancers. The majority of the researches are of epidemiological nature and, therefore, provide only associations related to population exposure to diet-related carcinogenic substances. The individual's exposure risk may be estimated by using food frequency questionnaire and analytical methods. However, there is a lack of methods which enable estimation of the risk concerning particular meat meals. The purpose of this paper was to summarize and emphasize the importance of factors influencing the formation of carcinogenic substances in meat during cooking.
    International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition 05/2014; 65(6):1-7. DOI:10.3109/09637486.2014.917146 · 1.21 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "To beef packers, the USDA quality grade plays a large role in defining meat quality, but palatability or eating quality easily surfaces to the top of consumers' minds when defining meat quality. Reicks et al. (2011) found consumers rely more on flavor , tenderness and juiciness, the 3 key components to eating quality, as purchase motivators compared with other traits such as price, product consistency, nutritional value, convenience, and whether the product was labeled as natural or organic. Fortunately, quality grade and eating quality, specifically the tenderness component, are usually related because researchers have produced results over the years indicating that quality grade affects measurements of objective tenderness (Smith et al., 1985; Nelson et al., 2004; Gruber et al., 2006; Garmyn et al., 2011a). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The use of anabolic implants has a long-standing place in the cattle feeding industry, due to their positive impact on growth performance and subsequent profitability. However, implants can have adverse effects on carcass quality, shear force, and eating quality depending on the dose and frequency, or what some refer to as the aggressiveness of the implant regimen administered. Within the past decade, a new class of growth promotants, known as beta-adrenergic agonists (βAA), has emerged in the beef feeding industry in the U.S. Currently, two have gained FDA approval for use in beef finishing diets to improve performance and carcass yields. Much like anabolic implants, these repartitioning agents can have negative effects on Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF), but the differences do not necessarily translate directly to consumer responses for palatability and acceptance in some instances, especially when tenderness is managed through proper postmortem aging. As researchers continued to investigate the mechanisms responsible for the impact of βAA, inevitably this led to consideration of the interaction between βAA and anabolic implants. Early work combining zilpaterol hydrochloride (ZH) with anabolic implants improved performance, carcass yield, and meat yield with additive negative effects on WBSF. Similar results were produced when pairing ZH with anabolic steroids equipped with various release patterns. As with any tool, the key to success is proper management. Certain cattle populations may be better suited to receive growth promotants such as implants and βAA, and postmortem management of subprimal cuts becomes vital when producers take more aggressive approaches to improve performance and yield. The objective of this review is to overview research findings related to the impact of growth promotant technologies on beef palatability, focusing specifically on the role of implants and βAA on carcass quality, beef tenderness, and consumer responses for meat palatability.
    Journal of Animal Science 10/2013; DOI:10.2527/jas.2013-7097 · 2.11 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "importance of tenderness as a motive for purchasing beef steaks (Reicks et al., 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: New production technologies can help the beef sector to improve eating quality, in particular the tenderness, of low-value meat cuts. This paper aims at profiling potential consumers for unprocessed tenderloin M. Psoas major, muscle profiled M. Infraspinatus and marinated by injection M. Semitendinosus in Belgium (n=108) and Norway (n=110). Consumers' hedonic expectations for the three beef cuts, along with their general attitudes towards beef and food technology, were collected in central location tests. Results show that tenderloin triggers the highest hedonic expectations and best appeals to consumers profiled with high beef involvement in both countries. Consumers' expectations for steaks from novel technologies vary with consumers' attitudes towards beef, food technology and food risks and their country of residence, resulting in three additional consumer profiles. Furthermore, general attitudinal profiles of beef consumers also differ between the two countries. The results are useful for the positioning of novel beef products within the two national markets.
    Meat Science 03/2013; 93(3):361-70. DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.10.002 · 2.62 Impact Factor
Show more