Article

Workers' health risk behaviors by state, demographic characteristics, and health insurance status.

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Preventing chronic disease (Impact Factor: 1.96). 01/2011; 8(1):A12.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Employers often lack data about their workers' health risk behaviors. We analyzed state-level prevalence data among workers for 4 common health risk behaviors: obesity, physical inactivity, smoking, and missed influenza vaccination (among workers older than 50 years).
We analyzed 2007 and 2008 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data, restricting the sample to employed respondents aged 18 to 64 years. We stratified health risk behavior prevalence by annual household income, educational attainment, health insurance status, and race/ethnicity.
For all 4 health risk behaviors, we found significant differences across states and significant disparities related to social determinants of health - income, education, and race/ethnicity. Among uninsured workers, prevalence of smoking was high and influenza vaccinations were lacking.
In this national survey study, we found that workers' health risk behaviors vary substantially by state and by workers' socioeconomic status, insurance status, and race/ethnicity. Employers and workplace health promotion practitioners can use the prevalence tables presented in this article to inform their workplace health promotion programs.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
108 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Data that estimate the prevalence of and risk factors for worker obesity by occupation are generally unavailable and could inform the prioritization of workplace wellness programs. The aims of this study were to estimate the prevalence of obesity by occupation, examine the association of occupational physical activity and a range of health behaviors with obesity, and identify occupations in which workers are at high risk of obesity in Washington State. We conducted descriptive and multivariable analyses among 37,626 employed Washington State respondents using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System in odd numbered years, from 2003 through 2009. We estimated prevalence and prevalence ratios (PRs) by occupational groups adjusting for demographics, occupational physical activity level, smoking, fruit and vegetable consumption, and leisure-time physical activity (LPTA). Overall obesity prevalence was 24.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.0-25.1). Workers in protective services were 2.46 (95% CI, 1.72-3.50) times as likely to be obese as workers in health diagnosing occupations. Compared with their counterparts, workers who consumed adequate amounts of fruits and vegetables and had adequate LTPA were significantly less likely to be obese (PR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86-0.97 and PR = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.60-0.67, respectively). Workers with physically demanding occupational physical activity had a lower PR of obesity (PR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.78-0.88) than those with nonphysically demanding occupational physical activity. Obesity prevalence and health risk behaviors vary substantially by occupation. Employers, policy makers, and health promotion practitioners can use our results to target and prioritize workplace obesity prevention and health behavior promotion programs.
    Preventing chronic disease 01/2014; 11:E04. DOI:10.5888/pcd11.130219 · 1.96 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives The objective was to assess current emergency department (ED) provider practices and preferences for tobacco cessation interventions. The ED is an opportune place to initiate smoking cessation interventions. However, little is known about ED provider current practices and preferences for cessation counseling in the ED.Methods This was a survey of ED providers conducted in 2008–2009 (including physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and nurses), working at least half-time at 10 U.S. academic EDs, regarding adherence to clinical practice guidelines (“5 As”) and preferences for cessation interventions/styles. Data analysis occurred in 2012–2013.ResultsThe response rate was 64% (800 out of 1,246 completed surveys). Providers reported strongest adherence to asking about patient smoking status, followed by advising, with significant variance by clinical role. Assessing, assisting, and arranging support for patients was low overall. Most frequently used interventions were to provide patients with a list of telephone numbers for stop-smoking counseling (87%), pamphlets on smoking health risks and the benefits of stopping (85%), and referrals to the National Toll-Free Smoker's Quitline (84%). Most providers (80%) were supportive of personally conducting brief (less than 3 minutes) smoking cessation counseling sessions during the ED visit, emphasizing education and encouragement. The least appealing intervention was writing a prescription for nicotine replacement therapies or medications to stop smoking (35%).Conclusions Interventions most likely to be used were brief and delivered with a positive tone and included referral to external resources. The logical next step is to design and test interventions that ED providers find acceptable.ResumenObjetivosEvaluar las preferencias y las prácticas actuales de los sanitarios del servicio de urgencias (SU) en intervenciones sobre deshabituación tabáquica. El SU es un lugar idóneo para iniciar las intervenciones sobre deshabituación tabáquica. Sin embargo, se conoce poco acerca de las preferencias y las prácticas actuales de los sanitarios del SU acerca del asesoramiento a pacientes sobre el cese del hábito.MetodologíaEncuesta a los sanitarios del SU (incluyendo médicos, enfermeros de práctica avanzada, enfermeros y asistentes médicos) llevada a cabo en 2008–2009 en diez SU estadounidenses, con turnos de al menos media jornada, en relación con la adherencia a las guías de práctica clínica (5 As) y las preferencias para las intervenciones/actitudes en deshabituación. El análisis de los datos tuvo lugar en 2012–2013.ResultadosEl porcentaje de respuesta fue del 64% (799 de 1246 encuestas completadas). Los sanitarios documentaron mayor adherencia a preguntar sobre el hábito tabáquico del paciente, seguida del consejo, con una variación significativa en función del rol clínico. La valoración, la asistencia y la organización de ayuda para los pacientes fue generalmente baja. Las intervenciones más frecuentemente empleadas fueron proporcionar a los pacientes una lista de números de teléfono para consejo de dejar de fumar (87%), panfletos de los riesgos para la salud de fumar y de los beneficios de su cese (85%), y una derivación al ′National Toll-Free Smoker′s Quitline′ (teléfono nacional gratuito de deshabituación) (84%). La mayoría de los sanitarios (80%) apoyó las entrevistas personales breves (menos de tres minutos) para el cese del hábito durante la visita al SU, enfatizadas en la educación y el refuerzo positivo. La intervención menos atractiva fue la prescripción de tratamientos sustitutivos de nicotina o de fármacos para dejar de fumar (35%).ConclusionesLas intervenciones usadas con mayor frecuencia fueron breves y proporcionadas con tono positivo e incluyeron derivaciones a recursos externos. El siguiente paso lógico es diseñar y probar intervenciones que los sanitarios de los SU encuentren aceptables.
    Academic Emergency Medicine 08/2014; DOI:10.1111/acem.12421 · 2.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) is a complex disorder defined as a cluster of interconnected risk factors such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity and high blood glucose levels. Premorbid metabolic syndrome (PMetS) is defined by excluding patients with previously diagnosed cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus from those suffering MetS. We aimed to determine the prevalence of PMetS in a working population, and to analyse the relationship between the diagnostic criteria of the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) and of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (ATPIII). The relationship between the presence of PMetS and cardiovascular risk factors was also analysed. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 24,529 male and 18,736 female Spanish (white western European) adult workers (20-65 years) randomly selected during their work health periodic examinations. Anthropometrics, blood pressure and serum parameters were measured. The presence of MetS and PMetS was ascertained using ATPIII and IDF criteria. Cardiovascular risk was determined using the Framingham-REGICOR equation. The results showed MetS had an adjusted global prevalence of 12.39% using ATPIII criteria and 16.46% using IDF criteria. The prevalence of PMetS was slightly lower (11.21% using ATPIII criteria and 14.72% using IDF criteria). Prevalence in males was always higher than in females. Participants with PMetS displayed higher values of BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, glucose and triglycerides, and lower HDL-cholesterol levels. Logistic regression models reported lower PMetS risk for females, non-obese subjects, non-smokers and younger participants. Cardiovascular risk determined with Framingham-REGICOR was higher in participants with PMetS. PMetS could be a reliable tool for the early identification of apparently healthy individuals who have a significant risk for developing cardiovascular events and type 2 diabetes.
    PLoS ONE 02/2014; 9(2):e89281. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0089281 · 3.53 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
5 Downloads
Available from
Sep 2, 2014