The rotational approach to medical education: time to confront our assumptions?

American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106, USA.
Medical Education (Impact Factor: 3.62). 01/2011; 45(1):69-80. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03847.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Trainees in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education engage in multiple transitions as part of the educational process, including many transitions that occur on both periodic and daily bases within medical education programmes. The clinical rotation, based on either a medical discipline or clinical care setting and occurring over a predetermined, short period of time, is a deeply entrenched educational approach with its roots in Abraham Flexner's seminal report. Many assumptions about the presumed benefits of clinical rotations have become pervasive despite a lack of empirical evidence on their optimal timing and structure, and on how transitions between clinical rotations should occur.
In this paper, we examine the issue of rotational transitions from the three perspectives of sociology, learning theory, and the improvement of quality and safety.
Discussion from the sociological perspective addresses the need for much greater attention to interprofessional relationships and professional development, whereas that from the learning theory perspective examines the gap between what is known from pedagogical and cognitive science and what is currently practised (learning theory). Discussion from the perspective of improving quality and safety refers to the critical need to embed trainees in functional clinical microsystems as meaningful participants.
Research is urgently needed on the effects of transitions on trainees, faculty staff, non-doctor health care providers and patients in order to optimise future competency-based training models and confirm or refute current assumptions.

Download full-text


Available from: Shiphra Ginsburg, Apr 09, 2015
1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: This study aimed to describe perceptions of clinical placement experiences and competency development for international speech-language pathology students and to determine if these perceptions were different for domestic students. Method: Domestic and international students at two Australian universities participated in nine focus group interviews. Thematic analysis led to the identification of two themes shared by international and domestic students and several separate themes. Result: Shared themes identified the important influence of students’ relationships with clinical educators, unique opportunities and learning that occurs on placement. International student themes included concerns about their communication skills and the impact of these skills on client progress. They also explored their adjustment to unfamiliar placement settings and relationships, preferring structured placements to assist this adjustment. Domestic student themes explored the critical nature of competency attainment and assessment on placement, valuing placements that enabled them to achieve their goals. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that international students experience additional communication, cultural and contextual demands on clinical placement, which may increase their learning requirements. Clinical education practices must be responsive to the learning needs of diverse student populations. Strategies are suggested to assist all students to adjust to the professional and learning expectations of clinical education placements. Keywords Clinical education, international students, placement, fieldwork, competency Read More:
    International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 03/2015; 17(3). DOI:10.3109/17549507.2015.1016109 · 1.41 Impact Factor
  • 12/2014; 6(4):786-8. DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-14-00491.1
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Hidden curriculum literature suggests that different learning environments and curricular designs reinforce disparate values and behaviors. Aim: This study explores potential differences in learning environments afforded by two clerkship models through perceptions of the ideal student. Methods: In this qualitative study, research assistants interviewed 48 third-year students and 26 clinical supervisors from three US medical schools. Students and supervisors participated in longitudinal integrated clerkships (LICs) or block clerkships. Students and supervisors described the ideal student in their clerkship. Using phenomenographic techniques, authors identified five ideal student profiles and coded students’ and supervisors’ descriptions for alignment with one or more profiles. Results: Most students in both models described an ideal student who matched a learner profile (proactive and self-directed). More LIC students described an ideal student who fit a caregiver profile (engaging with and advocating for patients) and more block students described performer (appearing knowledgeable and competent) and team-player (working well with others) profiles. Supervisors’ descriptions paralleled students’ descriptions but with less emphasis on caregiving. Conclusions: Ideal student descriptions in LIC and block models may reflect different learning experiences and values emphasized in each model. These findings suggest implications for students’ construction of professional identities that warrant further exploration.
    Medical Teacher 04/2015; · 2.05 Impact Factor