Article

Nonoperative treatment of both-bone forearm shaft fractures in children: predictors of early radiographic failure.

University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Journal of pediatric orthopedics (Impact Factor: 1.23). 31(1):23-32. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318203205b
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Forearm shaft fractures are the third most common fracture in children. Although closed reduction and casting is the preferred treatment; outcomes remain variable. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with failure of nonoperative treatment for pediatric complete forearm shaft fractures and to explore the time frame in which failure is likely.
Male patients less than 18 years and female patients less than 17 years of age, who were treated for a complete both-bone forearm shaft fracture between January 2005 and January 2008, were included. A pediatric orthopaedic surgeon evaluated all radiographs to confirm the diagnosis. Fractures were classified as proximal, middle, or distal, based one-third division of the shaft. Thresholds for maximum acceptable angulation for male patients < 10 years and female patients < 8 years were as follows: 10 degrees for proximal-third, 15 degrees for middle-third, 20 degrees for distal-third fractures; for female patients ≥ 8 years and male patients ≥ 10 years, up to 10 degrees was considered acceptable at all the levels. Angulation was measured at initial presentation and at weekly intervals for 4 weeks post fracture. Anteroposterior measurements accounted for the natural bow of the radius. Multivariable logistical regression was performed to identify predictors of failure.
Of the 321 patients identified, 282 underwent closed reduction and casting. The average age of patients was 8.5 years, 63% were male. Fifty-one percent of patients exceeded angulation criteria within the follow-up period. Of those who failed, 55% failed by the end of the first week, and 95% failed by 3 weeks. Odds of failure was greatest in patients ≥ 10 years (odds ratio (OR)=2.79; confidence interval (CI) 95, 1.47-5.29), those with proximal radius fractures (OR=6.81; CI95, 3.28-14.14), and those with initial ulna angulations < 15 degrees (OR=2.94; CI95, 1.49-5.83).
Children with 10 years of age or older, with proximal-third radius fractures, and ulna angulation <15 degrees seem to be at highest risk for failure when treated nonoperatively for both-bone forearm fractures. As the majority of failures occur early, early surgical decision-making is encouraged.
Prognostic Level II.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
64 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Shaft fractures of the long bones are among the most common pediatric injuries. They are characterized by a limited potential for spontaneous correction because of the fractures-distance to the physis. Although conservative treatment has been practiced for many years with satisfying results, several aspects have led to an increase in the numbers of surgical procedures including changes of living, sports habits, economics, and patients-request to treatment. We reviewed the literature to describe developments of treatment concepts of pediatric shaft fractures. In shaft fractures of the upper extremities, increasing rates of surgical procedures have been reported preventing functional deficits of forearm prosupination and cosmetic deformities of the humerus. In fractures of the lower extremities maximizing stability shifted into the focus of interest to achieve early mobilization and to compensate heavier body weights of children and adolescents. Consecutively, the current gold standard of pediatric shaft fracture treatment-ESIN (elastic stable intramedullary nailing)-has been modified repeatedly using end caps, prebended nails, and optimized surgical techniques. In addition, new methods such as rigid locking nails and plates have been included in the treatment approaches for femur and tibia shaft fractures. All these methods of pediatric fracture care carry inherent advantages that require consideration for each clinical situation. On the other side, this has enlarged the spectrum of potential complications, which needs continuous evaluation to further improve treatment results.
    European Journal of Pediatric Surgery 12/2013; 23(6). DOI:10.1055/s-0033-1360460 · 0.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Forearm fractures occur commonly in children; however, there is still uncertainty on what leads to conversion from conservative to operative management. Patients who initially underwent closed reduction and casting for diaphyseal forearm fractures were evaluated for predictors of conversion to operative management. We found that the 20 of 124 (16%) patients in whom there was conversion to operative management were significantly older (11.1 vs. 5.7 nonoperative), had less angulation in the anterior-posterior (or coronal) plane (20.2 vs. 12.8° for the radius, 17.5 vs. 7.8° for the ulna), had a more proximal ulnar fracture location, and had more translated or shortened radius fractures. Level of evidence: level 3, retrospective case-control.
    Journal of pediatric orthopaedics. Part B / European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America 12/2013; 23(2). DOI:10.1097/BPB.0000000000000018 · 0.66 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Our present study examines the complications of pediatric patients treated with plate fixation for forearm fractures. Case series of pediatric patients after their forearm fracture was fixed using a plate with the majority of patients retaining their implants. Level I Trauma Center METHODS:: From 1999-2009, 58 patients between the ages of 6 and 15 years old had fixation of their forearm fracture with plates. Thirty-three of these patients were available for long term follow up with an average of 6.4 years. Patients were interviewed over the phone and a physician filled out a questionnaire with regard to their clinical course. Records and x-rays were reviewed for each patient. Factors such as implant complications, functional activity level, pain score, and clinical symptoms were studied. Fractures occurred in 7.1% (2/28) of the patients who chose to retain their implants. Of the 28 patients who initially chose to leave the implants in place, 17.9% (5/28) had partial or complete removal of the implants due to irritation. These patients reported the following symptoms: mild pain 42.3% (11/26), clicking 34.6% (9/26), ability to feel the plates 73.1% (19/26), and mild weakness 26.9% (7/26). The number of patients who reported return to pre-injury level of activity was 88.5% (23/26) and 96.2% (25/26) reported being satisfied with their clinical outcome when implants were retained. Females had a significantly greater subjective weakness 60.0% (6/10) compared to males 14.3% (3/21) (P=0.009) after a forearm fracture. The inability to return to pre-injury level of activity was significantly greater for females 30.0% (3/10) versus 0.0% (0/21) for males (P=0.008). We concluded that retaining plates in pediatric forearm fractures does not increase the refracture rate compared to removal from historical rates in the literature. Patients should be warned of possible symptoms and complications that may be present with retained plates. Also, more aggressive physical therapy may be considered for females since they were observed to have more subjective weakness and dysfunction at long term follow up. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
    Journal of orthopaedic trauma 10/2013; DOI:10.1097/01.bot.0000435630.63770.3d · 1.78 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
16 Downloads
Available from
May 21, 2014