Nonoperative Treatment of Both-bone Forearm Shaft Fractures in Children

University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Journal of pediatric orthopedics (Impact Factor: 1.47). 01/2011; 31(1):23-32. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318203205b
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Forearm shaft fractures are the third most common fracture in children. Although closed reduction and casting is the preferred treatment; outcomes remain variable. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with failure of nonoperative treatment for pediatric complete forearm shaft fractures and to explore the time frame in which failure is likely.
Male patients less than 18 years and female patients less than 17 years of age, who were treated for a complete both-bone forearm shaft fracture between January 2005 and January 2008, were included. A pediatric orthopaedic surgeon evaluated all radiographs to confirm the diagnosis. Fractures were classified as proximal, middle, or distal, based one-third division of the shaft. Thresholds for maximum acceptable angulation for male patients < 10 years and female patients < 8 years were as follows: 10 degrees for proximal-third, 15 degrees for middle-third, 20 degrees for distal-third fractures; for female patients ≥ 8 years and male patients ≥ 10 years, up to 10 degrees was considered acceptable at all the levels. Angulation was measured at initial presentation and at weekly intervals for 4 weeks post fracture. Anteroposterior measurements accounted for the natural bow of the radius. Multivariable logistical regression was performed to identify predictors of failure.
Of the 321 patients identified, 282 underwent closed reduction and casting. The average age of patients was 8.5 years, 63% were male. Fifty-one percent of patients exceeded angulation criteria within the follow-up period. Of those who failed, 55% failed by the end of the first week, and 95% failed by 3 weeks. Odds of failure was greatest in patients ≥ 10 years (odds ratio (OR)=2.79; confidence interval (CI) 95, 1.47-5.29), those with proximal radius fractures (OR=6.81; CI95, 3.28-14.14), and those with initial ulna angulations < 15 degrees (OR=2.94; CI95, 1.49-5.83).
Children with 10 years of age or older, with proximal-third radius fractures, and ulna angulation <15 degrees seem to be at highest risk for failure when treated nonoperatively for both-bone forearm fractures. As the majority of failures occur early, early surgical decision-making is encouraged.
Prognostic Level II.

Download full-text


Available from: Eric Bowman, Apr 09, 2014
35 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fractures of the distal third forearm are common fractures in childhood. Most of these fractures can be treated non-operatively by means of closed reduction and immobilization. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to investigate whether above- or below-elbow cast should be considered the first-choice for conservative treatment. A search was performed in multiple databases to identify all the studies comparing above- and below-elbow cast for the treatment of distal third forearm fractures in children. All RCT's or CCT's were assessed for eligibility. Quality was assessed by the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group assessment. Data were pooled using RevMan 5.0 Three trials involving a total of 300 participants were included. A total of 142 fractures were treated with a below-elbow cast (BEC) versus 158 with an above-elbow cast (AEC). Loss of reduction was encountered in 17 and 36 cases, respectively [odds ratio 0.44 (0.22-0.87)]. For combined radius and ulna fractures 15 of 97 in the BEC group and 34 out of 122 in the AEC group showed loss of reduction [odds ratio 0.55 (0.26-1.15)]. Children treated with BEC missed less school days [mean difference 1.12 (-1.52 to -0.59)], and encountered less difficulties in daily living [odds ratio 112.41 (6.58-1920.77)]. Due to heterogeneity, the trials are not fully compared. Based on the presented meta-analysis, we conclude that BEC is not inferior to AEC so that this is a valid treatment option for distal third forearm fractures.
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 08/2011; 131(12):1663-71. DOI:10.1007/s00402-011-1363-9 · 1.60 Impact Factor
  • Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie 01/2012; 150(06):648-656. DOI:10.1055/s-0032-1327903 · 0.49 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fractures of the extremities are commonly encountered in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) nationwide. These fractures can lead to bone malformation and deformities if not managed properly. There are multiple barriers to obtaining necessary outpatient follow-up for fracture care, which leads to increased return to the PED for management. Because of these barriers, a "Fracture Care Program" was implemented at the study hospital's network. This study aimed to determine implementation of a Fracture Care Program would lead to reduced PED utilization. All visits to the study PEDs were examined from January 1 to August 30, 2010. At PED discharge, patients were given a Fracture Care Program handout, which outlined step-by-step instructions for identifying and scheduling an appointment with a local orthopedic surgeon as an outpatient. A telephone hotline number was also provided where they could speak with a representative of the orthopedics department for assistance in obtaining follow-up. Detailed records were reviewed to determine whether these instructions were associated with lower rates of return. A total of 2120 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 1233 (58%) received the Fracture Care discharge instructions. After controlling for differences in payor status and demographic differences, patients who received instructions were less likely to return to the PED (odds ratio, 0.616; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.95) within 30 days for orthopedic care than patients who did not receive the instructions. This systematic coordination of services of a large tertiary care pediatric health care system, local pediatric orthopedic surgery private practices, academic practices, and hospital-affiliated practices improved overall access for families related to orthopedic follow-up care. This model may also aid in helping to improve follow-up in other pediatric subspecialties.
    Pediatric emergency care 06/2012; 28(7):680-3. DOI:10.1097/PEC.0b013e31825d2121 · 1.05 Impact Factor
Show more