Article

Long-term effects of lung cancer computed tomography screening on health-related quality of life: the NELSON trial.

Dept of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
European Respiratory Journal (Impact Factor: 7.13). 12/2010; 38(1):154-61. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00123410
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The long-term effects of lung cancer computed tomography (CT) screening on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) have not yet been investigated. In the Dutch-Belgian Randomised Lung Cancer Screening Trial (NELSON trial), 1,466 participants received questionnaires before randomisation (T0), 2 months after baseline screening (screen group only; T1) and at 2-yr follow-up (T2). HRQoL was measured as generic HRQoL (12-item short-form questionnaire and EuroQoL questionnaire), anxiety (Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) and lung cancer-specific distress (impact of event scale (IES)). Repeated measures of ANOVA were used to analyse differences between the screen and control groups, and between indeterminate (requiring a follow-up CT) and negative screening result groups. At T0 and T2 there were no significant differences in HRQoL scores over time between the screen and control groups, or between the indeterminate or negative second-round screening result group. There was a temporary increase in IES scores after an indeterminate baseline result (T0: mean 4.0 (95% CI 2.8-5.3); T1: mean 7.8 (95% CI 6.5-9.0); T2: mean 4.5 (95% CI 3.3-5.8)). At 2-yr follow-up, the HRQoL of screened subjects was similar to that of control subjects, the unfavourable short-term effects of an indeterminate baseline screening result had resolved and an indeterminate result at the second screening round had no impact on HRQoL.

0 Followers
 · 
93 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is now widely recommended for adults who are current or former heavy smokers. It is important to evaluate the impact of screening on patient-centered outcomes. Among current and former smokers eligible for lung cancer screening, we sought to determine the consequences of screening with LDCT, and subsequent results, on patient-centered outcomes such as quality of life, distress, and anxiety.
    Journal of thoracic oncology: official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer 06/2014; 9(7). DOI:10.1097/JTO.0000000000000210 · 5.80 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The mortality from lung cancer exceeds that from breast, colorectal and pancreatic cancer combined. This is because three-quarters of patients present with late stage disease when treatment is palliative and survival is short. If detected early, lung cancer can be cured so screening would seem to be an important intervention. Until the publication of the National Lung Screening Trial there was no evidence to support the implementation of screening with low-dose CT. This publication has sparked a different approach to the subject from asking whether it works to what we still need to know to implement with least harm and cost. These remaining issues will be reviewed.
    British Journal of Radiology 10/2014; 87(1044):20140416. DOI:10.1259/bjr.20140416 · 1.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To measure the psychosocial consequences in the Danish lung cancer screening trial (DLCST) and compare those between the computed tomography (CT) group and the control group. This study was a single centre randomised controlled trial with five annual screening rounds. Healthy current or former heavy smokers aged 50-70 years (men and women) were randomised 1:1 to a CT group and a control group. Heavy smokers were defined by having smoked ≥20 pack years and former smokers by being abstinent ≤10 years. Both groups were invited annually to the screening clinic to complete the validated lung-cancer-specific questionnaire consequences of screening lung cancer (COS-LC). The CT group was also offered a low dose CT scan of the lungs. The COS-LC measures nine scales with psychosocial properties: Anxiety, Behaviour, Dejection, Negative impact on sleep, Self-blame, Focus on Airway Symptoms, Stigmatisation, Introvert, and Harm of Smoking. 4104 participants were randomised to the DLCST and the COS-LC completion rates for the CT group and the control group were 95.5% and 73.6%, respectively. There was a significant increase in negative psychosocial consequences from baseline through rounds 2-5 for both the CT group and the control group (mean increase >0, p<.0001 for 3 of 4 possible scales). During rounds 2-5 the control group experienced significantly more negative psychosocial consequences in seven of nine scales compared with the CT group (mean Δ score >0 and p<.033). Lung cancer CT-screening trials induced more negative psychosocial reactions in both the CT group and the control group compared with the baseline psychosocial profile. The CT group experienced less negative psychosocial consequences compared with the control group, which might be explained by reassurance among those with normal screening results. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00496977. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 11/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.11.003 · 3.74 Impact Factor