Article

A randomized controlled trial of continuous activity, short bouts, and a 10,000 step guideline in inactive adults

Department of Exercise and Sport Science, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA.
Preventive Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.93). 02/2011; 52(2):120-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.12.001
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although several studies have examined the effect of accumulated bouts on health outcomes, the impact of recommending short bouts on activity-related behavior in health promotion efforts has received minimal investigation.
During this 5-week study in 2007-2008, 43 university employees (8 male, 35 female) in the Southeastern United States were randomly assigned to a group recommended to achieve (a) 10,000 steps (10K), (b) 30-minutes (30 min) of continuous physical activity, or (c) 30-minutes of activity in bouts of at least 10 minutes (bouts).
Repeated measures ANOVA revealed that the 10K group showed the largest increase in step counts whereas the bouts group showed the smallest change over the intervention period, p=0.01. Condition differences were most pronounced on days in which participants met their activity recommendation. Accelerometer results revealed that the 10K (d=1.1) and 30 min groups (d=0.89) showed large increases in minutes of moderate to vigorous activity (MVPA), whereas the bouts group showed minimal change (d=0.11). Although activity recommendations did not differentially affect self-efficacy, participants from all conditions showed decreased self-efficacy across the intervention (p=0.02), highlighting the need to develop strategies to increase self-efficacy in activity promotion efforts.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Matthew T Mahar, Jul 19, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
165 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: World Health Organization (WHO) has prioritized physical activity (PA) as one of the most relevant strategies leading the decreasing prevalence of noncommunicable chronic diseases. Pedometer has emerged as one of the valid intervention programs, reliable and useful to assess, measure and promote the physical activity practice, through counts the number of steps per day. One of the aims is to establish the goals based on steps per day made by a person and the positive feedback, which can generate behavior changes and adoption of healthy habits, from a regular physical activity practice perspective. This review attends to enhance the current state of pedometer program, as an intervention one, in all kind of population; its health impact and the application methodologies, using the pedometer as a steps quantifier device, with feasible access, use and management. Additionally, the review will be useful as a framework to design future research projects, aim to develop, adapt and apply evidence based pedometer protocols, inside clinical, academic and community context.
    Revista Ciencias de la Salud 08/2011; 9(2):191-201.
  • Source
    Preventive Medicine 02/2012; 54(2):111. DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.01.008 · 2.93 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives The objective of this study was to investigate changes in use of time when undertaking a structured exercise program. Design This study used a randomised, multi-arm, controlled trial design. Methods A total of 129 insufficiently active adults aged 18-60 years were recruited and randomly allocated to one of three groups, a Moderate or Extensive six-week exercise group (150 and 300 additional minutes of exercise per week, respectively) or a Control group. Prescribed exercise was accumulated through both group and individual sessions. Use of time was measured at baseline and end-program using the Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adults, a computerised 24-hour recall instrument. Daily minutes of activity in activity domains and energy expenditure zones were determined. Results Relative to changes in the control group, daily time spent in the Physical Activity [F (2, 108) = 20.21, p < 0.001] and Active Transport [F (2, 108) = 3.71, p = 0.03] time use domains significantly increased in the intervention groups by 21-45 minutes/day. Comparatively, the intervention groups spent significantly less time watching television [F (2, 108) = 5.02, p = 0.008; -50-52 min/day], relative to Controls. Additionally, time spent in the moderate to vigorous energy expenditure zone had significantly increased in the intervention groups by end-program [F (2, 108) = 6.35, p = 0.002; 48-50 min/day], relative to Controls. Conclusion This study is the first to comprehensively map changes in time use across an exercise program. The results suggest that exercise interventions should be mindful not only of compliance but of “isotemporal displacement” of behaviours.
    02/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.jsams.2014.01.004
Show more